![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
markdr: Release notes anyone?
foamfollower:
I had a pleasant surprise when I was halfway through programming my Logotech Harmony remote for the T-Box – I received a message saying that there was similar device in the database: Manufacturer – TelstraClear, Model – T-Box. I accepted the programming and it seems to work well, inceasing considerably the WAF.
Apologies if this has already been noted, although I have seen reference here that the T-Box was not in the Harmony database. May be a recent addition.
ralphski:Russcolli:
Obvious bugs and promised software updates aside the one I really did not understand was the bit about Padding. It suggests that using padding can cause recordings to fail??? I don't get it, either there is a recording conflict or there isn't. Surely the recorder should not accept future recordings if they conflict (i.e. more than two at the same) even with padding.
'You can change the padding to anything higher than 0, however this can cause 'false' conflicts on some recordings and may cause some recordings to fail. '
Yes having the padding buffer set higher than 0 can cause conflicts.
E.G.
Lets say a padding buffer is set to 5 minutes (which is 5 minutes before & after scheduled screening time)
You've set-up recording of 1 News & 3 News every weekday (1800-1900) but your padding is set for 5 minutes so your actual recording time is 1755-1905 on CH1 & CH3.
So, now the lovely lady decides she wants to record Shortland Street weedays from 1900-1930 on CH2
The T-Box has 3 tuners & can record 2 tuners at a once... Shortland Street will fail because it going to try & start recording at 1855 while the news coverage is still recording (and will do until 1905).
Hope this helps.
TelstraClear: We have rolled out new software overnight for the TelstraClear T-Box.
Internet is my backyard...
«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»
Please read the Geekzone's FUG
Internet is my backyard...
«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»
Please read the Geekzone's FUG
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |