![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
jnawk: Activity on the server indicates he's running some tests. No results (that I've seen) yet.
jpollock:jnawk: Activity on the server indicates he's running some tests. No results (that I've seen) yet.
ooooh, [little dance of anticipation] :)?
jnawk: (Told him to go easy on my connection given I'm 14GB over the limit already - too much copying of 100Mb rubbish files testing all this stuff!!)
DonGould:jnawk:? (Told him to go easy on my connection given I'm 14GB over the limit already - too much copying of 100Mb rubbish files testing all this stuff!!)
I hope TC make some consideration given all the testing time you've put in to fault find an issue with their network that should eventually benefit them as must as you?
jnawk:
So do I. However, thus far, he's not logged in to either my box or my friend's..
DonGould:jnawk:
So do I. However, thus far, he's not logged in to either my box or my friend's..
:) Give him a chance.? I'm sure he's building a test plan first and figuring a simulation.
D
--
Please note all comments are the product of my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
Talkiet: To keep in perspective though, you're complaining about a residential broadband service with no performance SLAs only being able to achieve 3-4mbps on a single thread, when with multiple threads you can still max out the connection?
I agree that it's a little odd, but it's hardly the worst example of a broadband 'fault' I have ever seen.
To clarify, yes, I agree there's something a little odd here, but performance is by no means actually bad - and there is (presumably) no performance SLAs associated with this product... TCL are going WAY above and beyond in the level of troubleshooting they are giving this IMO.
Cheers - N
Talkiet: To keep in perspective
TCL are going WAY above and beyond in the level of troubleshooting they are giving this IMO.
Talkiet: To keep in perspective though, you're complaining about a residential broadband service with no performance SLAs only being able to achieve 3-4mbps on a single thread, when with multiple threads you can still max out the connection?
I agree that it's a little odd, but it's hardly the worst example of a broadband 'fault' I have ever seen.
To clarify, yes, I agree there's something a little odd here, but performance is by no means actually bad - and there is (presumably) no performance SLAs associated with this product... TCL are going WAY above and beyond in the level of troubleshooting they are giving this IMO.
Cheers - N
jnawk:
That post has been informative for me - should TelstraClear fail to resolve the matter, I'll be looking elsewhere, and now I've narrowed the list by one provider. Thanks for that, Mr. Telecom.
Apparently I can't say sh*t here. Sorry.
--
Please note all comments are the product of my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
jpollock:Talkiet: To keep in perspective though, you're complaining about a residential broadband service with no performance SLAs only being able to achieve 3-4mbps on a single thread, when with multiple threads you can still max out the connection?
I agree that it's a little odd, but it's hardly the worst example of a broadband 'fault' I have ever seen.
To clarify, yes, I agree there's something a little odd here, but performance is by no means actually bad - and there is (presumably) no performance SLAs associated with this product... TCL are going WAY above and beyond in the level of troubleshooting they are giving this IMO.
Cheers - N
Telstra Clear repeatedly states that they don't shape the connection in any way shape or form. Given that they charge per byte, they have no reason to.
So, this means that their service doesn't match their published statements, and as such they must either fix the service or refund the fee.
This sort of "bug" is exactly what got Telecom into hot water with the regulator.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |