Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
SaltyNZ
5481 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813505 8-May-2013 09:29
Send private message

noc: This whole thread has reminded me why I have Full Insurance on my car. You pay more, but in return, you don't have to deal with people like the OP...... tisk tisk


Well, unfortunately you still do if you don't want to lose your excess and no claims bonus. But at least you can go ahead and get your car fixed in the meantime.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Skolink
1081 posts

Uber Geek


  #813538 8-May-2013 10:12
Send private message

Just be glad the other party only has 3rd party insurance, otherwise they probably would already have got the repairs for $800, and now you (or your insurance company) would have to pay.
This happened to us. My wife backed into a car at an intersection. The only damage was tearing of the plastic bumper (unpainted) where it held the liscence plate on.
I asked them to tell me how much it would be, and then phoned them to remind them again.
When they finally got back to me it they had already had the car repaired, and presented with a bill from their insurance company! The bill had items on it that were very dubious eg 'straightening airconditioning radiator', but what could I do, there was no way to get alternative quotes once it had already been 'repaired'.
So my advice is to satisfy yourself that the 'tiny scratch' can't be repaired easily for the cost of a touchup paint vial and a replacement light from a wreckers. I recently bought both to repair a car before I sold it.

 
 
 
 


DaveDog
317 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #813583 8-May-2013 11:22
Send private message

Bee: I saw a hole in the system/law and I'm thinking about taking it - I was wanting someone to confirm or deny that this hole exists... I don't have a definitive answer but 90% sure this hole does exist...

KiwiNZ, I don't think I'm a bad person - If I had $5M I would gladly be generous and give you some if you asked but as I don't always have enough money to put food on the table for my family at the moment, I'm not going to pay for something unless I HAVE to... I think that's pretty reasonable???


It isn't reasonable at all - just because you can't afford to pay to repair the damage that you have caused doesn't mean the other person should pay for the damage that you have caused... They could well be in a worse financial situation that you are - and it comes across here that you don't really care about that...

tripp
3561 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813620 8-May-2013 12:16
Send private message

I guess that is the problem with NZ these day's
Pricing going up for everything, wage still low and no one really has the "back up" money they need and just find it easier to tick things up (big TV's computers etc).

I myself have a lot of insurance (even for the cat) so i am not stuck with big repair bills if things happen, I also have a bit of money saved however I keep a credit card at a 0 balance for "Oh c**p moments" and I have no money in savings.  Sure using the credit card = another debt however I can always make payments on the credit card each month and not hit with 1 big payment.



graemeh
2078 posts

Uber Geek


  #813637 8-May-2013 12:41
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
noc: This whole thread has reminded me why I have Full Insurance on my car. You pay more, but in return, you don't have to deal with people like the OP...... tisk tisk


Well, unfortunately you still do if you don't want to lose your excess and no claims bonus. But at least you can go ahead and get your car fixed in the meantime.


Most insurance policies don't charge an excess where the other driver is at fault and has been identified.

Some insurance policies also "protect" the no claims bonus so you don't automatically lose it.

SaltyNZ
5481 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813664 8-May-2013 13:24
Send private message

graemeh: 

Most insurance policies don't charge an excess where the other driver is at fault and has been identified.

Some insurance policies also "protect" the no claims bonus so you don't automatically lose it.


They do when the other driver says 'No, I am not at fault, and I won't pay.' Then you still have to take them to the Disputes Tribunal. I've done it twice, with two different insurance companies.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


bagheera
399 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #813676 8-May-2013 13:48
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
graemeh: 

Most insurance policies don't charge an excess where the other driver is at fault and has been identified.

Some insurance policies also "protect" the no claims bonus so you don't automatically lose it.


They do when the other driver says 'No, I am not at fault, and I won't pay.' Then you still have to take them to the Disputes Tribunal. I've done it twice, with two different insurance companies.


when i had a tuck hit me from behind and he said it was my fault, AMI said no it was not, fix my car, no excess or no claim bonus lost, no court either, was very surprised.

 
 
 
 


SaltyNZ
5481 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813677 8-May-2013 13:52
Send private message

bagheera:
SaltyNZ:
graemeh: 

Most insurance policies don't charge an excess where the other driver is at fault and has been identified.

Some insurance policies also "protect" the no claims bonus so you don't automatically lose it.


They do when the other driver says 'No, I am not at fault, and I won't pay.' Then you still have to take them to the Disputes Tribunal. I've done it twice, with two different insurance companies.


when i had a tuck hit me from behind and he said it was my fault, AMI said no it was not, fix my car, no excess or no claim bonus lost, no court either, was very surprised.


Did the other driver have AMI insurance too?




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


throbb
638 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #813679 8-May-2013 13:58
Send private message

bagheera:
SaltyNZ:
graemeh: 

Most insurance policies don't charge an excess where the other driver is at fault and has been identified.

Some insurance policies also "protect" the no claims bonus so you don't automatically lose it.


They do when the other driver says 'No, I am not at fault, and I won't pay.' Then you still have to take them to the Disputes Tribunal. I've done it twice, with two different insurance companies.


when i had a tuck hit me from behind and he said it was my fault, AMI said no it was not, fix my car, no excess or no claim bonus lost, no court either, was very surprised.


Same thing happened with me with Sate. The dude that hit my car said it was my fault. I told state what happened and drew a diagram for them, they fixed my car with no excess.

Bung
3511 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #813680 8-May-2013 13:59
Send private message

Possibly wouldn't matter, apparently most companies have an agreement not to pursue costs between themselves. The "nock for nock" principle. If it's just joe bloggs then the gloves come off.

SaltyNZ
5481 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813683 8-May-2013 14:01
Send private message

Bung: Possibly wouldn't matter, apparently most companies have an agreement not to pursue costs between themselves. The "nock for nock" principle. If it's just joe bloggs then the gloves come off.


Some, I think, yeah, but both Vero and NZI have told us we were paying excess etc. unless we took the other person to court, after being reversed into.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Bung
3511 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #813687 8-May-2013 14:08
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
Bung: Possibly wouldn't matter, apparently most companies have an agreement not to pursue costs between themselves. The "nock for nock" principle. If it's just joe bloggs then the gloves come off.


Some, I think, yeah, but both Vero and NZI have told us we were paying excess etc. unless we took the other person to court, after being reversed into.


That would probably be because the other person wasn't insured or like the OP wouldn't put in a claim.

tdgeek
21537 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813693 8-May-2013 14:16
Send private message

Bung: Possibly wouldn't matter, apparently most companies have an agreement not to pursue costs between themselves. The "nock for nock" principle. If it's just joe bloggs then the gloves come off.


I believe that the full repair costs will fall on the insurance company of the party at fault, that company will then recover the excess from their customer.

Bung
3511 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #813706 8-May-2013 14:36
Send private message

This corresponds with how it was explained to me.

"KNOCK FOR KNOCK
A forbearance agreement between two insurance companies designed to avoid legal action. This arrangement applies to motor vehicle policies and under it each company agrees to pay up to the limits of their respective interests for the damage to the vehicle of their own insured without regard as to who was to blame for the accident. "

SaltyNZ
5481 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #813714 8-May-2013 14:56
Send private message

Bung:
SaltyNZ:
Bung: Possibly wouldn't matter, apparently most companies have an agreement not to pursue costs between themselves. The "nock for nock" principle. If it's just joe bloggs then the gloves come off.


Some, I think, yeah, but both Vero and NZI have told us we were paying excess etc. unless we took the other person to court, after being reversed into.


That would probably be because the other person wasn't insured or like the OP wouldn't put in a claim.


They were insured, they just didn't want to pay their excess.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Vodafone enables 5G roaming - for when international travel comes
Posted 30-Oct-2020 15:03


Spark awards funding to Kiwi businesses in 5G funding initiative
Posted 30-Oct-2020 14:58


Huawei launches IdeaHub Pro in New Zealand
Posted 27-Oct-2020 16:41


Southland-based IT specialist providing virtual services worldwide
Posted 27-Oct-2020 15:55


NASA discovers water on sunlit surface of Moon
Posted 27-Oct-2020 08:30


Huawei introduces new features to Petal Search, Maps and Docs
Posted 26-Oct-2020 18:05


Nokia selected by NASA to build first ever cellular network on the Moon
Posted 21-Oct-2020 08:34


Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS16211+
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.