Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41
2443 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 145


  Reply # 801238 17-Apr-2013 22:43
Send private message

Welp passed! All done! Woot woot.

Wait, have any straight people marriages been destroyed yet? *crickets*

2443 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 145


  Reply # 801245 17-Apr-2013 22:47
Send private message

rossmnz: Says to me there was no real consensus?

Well its passed now so its all history.




77 to 44? Says there was plenty of consensus to me..
(See other bills national manages to pass as "mandates" hah)


18321 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 801246 17-Apr-2013 22:50
Send private message

rossmnz: Says to me there was no real consensus?

Well its passed now so its all history.




ugh.

2280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 370

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 801265 18-Apr-2013 01:11
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:
rossmnz: Says to me there was no real consensus?

Well its passed now so its all history.




ugh.


Was in context of the stuff.co.nz and Campbell live polls showing completely different results, 64% for vs 75% against.

I reckon it's about time there was the ability for public referendums to be performed online for such matters, as even though the bill passed with a 64% majority it may not have reflected what majority of the population on NZ actually wanted.




1332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152
Inactive user


  Reply # 801274 18-Apr-2013 06:38
Send private message

insane:
networkn:
rossmnz: Says to me there was no real consensus?

Well its passed now so its all history.




ugh.


Was in context of the stuff.co.nz and Campbell live polls showing completely different results, 64% for vs 75% against.

I reckon it's about time there was the ability for public referendums to be performed online for such matters, as even though the bill passed with a 64% majority it may not have reflected what majority of the population on NZ actually wanted.





This is a tough one because if we want a poll on every difficult issue we decide on then we'd never make a decision. This is what the politicians are there to do: represent our views. If they voted wrongly then they would end up out on the street come next election. We'll see if that happens and then know if the majority on NZ wanted this bill or not.

235 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 64


  Reply # 801295 18-Apr-2013 08:21
One person supports this post
Send private message

YAY, so many of my friends have now set dates for there weddings *slap* so much money spent on presents :(




I'm going to noob myself past judgement

507 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 31


  Reply # 801309 18-Apr-2013 08:46
Send private message

So we have had this foisted upon us as it is only fair that marriage be an option to all people who love each other.

Hmmm.

By that rationale then its only a matter of time before polygamous marriage is also recognised in NZ law?




 


The force is strong with this one!

3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 801325 18-Apr-2013 09:21
One person supports this post
Send private message

rossmnz: By that rationale then its only a matter of time before polygamous marriage is also recognised in NZ law?


And why shouldn't it be?

gzt

10190 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1562


  Reply # 801326 18-Apr-2013 09:21
Send private message

rossmnz: So we have had this foisted upon us as it is only fair that marriage be an option to all people who love each other.

Hmmm.

By that rationale then its only a matter of time before polygamous marriage is also recognised in NZ law?

Did you feel a strange compulsion to become gay and get married when this law was passed?

By that rationale everyone already became gay in 1988.

1198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152

Trusted

  Reply # 801327 18-Apr-2013 09:21
Send private message

rossmnz: So we have had this foisted upon us as it is only fair that marriage be an option to all people who love each other.

Hmmm.

By that rationale then its only a matter of time before polygamous marriage is also recognised in NZ law?


Well, get petitioning, start a website and get the ball rolling! Someone has to start the campaign!
Oh wait. You are just making stuff up. What about people marrying animals? It's only a matter of time!

Cheers,
Joseph

BDFL - Memuneh
61329 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12071

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 801400 18-Apr-2013 10:33
Send private message

New Zealand joins other twelve countries that allow same sex marriage: Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, parts of the United States, Uruguay , Mexico, and Brazil.




3034 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 466

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 801413 18-Apr-2013 10:43
2 people support this post
Send private message

freitasm: New Zealand joins other twelve countries that allow same sex marriage: Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, parts of the United States, Uruguay , Mexico, and Brazil.


Wait, you mean it's only allowed?  Based on all the handwaving from the anti-crowd, I thought it was going to be compulsory to immediately marry a same sex partner when the law was passed or something.

Almost like... they were complaining about something that doesn't affect them and is none of their business?  How truly odd.

18321 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 801434 18-Apr-2013 10:54
2 people support this post
Send private message

Kyanar:
freitasm: New Zealand joins other twelve countries that allow same sex marriage: Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, parts of the United States, Uruguay , Mexico, and Brazil.


Wait, you mean it's only allowed?  Based on all the handwaving from the anti-crowd, I thought it was going to be compulsory to immediately marry a same sex partner when the law was passed or something.

Almost like... they were complaining about something that doesn't affect them and is none of their business?  How truly odd.


I had hoped this sarcasm and other such nonsense might stop once the bill was passed. 

2861 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 801461 18-Apr-2013 11:17
Send private message

networkn:
Kyanar:
freitasm: New Zealand joins other twelve countries that allow same sex marriage: Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, parts of the United States, Uruguay , Mexico, and Brazil.


Wait, you mean it's only allowed?  Based on all the handwaving from the anti-crowd, I thought it was going to be compulsory to immediately marry a same sex partner when the law was passed or something.

Almost like... they were complaining about something that doesn't affect them and is none of their business?  How truly odd.


I had hoped this sarcasm and other such nonsense might stop once the bill was passed. 


I agree but the smugness of some will take a while to wear off and those that like taking free shots will revel in it all.




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




3034 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 466

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 801473 18-Apr-2013 11:27
Send private message

networkn:

I had hoped this sarcasm and other such nonsense might stop once the bill was passed. 


That's the last of it from me.

Ultimately, I still hold that I simply don't understand the point of the opposition.  It has precisely zero effect on the existing institution with the sole exception of making it more inclusive, and I personally hold inclusiveness to be a value worth pursuing (having been a bit of a social outlier myself through my younger years, though not for that reason).

The whole debate, to me, is silly.  I can't see why it was even an issue at all.  Their relationships were legal, why should they not be legally recognised as well?  Sure I've heard all the "for the children" arguments, but those fall flat in the face of evidence that single parents can raise children too.

1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.