Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


ottenpat

73 posts

Master Geek


#114145 10-Feb-2013 12:26
Send private message

Hello
This pack of sausages came home in the shopping tooday from PacknSave GI this morning.  You will note the label clearly is advertising as Premium and 95% Fat free yet when I look at the nutritional panel it says 6% fat.

I do not think it is actually legal to falsely advertise like this.  I would have thought a store like PacknSave would known better or have the PacknSave marketers got a loophole I am not aware off.

Patrick



Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #758921 10-Feb-2013 12:31
Send private message

g is for grams not %

scottjpalmer
Minimalist
5657 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #758923 10-Feb-2013 12:33
Send private message

johnr: g is for grams not %


6g of fat per 100g of sausage is 6% where I went to school :-)

 
 
 
 


johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #758925 10-Feb-2013 12:36
Send private message

scottjpalmer:
johnr: g is for grams not %


6g of fat per 100g of sausage is 6% where I went to school :-)


Crap it is to, Should of got more sleep last night

mattwnz
16832 posts

Uber Geek


  #758930 10-Feb-2013 12:37
Send private message

Make a complaint to the commerce commission. Last time I did they followed it up with the manufacturer.

ottenpat

73 posts

Master Geek


  #758936 10-Feb-2013 12:57
Send private message

I actually don't think the manufacturer has actually done anything wrong and 6% fat for a sausage is still pretty good when you compare to some of the nasty bangers out there.  It is PacknSave Glenn Innes that have used its poetic licence when they have slapped on their dubios label.

Patrick

sbiddle
29270 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #758942 10-Feb-2013 13:23
Send private message

The issue lies with Pak 'n Save. They have a generic list of PLU numbers and somebody just decided to use the one that says 95% fat free.


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
68818 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #758951 10-Feb-2013 13:42
Send private message

95% fat free doesn't mean it contains 5%. It means it less fat than other similar products.

The problem is that marketing use this as some magical "healthier than thou" label.




 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Coinbase | TheMarket | My technology disclosure


 
 
 
 


sleemanj
1345 posts

Uber Geek


  #758955 10-Feb-2013 13:53
Send private message

I've encountered nutritional labelling inaccuracy at P&S and Countdown.

The worst was at P&S on an in-store printed nutritional label (some piece of hot food I think), I forget the details but the numbers were clearly and wildly incorrect (far more so than in this case).

The countdown one was on some Signature Range sausages if I remember correctly.

Moral of the story, read the nutritional information, and at least do a sanity check in your head, especially for in-store and house brand printed labels.




---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


Batman
Mad Scientist
23058 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #758962 10-Feb-2013 14:00
Send private message

maybe like the horsemeat saga (apparently beef burger needs to be something like 60% beef or something in some european countries hence horsemeat is ok for the rest etc)

maybe 95% fat free definition is 6% or less fat haha ... someone can check if they want :p

or perhaps there is no definition ...




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


richms
23655 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #758978 10-Feb-2013 14:31
Send private message

Or they are doing the 95% by volume or something?




Richard rich.ms

mattwnz
16832 posts

Uber Geek


  #758988 10-Feb-2013 14:48
Send private message

freitasm: 95% fat free doesn't mean it contains 5%. It means it less fat than other similar products.

The problem is that marketing use this as some magical "healthier than thou" label.


I think if they are claiming a certain percentage, it has to be fairly exact, but in this case it is the figures that appear to contradict one another. I think you are referring to what is often regarded as "puffery'

Regarding PnS, I have had a problem with their scales accuracy in their fruit and vege  dept, on their self serve printing scales. On some expensive light weight fruit and vege items, like garlic for example,  you can easily get $1 difference in cost between the different scales.

ottenpat

73 posts

Master Geek


  #759005 10-Feb-2013 15:18
Send private message

freitasm: 95% fat free doesn't mean it contains 5%. It means it less fat than other similar products.

The problem is that marketing use this as some magical "healthier than thou" label.



I think that when a label(the P&S one) claims to be 95% fat free that this is the minimum requirement. i.e. It cannot contain more than 5% fat.

I can label 95% fat free and have 4% or 3% fat but the rules are that they are not allowed to go above 5% to be compliant.

They can prove compliance over an entire batch through the average composition with they are worried they are going to be busted on a one off test on one sausage if the are worried the batch is not uniform.

Patrick

blackjack17
1128 posts

Uber Geek


  #759028 10-Feb-2013 15:57
Send private message

Good god, you are talking about 1g of fat here.  

It is hardly false advertising, it's an incorrect label, it happens, and if you do file with the commerce commission I hope they prosecute for wasting the court's time.




mattwnz
16832 posts

Uber Geek


  #759033 10-Feb-2013 16:11
Send private message

blackjack17: Good god, you are talking about 1g of fat here.  

It is hardly false advertising, it's an incorrect label, it happens, and if you do file with the commerce commission I hope they prosecute for wasting the court's time.


Doesn't sound like you know the process. They will usually contact the retailer about it to correct the problem, and that is often as far as it goes. It however depends on how many other complaints they have received  about similar problems. So reporting is a good thing to do, as otherwise they may not even be aware of these sorts of problems. 

networkn
23447 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #759039 10-Feb-2013 16:24
Send private message

mattwnz: Make a complaint to the commerce commission. Last time I did they followed it up with the manufacturer.


Over a 1% fat difference? Seriously, would he or she have opted not to buy it if it had said 6% fat? 

Give me a break, let the commerce commission deal with stuff that actually matters. If it had been 5% off, sure.

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS1621+ 
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32


NordVPN starts deploying colocated servers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 09:00


Google introduces Nest Wifi routers in New Zealand
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Orcon to bundle Google Nest Wifi router with new accounts
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Epay and Centrapay partner to create digital gift cards
Posted 2-Oct-2020 17:34


Inseego launches 5G MiFi M2000 mobile hotspot
Posted 2-Oct-2020 14:53









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.