Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 190

Subscriber

Topic # 114745 1-Mar-2013 13:12
Send private message

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10868425

Thoughts? 
Proposed personal use tax on employer supplied devices. Just when you thought everything is pretty much taxed..here comes this beauty. 

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 772264 1-Mar-2013 13:28
Send private message

What a silly idea. SO many holes in it.

And why is it only limited to tablets and smartphones? Surely it should also be applied then to desk phones and desktops in the office?

3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 772270 1-Mar-2013 13:41
Send private message

It's ridiculous.  It will cost so much and be so much effort for companies to administer, they will simply stop providing these essential items to employees - which will harm productivity.  And for what?  Some pittance of tax?  This government need to get a life.  How about spending the effort going after massive tax evaders instead of nickel-and-diming everyone?

 
 
 
 


1711 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 830


  Reply # 772271 1-Mar-2013 13:43
Send private message

What regressive thinking. It's 2013 for goodness sake. Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay. Employees need technology and communications to work in this way and the lines between personal and business use of these things becomes blurred very quickly. The government and its agencies should be encouraging 'work from home' policies ? It's greener, reduces traffic congestion and increase productivity.

Edit:btw, why is it that when you paste into the quick reply box from another editor it turns an apostrophe into a question mark.




Most of the trouble in the world is caused by people wanting to be important. (T.S. Eliot)


2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 772279 1-Mar-2013 14:08
Send private message

floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo

3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 772284 1-Mar-2013 14:15
Send private message

Klipspringer:
floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo


And CEOs of companies which are actually successful are saying they're doing the complete wrong thing...

2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 772291 1-Mar-2013 14:24
Send private message

ubergeeknz:
Klipspringer:
floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo


And CEOs of companies which are actually successful are saying they're doing the complete wrong thing...


I don't know. Part of me agrees with Marissa Mayer.
From my experience, people working from home tend to slack off quiet conciderably. We use to allow it, but now we allow it on a case by case bases only.

Back to topic ...


6340 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1100

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 772294 1-Mar-2013 14:26
Send private message

floydbloke: Edit:btw, why is it that when you paste into the quick reply box from another editor it turns an apostrophe into a question mark.

Technically, it doesn't. It turns an extended character that looks like an apostrophe into a question mark :)

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 772299 1-Mar-2013 14:39
Send private message

Klipspringer: What a silly idea. SO many holes in it.

And why is it only limited to tablets and smartphones? Surely it should also be applied then to desk phones and desktops in the office?


read the article:

"The tax would apply "when there is a mixed work and private expense that is more than incidental private use", the department said in a recent discussion document."



so it is for items provided by the company which are also used a lot for personal use.  Unless you take your desk phone home every day then it wouldn't apply.  Making theodd personal call from your deskphone or doing your internet banking from your work desktop would count as incidental usage.

likewise, if they provide you with a mobile or laptop which is ONLY used for work purposes and you keep all your personal usage separate by having your own laptop or phone, then that would also not be taxed.

theoretically it's just an extension of the normal fringe benefit tax,
specifically: anything provided by the employer for their employees work that has only inccidental (minimal) personal use should not count as 'income' for that person.
But if an employer provides something for their employee that the employee uses for their own personal use in a more than incidental manner, then it should be taxed as income, ideally inproportion to it;s work/personal usage. If it did not work this way, then employers could get around their employees paying income tax by providing all sorts of things like cars,


That said, it is a stupid idea that will be very easy to get around and just add huge costs for businesses unable/unwilling to get around it.

Mad Scientist
19315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2524

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 772314 1-Mar-2013 15:09
Send private message

Hmm we are copying Australia when it suits the govt




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


2627 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 613

Trusted

  Reply # 772315 1-Mar-2013 15:10
Send private message

Klipspringer: 
I don't know. Part of me agrees with Marissa Mayer.
From my experience, people working from home tend to slack off quiet conciderably. We use to allow it, but now we allow it on a case by case bases only.



I've been working from home fulltime since 2007. It may not be for everyone, but it is certainly possible to have a productive work environment at home.

Scott Hanselman recently blogged about this.

1255 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 772379 1-Mar-2013 16:47
Send private message

It's a ridiculous idea.

There is already FBT which is silly enough in itself if you ask me.

If they start going down that road, then people would be quite justified in wanting to claim expenses for their personal things which might sometimes be used in the course of doing business, then we descend into the maze like taxation systems that other countries have.

When it comes to tax, K.I.S.S! Complicated regimes just lead to less compliance.




---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


18698 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5350

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 772387 1-Mar-2013 17:25
Send private message

Klipspringer:
ubergeeknz:
Klipspringer:
floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo


And CEOs of companies which are actually successful are saying they're doing the complete wrong thing...


I don't know. Part of me agrees with Marissa Mayer.
From my experience, people working from home tend to slack off quiet conciderably. We use to allow it, but now we allow it on a case by case bases only.

Back to topic ...



This! We see so many employment issues as IT Providers, for workers who work from home. Complications all over the place. 

4993 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1327

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 772436 1-Mar-2013 19:52
Send private message

Klipspringer:
ubergeeknz:
Klipspringer:
floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo


And CEOs of companies which are actually successful are saying they're doing the complete wrong thing...


I don't know. Part of me agrees with Marissa Mayer.
From my experience, people working from home tend to slack off quiet conciderably. We use to allow it, but now we allow it on a case by case bases only.

Back to topic ...



sucks but seems like a great way for a potentially dying business like Yahoo to shed staff through forced attrition

2584 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1237


  Reply # 772482 1-Mar-2013 21:24
Send private message

It's a good idea in principle, but a stupid idea in practice. Won't raise much money, and anything it does achieve will be dramatically out of proportion to the administrative and compliance costs it creates.

18698 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5350

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 772511 1-Mar-2013 22:35
Send private message

No, it will force companies to refuse to allow laptops to be used for personal use at all. They will apply very strict policies related to what they can install and write staff letters telling them that use of the laptop for anything personal is a breach of their employment contract. Simple really.

 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.