Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
aarond

33 posts

Geek


  #137381 11-Jun-2008 16:12
Send private message

Fantasitc, thanks for your detailed response. I appreciate it.

So, the sceptic in me asks, whats is the down side? If it can hand the audio portion of the call back to WxC part way through the call, then this would seem the ideal solution to me. Why is Asterisk not configured by default to do this, or does it just need a little more configuration on my part to make this work?

How would I configure it so I could try this out?

Cheers
Aaron

 
 
 
 

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).
cisconz
cisconz
1337 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #137415 11-Jun-2008 17:08
Send private message

aarond: Fantasitc, thanks for your detailed response. I appreciate it.

So, the sceptic in me asks, whats is the down side? If it can hand the audio portion of the call back to WxC part way through the call, then this would seem the ideal solution to me. Why is Asterisk not configured by default to do this, or does it just need a little more configuration on my part to make this work?

How would I configure it so I could try this out?

Cheers
Aaron


There is no downside, this takes the audio processing off the asterisk.
As to how to configure it I would ask TonyH as he knows a lot more about asterisk than me.
I know about SIP as I sell and support the Epygi Quadro's ( http://www.3bit.co.nz ) .

Cheers




Hmmmm


tonyhughes
Hawkes Bay
8476 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #137470 11-Jun-2008 20:20
Send private message

Back in here by request.

David - don't assume I know too much more about Asterisk :-P I can be a bit of a jack-of-all-trades at times! (And the proverbial master of feck-all).

Aaron, I would suggest that the number of people who are totally happy with Trixbox in a VM at desktop class with gimped upload speeds are the minority.

I would rather see you on a $50 dedicated 1.5GHz/512MB Celery/P4/AMD from Trademe than using a VM. VMs are great for home non-production setups, and sandboxes.

Even if you just borrowed a box and set it up for S&Gs to see if your latency issue disappears.

I suspect that low upstream bandwidth and your codec choice is the likely culprit, but being in a VM, you just can't discount that as an issue.

Cheers,
Tony









aarond

33 posts

Geek


  #137480 11-Jun-2008 20:56
Send private message

OK, I agree :) I have proven to my own satisfaction that Trixbox works, VFX seems to be working for simple calling without any issue. I am probably pushing the envelope of a VM image, so if I want to really use some of the more advanced features Asterisk has to offer, I need to put it on a dedicated box.

So, I have another PC similarly spec'ed to my WHS server. I will install Trixbox on this over the next few days. Will report back my findings for others coming after me :)

Out of curiosity, you imply part of my problem is codec choice. What codec would you recommend? Do you use g729 yourself?

Now I am just trying to source some additional hardware - FXO (for playing with connecting to my existing POTS line), ATA device (I previously had a WAG54GPv2, but it overheated and the router stopped working. Bit useless without it!) Back to the research! Thanks for your input.

Aaron

aarond

33 posts

Geek


  #137570 12-Jun-2008 11:13
Send private message

WOW... thats all I can say!

Last night a speedtest showed an upstream connection of 3Mbps down and 138kbps up. Not great, but average. This morning a speedtest shows connection speeds of 3Mbps down and 700kbps up - so my Flood connection has kicked in.

With great anticipation, I tried out various forms of call forwarding. Including follow me and DISA with an external call. Boy, what a difference. All latency has gone, the line is crystal clear!

I would call this a resounding success (for now!). For the moment, I'm going to leave the VM ware image running as is, perhaps tweak it by increasing the process priority, and try it out for another week or so.

As you can tell, I've very excited!! (My wife would be rolling her eyes all over the place Laughing) Now I can concentrate on better network hardware instead.

Aaron

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

New Suunto Run Available in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 13-May-2025 21:00


Cricut Maker 4 Review
Posted 12-May-2025 15:18


Dynabook Launches Ultra-Light Portégé Z40L-N Copilot+PC with Self-Replaceable Battery
Posted 8-May-2025 14:08


Shopify Sidekick Gets a Major Reasoning Upgrade, Plus Free Image Generation
Posted 8-May-2025 14:03


Microsoft Introduces New Surface Copilot+ PCs
Posted 8-May-2025 13:56


D-Link A/NZ launches DWR-933M 4G+ LTE Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 Mobile Hotspot
Posted 8-May-2025 13:49


Synology Expands DiskStation Lineup with DS1825+ and DS1525+
Posted 8-May-2025 13:44


JBL Releases Next Generation Flip 7 and Charge 6
Posted 8-May-2025 13:41


Arlo Unveils All-New PoE Adapter With Enhanced Connectivity
Posted 8-May-2025 13:36


Fujifilm Instax Mini 41 Review
Posted 2-May-2025 10:12


Synology DS925+ Review
Posted 23-Apr-2025 15:00


Synology Announces DiskStation DS925+ and DX525 Expansion Unit
Posted 23-Apr-2025 10:34


JBL Tour Pro 3 Review
Posted 22-Apr-2025 16:56


Samsung 9100 Pro NVMe SSD Review
Posted 11-Apr-2025 13:11


Motorola Announces New Mid-tier Phones moto g05 and g15
Posted 4-Apr-2025 00:00









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.







Backblaze unlimited backup