quickymart:ethanbmnz: IMO 100% includes receiving stated speeds at all times, as well as no internet restrictions (no domain name/IP/port blocks). And a 100% uptime.
Okay, I probably went a bit strict, but that is what I would call "100%".
Edit: And the 100% would apply "for the supplier's provided hardware". So you can't blame "your supplier" for not getting 100 megabits per second download when you're connected to a 802.11g router.
While I sympathise somewhat with the situation for cable subscribers affected by congestion, my response to that (as earlier) is "best effort" service. If you want that sort of uptime/speed SLA guarantee, expect to pay a premium for it. You won't get that on a standard home connection, period.
Sure, there's "best effort" and there's "we are not providing even 10% of the advertised service" effort.
There's a problem, works is being carried out. If it's not fixed by end of September, we're lucky there are other providers around and that fibre is coming to our address at around that time.