Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


BDFL - Memuneh
61516 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12236

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 202035 14-Sep-2016 15:55
2 people support this post
Send private message

Just received:

 

 

Vodafone New Zealand Limited has today been fined $165,000 in the Auckland District Court after pleading guilty to making false price representations in breach of the Fair Trading Act.

The Commerce Commission filed charges against Vodafone in May this year related to invoices sent to customers who signed on to the ‘Red Essentials’ mobile phone plan between January and December 2014.

Vodafone launched the Red Essentials plan at $79 (including GST) per month in August 2013 and subsequently reduced the price to $69 in January 2014 in response to market competition. However, Vodafone's billing system did not accurately apply this $10 discount to customers who signed up to the Red Essentials plan from its introduction through to December 2014, causing misleading invoices to be sent to approximately 15,000 customers.

Affected customers were collectively overcharged approximately $92,000, though the majority of customers were overcharged by less than $1 each.

Commissioner Anna Rawlings said customers had since been refunded the amounts they were overcharged.

“It is vital that businesses invest in making sure they have strong compliance processes that can support these types of promotional offers, particularly when selling products to a significant customer base,” Ms Rawlings said.

“Consumers rely on companies to invoice and debit them accurately, as many do not check the finer details. Overcharging a large number of customers a small amount can result in firms receiving large sums of money they are not entitled to, so they need to be vigilant to avoid misleading consumers and breaching the Act.”

 





Create new topic
45 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 1630518 14-Sep-2016 20:59
Send private message

OUCH. Though Telco billing is nightmarish


8 posts

Wannabe Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 1630604 15-Sep-2016 06:56
Send private message

So if I understood this right, VF initially charged $79 for the plan then reduced it by $10 to $69 but failed to reflect this on invoices so customers paid $79 anyway?


4485 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2477

Trusted

  Reply # 1630612 15-Sep-2016 08:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

That's a couple less expensive boozy corporate lunches for them I guess.


18536 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5306

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1630650 15-Sep-2016 09:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

DarthKermit:

 

That's a couple less expensive boozy corporate lunches for them I guess.

 

 

 

 

Oh Yawn. This tired old one getting wheeled out again? Gimme a break!

 

 

 

 


Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.