Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




36 posts

Geek


Topic # 179127 27-Aug-2015 14:28
Send private message

I'm building a new PC which has an SSD as system drive then a pair of 2TB hard drives for data. I was planning to mirror using RAID 1, but the question is whether I use hardware RAID (motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H) or use Storage Spaces under Windows 10.

I've heard murmurs of poor performance under Storage Spaces but on the other hand hardware RAID is often harder to set up.

What is the wisdom of the crowd? Anyone used Storage Spaces under Win10?

Cheers,

Martin

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic
365 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 53


  Reply # 1375280 27-Aug-2015 16:15
One person supports this post
Send private message

The hardware raid isn't true hardware raid on those boards as it requires an OS driver to work and uses the main CPU for processing. Raid 1 is very easy to setup on most machines but my experiences with these sort of hybrid cards hasn't been great, my preference is for pure hardware raid wherever possible.

JWR

731 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 236


  Reply # 1375334 27-Aug-2015 17:31
One person supports this post
Send private message


I would use Storage Spaces.

  - It's easier to setup and maintain.
  - More flexible to extend things in the future.
  - Performance will be about the same for both cases. Storage Spaces may even be quicker for RAID 1.

As Mattmannz pointed out, both are software solutions.

/edit: btw only used Storage Spaces on Server 2012. But, Microsoft must have confidence, if they put it in Server.

 
 
 
 


73 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13


  Reply # 1379440 3-Sep-2015 22:52
Send private message

Ive used Storage Spaces for nearly 2 years now (windows 8.1) and thats after using the integrated raid controller on Motherboards (mainly intel) for about 3-4 years.

Storage Spaces
Storage spaces has terrible performance in Raid 5 (parity set up). 
Raid 0 and 1 (mirrored and striped) has ok performance (bursts around the 100-120MB/s mark)
Great for moving the drives between Windows based machines (ie take out your storage spaces HDDs and plug them into any other Win 8/.1/10 computer and Storage Spaces will work as it always has. 
Parity (raid 5) is extremely slow in Storage Spaces (around the 30-40MB/s burst mark). Do not use unless its for backups of some sort. I havent tested it in Win 10 though to see if its improved. 

Integrated raid controller on MB
Faster performance in Raid 0, 1, 1+0 and Raid 5 than storage spaces. Raid 0 will burst to around 150-180Mbs. 
Its not a "true" hardware based raid but they usually have a chip on the MB for the raid controller but offloads the processes to the CPU. 
If you change motherboards be prepared to lose your raid (and all data on the drives). I learnt the hard way going to a diff MB with a diff Storage controller chip. Lost 3TB of data. 

12586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2025

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1379488 4-Sep-2015 07:31
Send private message

I've used storage spaces for a year or so, set up as 2x4TB in a mirror. They work well. I have it set to protect both files and directory information, which I don't think is the default. I think there is some performance overhead for random reads, but all in all it works just like a regularly hard drive and is easily fast enough for both day to day computing and dealing with 1000 RAW images at a time (20GB or so of data).




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16


Mandatory data breach reporting in Australia
Posted 13-Jun-2017 11:30



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.