Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
3282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 208

Trusted

  Reply # 789344 29-Mar-2013 18:50
Send private message

Geektastic:
bazzer: So what excuse will you use if it ever happened to you? I guess you needn't worry, it's just one of those unlucky things that happens. What do they call it, an accident, I think?


It simply won't happen to me.

I never drink ANY alcohol if I know I am driving.

I know, you said that. I meant, what will you blame when you can't blame the one beer you didn't have? And will you feel better or worse about yourself knowing you only have yourself to blame?

My point was accidents happen. If you had one beer, I don't really believe that would be the cause of the accident (given how quickly it's likely metabolised. I'm all for a zero tolerance, it sends the proper message, i.e. don't drink and drive, but how long do you have to wait after having a beer before you can drive again? 1 hours? 4 hours? 24 hours?

Edit: Oops! Looks like I missed a whole page of similar discussion!

3972 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789345 29-Mar-2013 18:50
Send private message

networkn: 1) Get a Taxi home (or any of the other services that get you and your car home).
2) Designate a Sober driver.

In case you consider using cost as a factor, if you can afford to drink, you can afford a taxi. If you can't afford both, don't do either!


Actually I very rarely drive short distances as I don't consider private cars to be cost effective for this purpose generally, so I would normally be taking a bus home anyway.

However, my point still stands. If, for some particular reason, I need to use the car to get home and there is absolutely no shadow of doubt that I am within a safe limit then I will drive. If I'm going to have a raucous night on the piss then obviously the car keys won't be in my pocket.

I'm not trying to be macho here and make out that accidents always happen to someone else. The road safety guidelines that I follow are consistent with how I expect everyone else to behave on the road.



17281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789362 29-Mar-2013 19:42
Send private message

bazzer:
Geektastic:
bazzer: So what excuse will you use if it ever happened to you? I guess you needn't worry, it's just one of those unlucky things that happens. What do they call it, an accident, I think?


It simply won't happen to me.

I never drink ANY alcohol if I know I am driving.

I know, you said that. I meant, what will you blame when you can't blame the one beer you didn't have? And will you feel better or worse about yourself knowing you only have yourself to blame?



LOL so let me get this straight. Your argument for allowing people to drink and drive is so they can blame the alcohol instead of themselves if they are in an accident? Wow. 



17281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789363 29-Mar-2013 19:44
Send private message

alasta:
networkn: 1) Get a Taxi home (or any of the other services that get you and your car home).
2) Designate a Sober driver.

In case you consider using cost as a factor, if you can afford to drink, you can afford a taxi. If you can't afford both, don't do either!


Actually I very rarely drive short distances as I don't consider private cars to be cost effective for this purpose generally, so I would normally be taking a bus home anyway.

However, my point still stands. If, for some particular reason, I need to use the car to get home and there is absolutely no shadow of doubt that I am within a safe limit then I will drive. If I'm going to have a raucous night on the piss then obviously the car keys won't be in my pocket.

I'm not trying to be macho here and make out that accidents always happen to someone else. The road safety guidelines that I follow are consistent with how I expect everyone else to behave on the road.


If you drink, it's impossible for their to be no doubt. You could be sick (and not know it), or any of 10 other factors that might affect how the alcohol you consumed might have changed your expected input.

I'm still asking for you to give me a good reason why driving after drinking is something you require to be able to do?

3972 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789367 29-Mar-2013 19:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn: If you drink, it's impossible for their to be no doubt. You could be sick (and not know it), or any of 10 other factors that might affect how the alcohol you consumed might have changed your expected input.


I disagree.

I'm still asking for you to give me a good reason why driving after drinking is something you require to be able to do?


There isn't one. There are thousands of enjoyable things in life that you don't 'need' to be able to do. If you only ever do the absolutely necessary then you must lead a very dull life.

3282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 208

Trusted

  Reply # 789369 29-Mar-2013 19:53
Send private message

networkn: LOL so let me get this straight. Your argument for allowing people to drink and drive is so they can blame the alcohol instead of themselves if they are in an accident? Wow. 

Huh? Not at all, and I don't know where you got that idea from.

Nice selective quoting BTW.



17281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789433 29-Mar-2013 21:34
Send private message

alasta:
networkn: If you drink, it's impossible for their to be no doubt. You could be sick (and not know it), or any of 10 other factors that might affect how the alcohol you consumed might have changed your expected input.


I disagree.

I'm still asking for you to give me a good reason why driving after drinking is something you require to be able to do?


There isn't one. There are thousands of enjoyable things in life that you don't 'need' to be able to do. If you only ever do the absolutely necessary then you must lead a very dull life.


Right, agreed, but is drinking AND driving required to have said fun? 

I'd certainly like to understand on what grounds you could disagree that it's not possible to be 100% certain you are not affected by the alcohol you drink in your driving?



17281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789437 29-Mar-2013 21:38
Send private message

bazzer:
networkn: LOL so let me get this straight. Your argument for allowing people to drink and drive is so they can blame the alcohol instead of themselves if they are in an accident? Wow. 

Huh? Not at all, and I don't know where you got that idea from.

Nice selective quoting BTW.


Not selective, I quoted your entire statement. I'd certainly like clarification on what you meant if it wasn't what I thought it meant.

3972 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789439 29-Mar-2013 21:43
Send private message

networkn: Right, agreed, but is drinking AND driving required to have said fun?


I addressed this above. I don't use a car to make short trips, but in principle I see no problem with driving a vehicle with well under 50mg of alcohol.

I'd certainly like to understand on what grounds you could disagree that it's not possible to be 100% certain you are not affected by the alcohol you drink in your driving?


Because the volume consumed is too small to make a difference to driver performance.



17281 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4940

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789441 29-Mar-2013 21:55
Send private message


I addressed this above. I don't use a car to make short trips, but in principle I see no problem with driving a vehicle with well under 50mg of alcohol.



No, that's being evasive, give me 1 reason why it's a requirement to be able to drink and drive? Explain to me 1 benefit other than cost of drinking and driving over any other alternative method of transport?



Because the volume consumed is too small to make a difference to driver performance.


Not in every single case for every single person so therefore, it's not 100%. 

5113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1065

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789445 29-Mar-2013 21:59
Send private message

jonb: I remember this story from the Herald last year:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10835869

I'm a bit of a lightweight drinker, but after 4 bottles of Heineken (1.3 standard units each) I would still be under the drink drive limit but I would be 'wasted'.  2 bottles and I still wouldn't feel safe to drive.



Same here...and I'm 120KG / 190cm. 

My own rule of thumb is one standard drink per hour....which is the amount of alcohol I can metabolise. 

If I skulled 4 beers...I don't drive for 4 hours.... If I drink one beer per hour....I'll drive an hour after the last one. 





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


3972 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789448 29-Mar-2013 22:19
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:

I addressed this above. I don't use a car to make short trips, but in principle I see no problem with driving a vehicle with well under 50mg of alcohol.
No, that's being evasive, give me 1 reason why it's a requirement to be able to drink and drive? Explain to me 1 benefit other than cost of drinking and driving over any other alternative method of transport?


Convenience, personal safety, availability.

By the way, the cost of two beers is effectively around $5 whereas the cost of a taxi from town to home is at least $20 (or up to $80 for a longer distance) so I don't buy the argument that 'if you can afford to drink then you can afford a taxi'. We're talking about minimal quantities of alcohol here for which the cost is bugger all. Noone is advocating that you can knock back $100 worth of piss and then take the wheel.


Because the volume consumed is too small to make a difference to driver performance.


Not in every single case for every single person so therefore, it's not 100%. 


Of course it's not safe to consume alcohol before driving in every conceivable scenario. However if the amount consumed is very small then the individual is perfectly capable of judging whether they are within an adequate safety margin given the prevailing circumstances.

11512 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3689

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789472 30-Mar-2013 00:35
Send private message

alasta:
networkn:

I addressed this above. I don't use a car to make short trips, but in principle I see no problem with driving a vehicle with well under 50mg of alcohol.
No, that's being evasive, give me 1 reason why it's a requirement to be able to drink and drive? Explain to me 1 benefit other than cost of drinking and driving over any other alternative method of transport?


Convenience, personal safety, availability.

By the way, the cost of two beers is effectively around $5 whereas the cost of a taxi from town to home is at least $20 (or up to $80 for a longer distance) so I don't buy the argument that 'if you can afford to drink then you can afford a taxi'. We're talking about minimal quantities of alcohol here for which the cost is bugger all. Noone is advocating that you can knock back $100 worth of piss and then take the wheel.


Because the volume consumed is too small to make a difference to driver performance.


Not in every single case for every single person so therefore, it's not 100%. 


Of course it's not safe to consume alcohol before driving in every conceivable scenario. However if the amount consumed is very small then the individual is perfectly capable of judging whether they are within an adequate safety margin given the prevailing circumstances.


If these individuals were indeed capable of judging whether they are within an adequate safety margin, presumably they would do that now and we would never have anyone stopped for DUI?

Sorry but most of the gimps you see on Police 10-7 being hauled over look as though they have escaped from either prison or a gypsy camp and can barely string a coherent sentence together. I wouldn't trust them with a decision as important as whether they are fit to drive having been in the pub.





Mad Scientist
18624 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2367

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 789473 30-Mar-2013 00:48
Send private message

Certain blood concentration of Alcohol and certain amount of fatigue impair drivers to the same exact extent ... A maths test for fatigue needed?

Alcohol impairs ... But so do other stuff ... Fatigue, peers (teens way more likely to crash if other teens on board), kids, arguing couple, hot pies, rain, thinking about business, etc ... But no, just put the alcohol limit to zero and the world is cured ....

11512 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3689

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 789474 30-Mar-2013 00:49
Send private message

Scotland, Germany, France and Spain all have 50 mcg limits.

That means that one pint could put some people over the limit. That seems a workable solution to me.

They also deal with them somewhat more harshly than our wet lettuce judges seem to here.

Under current laws, which apply to the whole of Britain, drink-drivers face a maximum sentence of six months in prison, a fine of up to £5,000 and a 12-month ban.

That seems fair enough. The main problem we have is that there are still too many who think their right to drink and drive trumps anyone else's right not to be killed or injured by them. Sure, there are many factors that can contribute to a car accident but since alcohol is a definite factor and could easily be excluded it seems dumb not to.





1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.