Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
20578 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3962

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1416558 30-Oct-2015 00:57
Send private message

tardtasticx:
sbiddle: $1.50 for a paper statement would probably not cover the costs.




They could probably halve the costs by not printing a full colour A4 advertisement on the back of the first page of every bill.


That will come out of a marketing budget so is probably actually making it cheaper.

As the volumes go down the price will go up, I think $1.50 is undercharging for it.




Richard rich.ms

11523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5243

Trusted

  Reply # 1416577 30-Oct-2015 07:05
Send private message

The levy is $1 per month, I would lose more than that a month in lost coins etc




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


28 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 1416674 30-Oct-2015 09:26
Send private message

mattwnz: It is interesting that it applies to on account mobile customers and not prepaid. I also thought the amount would be the same per cusomter, no matter which ISP you were with. But maybe Spark makes more revenue that vodafone, if they are charging more (There fee is 2.25 cents more), assuming that they are not making any profit from this levy.


Actually it looks like they're charging identicle amounts.

The 85c excl. GST rate is for Business customers and then there is a 99c incl. GST for regular residential/consumer customers.

Looks like Voda though will be putting it on landline only plans as well though where Spark isn't. Not that that is likely to make a difference to many of us I suppose.



10323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3179

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1417372 30-Oct-2015 21:44
Send private message

What they have failed to do is adequately explain why they are charging it.





642 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 134


  Reply # 1417417 30-Oct-2015 23:13
Send private message

Geektastic: What they have failed to do is adequately explain why they are charging it.


Because they can't justify eating that cost a further 3 years ?

13448 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1616


  Reply # 1417432 30-Oct-2015 23:54
Send private message

Naithin:
mattwnz: It is interesting that it applies to on account mobile customers and not prepaid. I also thought the amount would be the same per cusomter, no matter which ISP you were with. But maybe Spark makes more revenue that vodafone, if they are charging more (There fee is 2.25 cents more), assuming that they are not making any profit from this levy.


Actually it looks like they're charging identicle amounts.

The 85c excl. GST rate is for Business customers and then there is a 99c incl. GST for regular residential/consumer customers.

Looks like Voda though will be putting it on landline only plans as well though where Spark isn't. Not that that is likely to make a difference to many of us I suppose.


It's 97.75 cents inc GST, not 99c, at least accounting to my calculations (eg 85c  x 1.15 = 97.75c). Unless my maths is wrong, if the provider for example has 1 million customers, that is $270,000 per year difference for the the ISP charging $1, over the one charging 85cents+gst, due to the additional 2.25 cents being charged a month. (eg (2.25c x 12 /100) x 1 million = $270,000. That isn't an insignificant amount.



10323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3179

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1423240 8-Nov-2015 18:13
Send private message

loceff13:
Geektastic: What they have failed to do is adequately explain why they are charging it.


Because they can't justify eating that cost a further 3 years ?


They should simply be blending it into their charges. They do not list how much I pay towards their salary bill, their corporate tax, their audit fees etc - why do they need to list this apparently compulsory charge (to their business) on my bill?





854 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 1423241 8-Nov-2015 18:22
2 people support this post
Send private message

Geektastic:
loceff13:
Geektastic: What they have failed to do is adequately explain why they are charging it.


Because they can't justify eating that cost a further 3 years ?


They should simply be blending it into their charges. They do not list how much I pay towards their salary bill, their corporate tax, their audit fees etc - why do they need to list this apparently compulsory charge (to their business) on my bill?


Simple:  Because it's a levy that they didn't expect to be renewed at the start of many contracts, they can use this method for two things, the first is to make a political statement of "If you don't like it, complain to your MP" the second is to avoid any contractual issues that result in a price increase (I'd actually have to look, but I've got a feeling that government imposed fees/levies generally are an out-clause (edit:) for the company to just go ahead and charge it without allowing contract breaks.).



10323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3179

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1424028 9-Nov-2015 22:19
Send private message

What we still (unless we work in the industry I guess) do not know is WHAT the levy is for. What are we getting in return? Of what use is whatever is being funded? Etc.

We get levies for some BS electricity thing too and none of them seem to actually DO or ACHIEVE anything whatsoever.





854 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 1424051 9-Nov-2015 23:47
Send private message

Geektastic: What we still (unless we work in the industry I guess) do not know is WHAT the levy is for. What are we getting in return? Of what use is whatever is being funded? Etc.

We get levies for some BS electricity thing too and none of them seem to actually DO or ACHIEVE anything whatsoever.


Telecommunications Levy is http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0103/latest/DLM127120.html if you want specifics of what it's funded, it's only an OIA request away to the relevant Ministry/Minister.  (EDIT:  done...)

The Energy Authority levies are more obvious as it pretty much funds, well, the Energy Authority and all the market management that they do. (See http://www.ea.govt.nz/)

1367 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 478


  Reply # 1424052 9-Nov-2015 23:53
Send private message

There's a consultation document here on what the TDL money is to be used for. I couldn't find the result of that consultation though.

302 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 34

Subscriber

  Reply # 1424109 10-Nov-2015 07:57
One person supports this post
Send private message

If 2D can "break" my contract price and add 85c to it, why can't they break it and double my data?  I'm on a $49 contract with 1.25GB data, currently that is 2.5GB of data, rather annoying.



10323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3179

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1424135 10-Nov-2015 09:15
Send private message

nigelj:
Geektastic: What we still (unless we work in the industry I guess) do not know is WHAT the levy is for. What are we getting in return? Of what use is whatever is being funded? Etc.

We get levies for some BS electricity thing too and none of them seem to actually DO or ACHIEVE anything whatsoever.


Telecommunications Levy is http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0103/latest/DLM127120.html if you want specifics of what it's funded, it's only an OIA request away to the relevant Ministry/Minister.  (EDIT:  done...)

The Energy Authority levies are more obvious as it pretty much funds, well, the Energy Authority and all the market management that they do. (See http://www.ea.govt.nz/)


All of those things should be funded from general taxation - if they are required at all. This whole levy thing is just an additional cost in collection, administration and distribution.





1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.