Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 132


  Reply # 1109050 15-Aug-2014 13:57
Send private message

andrewNZ: Something I don't ever see mentioned, is that faster speeds mean people get things done faster and free up connections sooner (until demand increases again).

I'd compare it to the difference between chip EFTPOS machines on dialup and broadband. The dialup ones are much slower, and so can process far fewer customers per hour.

I may totally misunderstand how these things work.


Well it would depend on how the users could utilize that speed, if they have super low caps then yes they'll free up bandwidth since they are concious of how much data they are using. If they have high caps then still yes, but at a decreased rate since they will be less concious of how much data they are spending and a more likely to use bandwidth for longer periods of time. The problem is when you give an unlimited cap and people find excuses to max out their connections for long periods of time.

Now with cell sites I believe that's less of an issue since they try to divide the bandwidth up evenly across its users.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

5 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1109057 15-Aug-2014 14:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.

 
 
 
 


698 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 399

Trusted

  Reply # 1109061 15-Aug-2014 14:21
2 people support this post
Send private message

drivel: I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.


Without carrier aggregation, increasing data caps would just ensure that everybody on the network would be browsing at the speed of continental drift.




832 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Trusted

  Reply # 1109065 15-Aug-2014 14:25
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.


Without carrier aggregation, increasing data caps would just ensure that everybody on the network would be browsing at the speed of continental drift.


<objoke> "like <insert current telco name here>" </objoke>

597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 132


  Reply # 1109066 15-Aug-2014 14:25
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.


Without carrier aggregation, increasing data caps would just ensure that everybody on the network would be browsing at the speed of continental drift.


Without increasing caps, carrier aggregation would just ensure you're spending more money.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

698 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 399

Trusted

  Reply # 1109067 15-Aug-2014 14:27
2 people support this post
Send private message

charsleysa:
Demeter:
drivel: I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.


Without carrier aggregation, increasing data caps would just ensure that everybody on the network would be browsing at the speed of continental drift.


Without increasing caps, carrier aggregation would just ensure you're spending more money.


You know the thing about the chicken and the egg, yeah? :P




5 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1109068 15-Aug-2014 14:28
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: I'd like they double data allowance rather than put their money into Carrier Aggregation upgrade.


Without carrier aggregation, increasing data caps would just ensure that everybody on the network would be browsing at the speed of continental drift.


Oh really?

Why did every time I run Speedtest.net and it went around 70-80Mbps? Hmm, the reason probably would be -- no one is using it!

Let's compare plans in Aus, the UK and NZ.






5 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1109074 15-Aug-2014 14:35
2 people support this post
Send private message

And to save your time, here's the currency.

69 New Zealand Dollar = 62.79 Australian Dollar = 35.05 British Pound Sterling

This means that you pay 69 NZD only get 1.5GB/m and Australian pay 60 AUD for 4GB per month (and also 300 min International Calls in Aus).

Oh dear, they must be suffering from the slow speed right now! Let's save them and shrink their data allowance to 50%.

698 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 399

Trusted

  Reply # 1109079 15-Aug-2014 14:36
2 people support this post
Send private message

drivel: Let's compare plans in Aus, the UK and NZ.


Okay, lets.

Population of United Kingdom: 63.23 million (2012)
Population of Australia: 22.68 million (2012)

Wait for it....

Population of New Zealand: 4.433 million (2012)

Funnily, deploying network infrastructure costs the same everywhere regardless of how much income potential a carrier has. Go figure.






4948 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1316

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 1109081 15-Aug-2014 14:39
4 people support this post
Send private message

Indeed. If you think you're being rorted and there is an opportunity maybe setup your own Telco and bring down the data prices.

5 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1109083 15-Aug-2014 14:41
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: Let's compare plans in Aus, the UK and NZ.


Okay, lets.

Population of United Kingdom: 63.23 million (2012)
Population of Australia: 22.68 million (2012)

Wait for it....

Population of New Zealand: 4.433 million (2012)

Funnily, deploying network infrastructure costs the same everywhere regardless of how much income potential a carrier has. Go figure.




Then why are Vodafone NZ keeps putting their money to Carrier Aggregation since population density of NZ is *MUCH LOWER* than AUS and the UK?

Lower population density means less people connect to a base station, will there be a congestion? God knows.

597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 132


  Reply # 1109084 15-Aug-2014 14:42
Send private message

nathan: Indeed. If you think you're being rorted and there is an opportunity maybe setup your own Telco and bring down the data prices.


Doesn't this remind you of someone? *cough*2degrees*cough*




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

832 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Trusted

  Reply # 1109088 15-Aug-2014 14:44
2 people support this post
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: Let's compare plans in Aus, the UK and NZ.



Funnily, deploying network infrastructure costs the same everywhere regardless of how much income potential a carrier has. Go figure.




The Australian NBN programme would disagree with you :-)

698 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 399

Trusted

  Reply # 1109089 15-Aug-2014 14:45
Send private message

drivel: Then why are Vodafone NZ keeps putting their money to Carrier Aggregation since population density of NZ is *MUCH LOWER* than AUS and the UK?

Lower population density means less people connect to a base station, will there be a congestion? God knows.


Look, not to be rude or anything, but are you familiar with the concept of future proofing? We're trying to make sure our network provides a first rate customer experience, not just hobbles along like so many networks do abroad.




5 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1109128 15-Aug-2014 15:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

Demeter:
drivel: Then why are Vodafone NZ keeps putting their money to Carrier Aggregation since population density of NZ is *MUCH LOWER* than AUS and the UK?

Lower population density means less people connect to a base station, will there be a congestion? God knows.


Look, not to be rude or anything, but are you familiar with the concept of future proofing? We're trying to make sure our network provides a first rate customer experience, not just hobbles along like so many networks do abroad.


TBH, I have no idea about that. But the question in my head is "Do we really need a Tri-Band Carrier Aggregation here in NZ?" 

Coz customers are the ones who will pay the bill of upgrade. undecided

BTW I have never heard any complaint from my friends about base station congestion or slow mobile Internet speed but some of them wish they had more data allowance.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28


Vocus Communications wins a place on the TaaS panel
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:16


SwipedOn raises $1 million capital
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:15


Slingshot offers unlimited gigabit fibre for under a ton
Posted 25-Jan-2018 13:51


Spark doubles down on wireless broadband
Posted 24-Jan-2018 15:44


New Zealand's IT industry in 2018 and beyond
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:50


Introducing your new workplace headache: Gen Z
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:45


Jucy set to introduce electric campervan fleet
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.