Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 30


  Reply # 1112032 20-Aug-2014 13:02
Send private message

I'd add the PCP settings to your WAN rule allowing inbound traffic from the Vodafone address.

 

I'd also create another rule with PCP marking in the LAN allowing all traffic from 192.168.1.7 to 224.0.0.0/4 and the Vodafone address.

Once you've done this, try restarting the STB and checking the logs on pfsense.



563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89


  Reply # 1112203 20-Aug-2014 16:27
Send private message

Trying different PCP settings doesn't seem to make a noticeable difference; but could well be the issue.

I've gone back to basics by unplugging everything else and just working on trying to get a clear picture streaming on PC.

Currently best I get is distorted picture and intermittent sound with the following settings:






5738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1695

Trusted

  Reply # 1112209 20-Aug-2014 16:35
2 people support this post
Send private message

I couldn't tell you nor know the whole IP range of the IP TV service. Who is to say they change tomorrow or next week? I have some funny feeling about the VM setup. I thought you were running a machine with PF sense not via  VM..


Edit: Network engineer next to me shook his head when he saw the Free BSD + Hyper-V.




Steam: Coil (Same photos as profile here)
Origin: Scranax
Currently playing on PC: Rust, Subnautica, CS:GO, AOE2 HD, BeamNG Drive, BF1.


854 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 1112232 20-Aug-2014 16:54
One person supports this post
Send private message

TimA: I couldn't tell you nor know the whole IP range of the IP TV service. Who is to say they change tomorrow or next week? I have some funny feeling about the VM setup. I thought you were running a machine with PF sense not via  VM..


Edit: Network engineer next to me shook his head when he saw the Free BSD + Hyper-V.


I'm also dubious of the VM setup (especially since based on the previous posts it's actually Windows 8+VMWare (not Hyper-V) then pfSense (FreeBSD) in a VM), in fact I want to cry.

Try pfSense on bare metal, or consider getting something like the EdgeRouter-Lite (although I'm not sure what it's multicast is like, haven't played with it personally)

'That VDSL Cat'
7775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1112236 20-Aug-2014 17:00
Send private message

nigelj:
TimA: I couldn't tell you nor know the whole IP range of the IP TV service. Who is to say they change tomorrow or next week? I have some funny feeling about the VM setup. I thought you were running a machine with PF sense not via  VM..


Edit: Network engineer next to me shook his head when he saw the Free BSD + Hyper-V.


I'm also dubious of the VM setup (especially since based on the previous posts it's actually Windows 8+VMWare (not Hyper-V) then pfSense (FreeBSD) in a VM), in fact I want to cry.

Try pfSense on bare metal, or consider getting something like the EdgeRouter-Lite (although I'm not sure what it's multicast is like, haven't played with it personally)


for testing, i see no issue apart from performance with running in a VM.

Assuming Workstations is configured correctly and supported/enabled features, Virtualization is still via VT-d - infact my system outright bluescreens if you virtualize in Workstations without VT-d


for an permanent router replacement Though, i agree, dedicate it to another box.




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


5738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1695

Trusted

  Reply # 1112240 20-Aug-2014 17:04
Send private message

Lol, Its VM Ware. I cringed when i saw the VM too. PF Sense needs to be run on bare metal yes..




Steam: Coil (Same photos as profile here)
Origin: Scranax
Currently playing on PC: Rust, Subnautica, CS:GO, AOE2 HD, BeamNG Drive, BF1.




563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89


  Reply # 1112249 20-Aug-2014 17:12
Send private message

Perhaps you guys could provide a little more rational rather than just being 'dubious'; as to why a VM running on a Dual 6-core Xeon server with 32GB RAM, quad Gigabit NIC etc would perform any more poorly than a HG659?

Most of the internet runs on VMs, I'm getting full speed tests & latency (200/50 <4ms) from other boxes connected through pfSense and did have VFTV streaming at one point last night + HD stream on my PC.

If there is an actual issue with pfSense in VM I would like to know more however currently I think it's more likely due to my limited understanding of multicast and dodgy config.

'That VDSL Cat'
7775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1112251 20-Aug-2014 17:18
Send private message

TimA: Lol, Its VM Ware. I cringed when i saw the VM too. PF Sense needs to be run on bare metal yes..


VMware workstations, thus my shortening to workstations..


you know what i spend all day playing with from the VMware range Tim.. be it a different product from their range.. VMware can push performance when setup right..


but yes, not the best environment for a performance application.. 






#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


854 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 1112255 20-Aug-2014 17:25
Send private message

hio77:
nigelj:
TimA: I couldn't tell you nor know the whole IP range of the IP TV service. Who is to say they change tomorrow or next week? I have some funny feeling about the VM setup. I thought you were running a machine with PF sense not via  VM..


Edit: Network engineer next to me shook his head when he saw the Free BSD + Hyper-V.


I'm also dubious of the VM setup (especially since based on the previous posts it's actually Windows 8+VMWare (not Hyper-V) then pfSense (FreeBSD) in a VM), in fact I want to cry.

Try pfSense on bare metal, or consider getting something like the EdgeRouter-Lite (although I'm not sure what it's multicast is like, haven't played with it personally)


for testing, i see no issue apart from performance with running in a VM.

Assuming Workstations is configured correctly and supported/enabled features, Virtualization is still via VT-d - infact my system outright bluescreens if you virtualize in Workstations without VT-d


for an permanent router replacement Though, i agree, dedicate it to another box.


Not to go too offtopic here, but I'm pretty sure you are refering to VT-x (vmx flag), VT-d is the Directed I/O extension (which would actually be useful here as it could help avoid emulated interrupts, I'm not familiar with VMWare's method here, I've only ever studied the KVM methods at this depth), additionally based on my experience SRIOV is most helpful in network-heavy virtualization tasks.

118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 30


  Reply # 1112257 20-Aug-2014 17:35
Send private message

Pfsense can run on a pentium 2.

I used to run it on and ESXi 3.5 with a pentium 4 and had absolutely no performance issues.

The OP is not seeing any performance bottlenecks either.

The top firewall vendors all have products which run in virtual environment (CheckPoint, Palo Alto, F5).

As such I do not believe virtualisation would be causing any issues here and I think it is perfectly fine to be running pfsense as a VM.

'That VDSL Cat'
7775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1112259 20-Aug-2014 17:36
Send private message

nigelj:
hio77:
nigelj:
TimA: I couldn't tell you nor know the whole IP range of the IP TV service. Who is to say they change tomorrow or next week? I have some funny feeling about the VM setup. I thought you were running a machine with PF sense not via  VM..


Edit: Network engineer next to me shook his head when he saw the Free BSD + Hyper-V.


I'm also dubious of the VM setup (especially since based on the previous posts it's actually Windows 8+VMWare (not Hyper-V) then pfSense (FreeBSD) in a VM), in fact I want to cry.

Try pfSense on bare metal, or consider getting something like the EdgeRouter-Lite (although I'm not sure what it's multicast is like, haven't played with it personally)


for testing, i see no issue apart from performance with running in a VM.

Assuming Workstations is configured correctly and supported/enabled features, Virtualization is still via VT-d - infact my system outright bluescreens if you virtualize in Workstations without VT-d


for an permanent router replacement Though, i agree, dedicate it to another box.


Not to go too offtopic here, but I'm pretty sure you are refering to VT-x (vmx flag), VT-d is the Directed I/O extension (which would actually be useful here as it could help avoid emulated interrupts, I'm not familiar with VMWare's method here, I've only ever studied the KVM methods at this depth), additionally based on my experience SRIOV is most helpful in network-heavy virtualization tasks.


quite possibly, didnt take the time to double check in not mixing the two up as im on my phone..

there are plenty of extensions there to help out, point being though, if your not ticking all the boxes, yes its going to slow right down.


oh and KVM.. scrapping the project we have been doing on there, just doesn't preform quite as well for what we use it for as ESXi does.. theres a right tool for every task i suppose...




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


5738 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1695

Trusted

  Reply # 1112263 20-Aug-2014 17:39
Send private message

When i was load balancing i tried PF Sense in Hyper-V server (Not the client on Server 2008 R2 the actual Hyper-V OS)
Ran like a bag of crap even on a high spec PC. As soon as i installed PF sense on the machine itself it was fine.




Steam: Coil (Same photos as profile here)
Origin: Scranax
Currently playing on PC: Rust, Subnautica, CS:GO, AOE2 HD, BeamNG Drive, BF1.


'That VDSL Cat'
7775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1112267 20-Aug-2014 17:43
Send private message

TimA: When i was load balancing i tried PF Sense in Hyper-V server (Not the client on Server 2008 R2 the actual Hyper-V OS)
Ran like a bag of crap even on a high spec PC. As soon as i installed PF sense on the machine itself it was fine.


in my personal experience, Windows HyperV has always been a little iffy..


if your planning on running a bunch of important things on the same machine, ild look at going with something like ESXi (or a KVM etc Variant) then run windows ontop of that..

Likely it will be the best mix of performance.


As mentioned earlier though, for a router, i wouldnt be too keen to be "timesharing" with other Systems. 




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 30


  Reply # 1112268 20-Aug-2014 17:44
Send private message

Yes, that's Hyper-V ;) plus OP's performance is awesome otherwise...

281 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 23

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1112273 20-Aug-2014 17:55
Send private message

TimA: When i was load balancing i tried PF Sense in Hyper-V server (Not the client on Server 2008 R2 the actual Hyper-V OS)
Ran like a bag of crap even on a high spec PC. As soon as i installed PF sense on the machine itself it was fine.


PFsense 2.1.x and below are based on FreeBSD 8.3 and below which doesn't have true Hyper-V support, proper synthetic drivers etc so this is expected.

The upcoming 2.2 release will be based on FreeBSD 10 which does have Hyper-V support so expect far better performance when it is released.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41


Exhibition to showcase digital artwork from across the globe
Posted 23-May-2018 16:44


Auckland tops list of most vulnerable cities in a zombie apocalypse
Posted 23-May-2018 12:52


ASB first bank in New Zealand to step out with Garmin Pay
Posted 23-May-2018 00:10


Umbrellar becomes Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider
Posted 22-May-2018 15:43


Three New Zealand projects shortlisted in IDC Asia Pacific Smart Cities Awards
Posted 22-May-2018 15:14


UpStarters - the New Zealand tech and innovation story
Posted 21-May-2018 09:55


Lightbox updates platform with new streaming options
Posted 17-May-2018 13:09


Norton Core router launches with high-performance, IoT security in New Zealand
Posted 16-May-2018 02:00


D-Link ANZ launches new 4G LTE Dual SIM M2M VPN Router
Posted 15-May-2018 19:30


New Panasonic LUMIX FT7 ideal for outdoor: waterproof, dustproof
Posted 15-May-2018 19:17


Ryanair Goes All-In on AWS
Posted 15-May-2018 19:14


Te Papa and EQC Minecraft Mod shakes up earthquake education
Posted 15-May-2018 19:12



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.