Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
241 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 61


  Reply # 773698 2-Mar-2013 20:01
Send private message

Simple really, turn your work devices off at closing time and back on when you start

2580 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 673

Subscriber

  Reply # 773790 3-Mar-2013 04:55
Send private message

A little off topic but related: I have often wondered about the situation where employees who do large amounts of international business travel are able to rack up huge volumes of Air Points Dollars and then use them to take expensive overseas personal holidays with their spouse/partner with 'free' airfares. The APD's are paid for by the employer and used tax-free by the employee. Often the original business travel is done in Business Class which generates high levels of APD's. My understanding is that all this does not attract Fringe Benefit Tax and I could never figure out why.

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 773800 3-Mar-2013 08:48
Send private message

eracode: A little off topic but related: I have often wondered about the situation where employees who do large amounts of international business travel are able to rack up huge volumes of Air Points Dollars and then use them to take expensive overseas personal holidays with their spouse/partner with 'free' airfares. The APD's are paid for by the employer and used tax-free by the employee. Often the original business travel is done in Business Class which generates high levels of APD's. My understanding is that all this does not attract Fringe Benefit Tax and I could never figure out why.


Probably something to do with the incidental nature of getting apds asa result of flying. also the fact that they are at no cost to the employer

7807 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 779

Subscriber

  Reply # 773802 3-Mar-2013 08:56
Send private message

I guess soon the IRD will want all telco to supply itemized cell fone accounts so that employers can ask their staff to go thru them and mark what are personal calls and what are business. You'll then be expected to pay for the personal calls.

I've seen this in one company I worked at with normal fone calls.




Regards,

Old3eyes


6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 773861 3-Mar-2013 12:45
Send private message

old3eyes: I guess soon the IRD will want all telco to supply itemized cell fone accounts so that employers can ask their staff to go thru them and mark what are personal calls and what are business. You'll then be expected to pay for the personal calls.

I've seen this in one company I worked at with normal fone calls.


When I worked in an accounting dept in the uk at a large legal firm this exact thing happened. At that point many years ago only the top brass had phones, so you had the ridiculous situation of these high flyers taking probably 100 quid or more worth of billable hours out of their day to go over a phone bill and highlight 5 quids worth of personal calls, then going down to the accounts department and handing over the cash to the accounts receivable guy (me). Absurd.

gzt

9834 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1472


  Reply # 773877 3-Mar-2013 13:35
Send private message

My guess is that was expense accounting but either way it would be easy enough to use a dialler app to keep track of that these days.

The Herald article is short on detail. This is the original IRD discussion paper published in November.. The relevant part starts around page 36.

I guess the taxman is concerned these devices and associated communication costs are being provided as an untaxed salary benefit in some cases.

Even so, there are numerous references in the paper to incidental personal use and the kind of use that is not worth the cost of compliance monitoring. I personally doubt IRD intends what is being promoted in the press.

Providing portable [network] policy compliant communications devices increases availability and provides the opportunity to use time effectively and with flexibility. Personal use is incidental in that context.

2162 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 653

Subscriber

  Reply # 773880 3-Mar-2013 13:58
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
old3eyes: I guess soon the IRD will want all telco to supply itemized cell fone accounts so that employers can ask their staff to go thru them and mark what are personal calls and what are business. You'll then be expected to pay for the personal calls.

I've seen this in one company I worked at with normal fone calls.


When I worked in an accounting dept in the uk at a large legal firm this exact thing happened. At that point many years ago only the top brass had phones, so you had the ridiculous situation of these high flyers taking probably 100 quid or more worth of billable hours out of their day to go over a phone bill and highlight 5 quids worth of personal calls, then going down to the accounts department and handing over the cash to the accounts receivable guy (me). Absurd.


This is exactly what happens at the law firm I work for. Except partners just give the form to their PA and tell them to figure it out. If the personal bill is under $10 they don't worry about it. 

3584 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1142


  Reply # 773892 3-Mar-2013 14:22
Send private message

sleemanj: It's a ridiculous idea.

There is already FBT which is silly enough in itself if you ask me.

If they start going down that road, then people would be quite justified in wanting to claim expenses for their personal things which might sometimes be used in the course of doing business, then we descend into the maze like taxation systems that other countries have.

When it comes to tax, K.I.S.S! Complicated regimes just lead to less compliance.


I've heard it commented that the US can just about catch anyone out on tax matters due to their system being so hideously complex. 

2484 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1140


  Reply # 773915 3-Mar-2013 16:25
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
old3eyes: I guess soon the IRD will want all telco to supply itemized cell fone accounts so that employers can ask their staff to go thru them and mark what are personal calls and what are business. You'll then be expected to pay for the personal calls.

I've seen this in one company I worked at with normal fone calls.


When I worked in an accounting dept in the uk at a large legal firm this exact thing happened. At that point many years ago only the top brass had phones, so you had the ridiculous situation of these high flyers taking probably 100 quid or more worth of billable hours out of their day to go over a phone bill and highlight 5 quids worth of personal calls, then going down to the accounts department and handing over the cash to the accounts receivable guy (me). Absurd.


It was like that at my old employer, and we had to pay if it was over $5 for the month. While I have had to carry a work phone for most of the last 18 years (don't at the moment), I always carry a personal one as well and use it for all personal calls. It's just much less hassle.

2966 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 446

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 774112 4-Mar-2013 09:38
Send private message

surfisup1000:
sleemanj: It's a ridiculous idea.

There is already FBT which is silly enough in itself if you ask me.

If they start going down that road, then people would be quite justified in wanting to claim expenses for their personal things which might sometimes be used in the course of doing business, then we descend into the maze like taxation systems that other countries have.

When it comes to tax, K.I.S.S! Complicated regimes just lead to less compliance.


I've heard it commented that the US can just about catch anyone out on tax matters due to their system being so hideously complex. 


Yup.  Even leaving the country doesn't protect you, since you're meant to pay tax on money earned everywhere from every place.

Hell, renouncing US citizenship doesn't even do it, since they apparently don't have to recognise your renunciation.

592 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 109


  Reply # 774478 4-Mar-2013 18:24
Send private message

JimmyH:
It was like that at my old employer, and we had to pay if it was over $5 for the month. While I have had to carry a work phone for most of the last 18 years (don't at the moment), I always carry a personal one as well and use it for all personal calls. It's just much less hassle.


I couldn't think of anything worse than carrying two phones. I work for a Telco and if I had to separate personal from work calls (I think I have 1000 minutes, 1.5GB or something, I should know!) I would use two and simply leave the phone at my desk when I finished work. We don't have landlines at work either, all mobile.

I can understand the point, we have work laptops as well and though I'm one of the few that has nothing personal on it (I have more than enough laptops) so quite often leave it at work. But I wonder what the implications would be for us. One work colleague has a young boy, so she's often in at 11am but often still working at midnight at home, so I don't know how you would check it.

2484 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1140


  Reply # 774516 4-Mar-2013 19:28
Send private message

Yes, carrying two phones was a bit of a PITA. However:

- The accounting system was hell, and it was so much trouble reconciling and sorting that it was just better to avoid the whole mess by keeping personal use separate.

- The last employer was also security mad. For instance all texts through work phones were logged and stored centrally, forever. I didn't want, for instance, "certain" (cough) texts from the GF etc becoming a matter of perusal for bored people in IT.

- Some sites (Trademe for instance) were blocked on work computers and phones. Having a private smartphone to check them was useful.

2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 775692 6-Mar-2013 14:40
Send private message

networkn:
Klipspringer:
ubergeeknz:
Klipspringer:
floydbloke: Flexible hours, telecommuting/working from home and on the road are all here and here to stay.


Not if you working for Yahoo


And CEOs of companies which are actually successful are saying they're doing the complete wrong thing...


I don't know. Part of me agrees with Marissa Mayer.
From my experience, people working from home tend to slack off quiet conciderably. We use to allow it, but now we allow it on a case by case bases only.

Back to topic ...



This! We see so many employment issues as IT Providers, for workers who work from home. Complications all over the place. 


Best Buy Follows Yahoo in Banning Working from home

Best Buy, in the midst of a corporate restructuring, has canceled its flexible work program and expects corporate employees to put in traditional 40-hour work weeks at the retailer's headquarters in Richfield, Minn.



gzt

9834 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1472


  Reply # 775714 6-Mar-2013 15:16
Send private message

Best Buy has not banned working from home: "On an individual basis, an employee and a manager will have the opportunity to work out an arrangement that's in everyone's interests," Furman says. "But for the most part, the goal is to have employees in [the office] whenever possible."

Best Buy is going through a restructuring process. Yahoo is going through something similar.

12440 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5836

Trusted

  Reply # 775746 6-Mar-2013 16:01
Send private message

So following the logic BYOD's should bring a tax credit to the supplier




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.