Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


116 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 52


Topic # 115291 20-Mar-2013 15:43

While support the general idea of making sharehodlers liable, I do not agree that my deposit should be used to help out a faulty bank. Might as well use tax payers money...

Also TIL that there NZ is one of teh very few OECD countries that dont have a deposit insurance scheme. :/

Links:

http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/finstab/banking/4430900.html
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10872361
http://www.greens.org

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
1375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 579


  Reply # 784549 20-Mar-2013 15:51
Send private message

I'm torn on the subject - on one hand, why should my money go to prop up a bunch of fat-cat bankers.

On the other hand, putting money on a savings account is a form of investment, and like any other, has a risk. Investing in a bank savings account is a low interest, low risk investment, but low risk isn't no risk.

On the gripping hand, I have wayyyyy more debt in the shape of my mortgage than any form of savings, what are the odds of noone calling in my mortgage if the bank goes titsup?

3162 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 807


  Reply # 784560 20-Mar-2013 16:05
Send private message

Open Bank Resolution is a system that allows for a bank to remain open - by using a % of depositors funds as capital to enable the bank to continue to function,

It is designed to prevent the situation where a bank fails and closes its doors to everyone, the receivers take over and it takes months or years for customers to get they money( if they do get anything)

If you move to a "insurance" type system the banks just include the levy through lower interest payments for deposits or higher charges, + it leads to the situation of small institutions like finance companies go nuts with dodgy lending knowing that money will still flow through the door as customers will be saved by a government payout if it all goes bad..... have a look at South Canterbury Finance if you think Bank insurance promotes a stable financial system....

@Blueshift, If a large bank goes tits up in NZ, they are not going to call in your mortgage if you keep up the payments. A mass call in of mortgages would facilitate a huge glut of property on the market and a crash in prices, meaning the bank got even less money back..

The most likely situation is that the loan book would be sold on to another bank and things would continue as normal for the customer..

1375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 579


  Reply # 784577 20-Mar-2013 16:27
Send private message

wellygary:
@Blueshift, If a large bank goes tits up in NZ, they are not going to call in your mortgage if you keep up the payments. A mass call in of mortgages would facilitate a huge glut of property on the market and a crash in prices, meaning the bank got even less money back..

The most likely situation is that the loan book would be sold on to another bank and things would continue as normal for the customer..


Short answer - if (reasonably big if) bank goes titsup, my money invested with them is at risk, theirs lent to me isn't...

Awesome
4799 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1060

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 784583 20-Mar-2013 16:35
Send private message

BlueShift:Short answer - if (reasonably big if) bank goes titsup, my money invested with them is at risk, theirs lent to me isn't...


Receivers would sell that debt to another lender who would take it over from there. Proceeds from sale of debt would go towards any debts the failed bank had itself.




Twitter: ajobbins




116 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 52


  Reply # 784643 20-Mar-2013 18:20



If you move to a "insurance" type system the banks just include the levy through lower interest payments for deposits or higher charges, + it leads to the situation of small institutions like finance companies go nuts with dodgy lending knowing that money will still flow through the door as customers will be saved by a government payout if it all goes bad..... have a look at South Canterbury Finance if you think Bank insurance promotes a stable financial system....



The insurance works quite well in the rest of the world and besides the OPR is only for bigger banks anyway (locally incorporated banks with retail deposits over $1 billion).

I think it is a good idea as you never know what will happen to the economy with the Euro crisis still going on and the Aussie mining sector slowly going downhill.

14118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1795


  Reply # 784659 20-Mar-2013 18:46
Send private message

Having your money in the bank isn't really considered an investment as it basically makes enough interest to keep up with inflation. Some account s don't. If you invest money, you don't put it in the bank. It is used by many as just a safe place to keep their money. Otherwise people would be safer to keep their money in their own safe. Thus it should be covered by some form of guarantee scheme, as it should be zero risk. The problem is that banks are lending to people buying overpriced houses, with very small deposits, which is a bubble that will burst.
I think this latest move makes it far more likely there could be a run on the banks when another financial crisis hits, which may not be that far off, seeing what is happening in europe, as it is a bit like watching a slow car crash.
I believe that is one reason why the last bank guarantee was introduced back in 07-08. Pretty much everyone has a bank account, so I don't see any problem with the tax payer bailing out banks weith some form of deposit insurance scheme, as long as the banks aren't doing risky lending. The last one was successful, apart from the fact they also insured a few finance companies, which was a big mistake, as many people put their money in those when they had a guaranteed 7% return at no risk.
Also remember that NZ is one of the only countries in the OECD now that doesn't have some form of insurance. People have insurance on their houses, so why would keeping your money in the bank be any different. It is really not an incentive to save anything, and instead spend.

921 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 784682 20-Mar-2013 19:35
Send private message

Couldn't this system encourage the Australian banks to outsource their losses to their NZ subsidiaries in the event of a failure?

Wouldn't making depositors liable for banking failures encourage greater risk taking from the banks than if they had to pay insurance premiums where their profit margins would be skimmed by the best financial insurance analysts in the business who would recognise their risk profit better than members of the public?

244 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 105


  Reply # 784792 21-Mar-2013 08:08
Send private message

I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?

2995 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 453

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 784797 21-Mar-2013 08:23
One person supports this post
Send private message

DaveDog: I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?


My transaction account is not an "investment".  It returns ZERO interest to me.  Why should I be on the hook for the bank's investments?

453 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 784801 21-Mar-2013 08:28
Send private message

DaveDog: I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?


Completley agree with this. Any investment (especially one with a return) carries risk. Risk can often be defined by the amount of return. 

1375 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 579


  Reply # 784827 21-Mar-2013 10:16
Send private message

Byrned:
DaveDog: I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?


Completley agree with this. Any investment (especially one with a return) carries risk. Risk can often be defined by the amount of return. 


So an account with 0% interest, that you also pay account fees on should be negative risk?

244 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 105


  Reply # 784829 21-Mar-2013 10:21
Send private message

Kyanar:
DaveDog: I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?


My transaction account is not an "investment".  It returns ZERO interest to me.  Why should I be on the hook for the bank's investments?


Because as a depositor, you make a conscious decision to use that particular banks services - As soon as your money hits your account... Interest or not - You're an investor. It's your responsibility to check out their potential status and weigh up the risk...

244 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 105


  Reply # 784830 21-Mar-2013 10:22
Send private message

BlueShift:
Byrned:
DaveDog: I cannot fathom why anyone has a problem with this. You invest money and there is a risk. Simple as that. I'm a taxpayer - why should I carry the risk for someone else's investment?


Completley agree with this. Any investment (especially one with a return) carries risk. Risk can often be defined by the amount of return. 


So an account with 0% interest, that you also pay account fees on should be negative risk?


Not at all. The account may pay no interest - but you are receiving services in lieu of interest anyway.

1388 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 357


  Reply # 784896 21-Mar-2013 11:53
Send private message

What if you want to use banking services, but not be an investor?

I dont agree that banks should do this, believe it is barely legal stealing.

The way i see it, you probably shouldn't even be using a bank that is faulting. Put the money elsewhere.

I think that banks make (most of their) money doing too many 'odd' things (like derivatives investments) when most people only need the basic services.



116 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 52


  Reply # 784915 21-Mar-2013 12:32


Because as a depositor, you make a conscious decision to use that particular banks services - As soon as your money hits your account... Interest or not - You're an investor. It's your responsibility to check out their potential status and weigh up the risk...



A bank offers a service, they get my money to keep it save and can work with it till I want it back. Since they need cash to do other business (loans) they are not interested in me withdrawing my money. That is why they offer an incentive to me to keep it deposited for longer. You get a higher interest the longer you deposit it. This is not an investment. A normal teller can do this for me. If I do want to invest my money I have to talk to a different branch of that bank.

Besides, a normal customer of a bank does not have the ability to check a banks potential status. Most banking experts didnt even see the last financial crisis coming. How am I supposed to do this?

 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.