Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1167241 3-Nov-2014 07:22
Send private message

mattbush: multiply $1.50 times 12 months times the number of customers you think VF will have........and you will see that it has little to do with the cost of paper invoices


Exactly.. The figure of $1.50 is roughly what it costs a large company to print and send a bill, so there is no profiteering there.

There is however the fundamental issue that the $1.50 cost has always been built into the existing plan, whereas now they're trying to move that cost across to the customer.




Andib
1357 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1167253 3-Nov-2014 07:36
Send private message

I have no issue with this, it's what I agreed to when I signed my plan... that vodafone have the right to change the terms of the plan (like all telcos have in their contracts). They could've easily raised the price of everyone's bill by $1.5 if they were out to make money.

ageorge

626 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1167273 3-Nov-2014 08:19
Send private message

sbiddle:

There is however the fundamental issue that the $1.50 cost has always been built into the existing plan, whereas now they're trying to move that cost across to the customer.



My point.
Vodafone demographics: https://www.vodafone.co.nz/our-company/in-new-zealand/
Some quick approximate maths:
1 Million customer base on contract (likely much more)
60% opt out of paper billing, leaving 400,000

Therefore by changing it during a contract, they are making an additional (because it was not part of contract) $600k/month/$7.2M per annum. Not bad eh.

If you were in business would you do this during a contract? I never have and if I receive a quote I expect it to be adhered to.

Thanks to all who commented on this thread. Some worthy comments especially the legal interpretation of it.
Best wishes,
Al.





webwat
2036 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1167285 3-Nov-2014 08:50
Send private message

mattwnz:
tardtasticx:
sidders80: This is not at all different to a situation when mobile providers increase allocation to a certain plan. Lets say when you signed a contract and Vodafone was giving you x amount of minutes and some data as a part of that plan. You signed for 12 months and Vodafone increased the allocation for that plan after 6 months. Now would you expect this change to be applied to your plan from the next billing cycle or once your contract finishes? I guess you would be pissed off if you had to wait till the end of the contract.


But in that case (assuming the provider offered to increase the customers allocation) both parties would obviously agree to the change in terms, because there is no loss whatsoever for the customer, and the provider is the one offering the change so they can't really object either since it was their decision to start with.

Where as in the case of invoices being charged for, the customer will be out of pocket or at a loss (not receiving a paper bill) so therefor they should be able to agree or disagree to the change in their terms. 


They will however have the option to opt out of receiving that invoice, and just have it emailed, which wouldn't incur any additional cost.

But I think that these telcos really need to remember that these people are their cusomters, and are paying their wages. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth of customers, and creates some badwill, when the company maybe paying hundreds, if not thousands per month, and the telco can't absorb a small fee like that. It is not as though their margins are small in most cases either.  Obviously the bean counters in the back room making the decisions think it is worth charging it vs. the badwill it creates.


High margins for internet providers? Don't think that's happened, its been a low margin business ever since Telecom started wholesaling broadband. Internet has become a commodity that requires large numbers of users to pay for the expensive infrastructure. It doesn't make sense for an internet business to be printing/folding paper invoices and paying postage, so obviously customers who have internet also have the means to receive invoices by email, even though not all of them want to.




Time to find a new industry!


ckc

ckc
321 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1167289 3-Nov-2014 08:55
Send private message

The legal interpretation will change for contracts next year, 17th March, with the unfair contracts provisions of the Fair Trading Act coming into force. It will stop provisions in contracts that give one party rights to changes and cancellations without giving the other party those same rights. So for contracts entered into from that date next year (it's not retrospective) there'll be legal recourse through the Commerce Commission to render contract provisions that allow things like this without giving consumers the right to cancel void.

This is partly explaining the trend towards no contract services in gyms, ISPs, Sky, cellphones, etc that's been picking up speed. There has to be a way out of it for both contract parties from March. There's no way out of out now, but the no refund no cancellation clauses will be dead unless both parties have the right to cancel without penalty.

coffeebaron
6213 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1167325 3-Nov-2014 09:47
Send private message

I do wonder why we are back at this issue again. Vodafone tried this a couple of years back then backed down. I agree it's not great to have this extra charge lumped on your bill whist in your contract.
Why did Vodafone not just implement this for all new contracts back when they first tried this? By now the majority of people would be already be paying extra for a paper bill or be getting them by email. Would it have been too hard a couple of years ago as they have since launched several cycles of new plans to simply say your new plan price is for e-billing only, but you can add-on an optional paper bill for $1.50

Problem would have been solved, with very little customer flack.





Rural IT and Broadband support.

 

Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer - one month free: https://www.starlink.com/?referral=RC-32845-88860-71 
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally

 

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com


mattbush
784 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1167518 3-Nov-2014 12:11
Send private message

sbiddle:
mattbush: multiply $1.50 times 12 months times the number of customers you think VF will have........and you will see that it has little to do with the cost of paper invoices


Exactly.. The figure of $1.50 is roughly what it costs a large company to print and send a bill, so there is no profiteering there.

There is however the fundamental issue that the $1.50 cost has always been built into the existing plan, whereas now they're trying to move that cost across to the customer.



If VF were genuinely trying to reduce costs, wouldn't they be better to offer customers a discount to use paperless methods?

But we all know that VF isn't genuine to its customers!!

 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
mattbush
784 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1167519 3-Nov-2014 12:11
Send private message

sbiddle:
mattbush: multiply $1.50 times 12 months times the number of customers you think VF will have........and you will see that it has little to do with the cost of paper invoices


Exactly.. The figure of $1.50 is roughly what it costs a large company to print and send a bill, so there is no profiteering there.

There is however the fundamental issue that the $1.50 cost has always been built into the existing plan, whereas now they're trying to move that cost across to the customer.



If VF were genuinely trying to reduce costs, wouldn't they be better to offer customers a discount to use paperless methods?

But we all know that VF isn't genuine to its customers!!

1 | 2 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Logitech G522 Gaming Headset Review
Posted 18-Jun-2025 17:00


Māori Artists Launch Design Collection with Cricut ahead of Matariki Day
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:19


LG Launches Upgraded webOS Hub With Advanced AI
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:13


One NZ Satellite IoT goes live for customers
Posted 15-Jun-2025 11:10


Bolt Launches in New Zealand
Posted 11-Jun-2025 00:00


Suunto Run Review
Posted 10-Jun-2025 10:44


Freeview Satellite TV Brings HD Viewing to More New Zealanders
Posted 5-Jun-2025 11:50


HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14-inch Review
Posted 3-Jun-2025 14:40


Flip Phones Are Back as HMD Reimagines an Iconic Style
Posted 30-May-2025 17:06


Hundreds of School Students Receive Laptops Through Spark Partnership With Quadrent's Green Lease
Posted 30-May-2025 16:57


AI Report Reveals Trust Is Key to Unlocking Its Potential in Aotearoa
Posted 30-May-2025 16:55


Galaxy Tab S10 FE Series Brings Intelligent Experiences to the Forefront with Premium, Versatile Design
Posted 30-May-2025 16:14


New OPPO Watch X2 Launches in New Zealand
Posted 29-May-2025 16:08


Synology Premiers a New Lineup of Advanced Data Management Solutions
Posted 29-May-2025 16:04


Dyson Launches Its Slimmest Vaccum Cleaner PencilVac
Posted 29-May-2025 15:50









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.