Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858097 17-Jul-2013 15:32
Send private message

6FIEND:
KiwiNZ: As for administration, if you have spent many years administering welfare then I may listen to you.


So - unless someone is an expert in the "old way" of doing something, they cannot possibly have anything helpful or insightful to say about a new process?

At least I can now filter your commentary in the context of a known level of closed-mindedness...


Administering welfare is simply not just spreadsheeting, there are many variables and people involved.  




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858099 17-Jul-2013 15:34
Send private message

Inphinity:
KiwiNZ:
If he/they meet the Statutory requirements of Section 89 of the SSA then they will and should be granted Income Support.


See, this is one of the bits I disagree with. To me, "I quit my above-average-paying job without having organised any other source of income" shouldn't qualify, but it does, when I feel it should be better targetted but more effective, though specifically how to do that is obviously a big debate.


From a Media article it is not possible to know all the circumstances so making a judgement on that is wrong. That is why I wrote that "If he/they meet the Statutory requirements of Section 89 of the SSA then they will and should be granted Income Support" this of course will be determined by their case manager 
not a reporter.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


 
 
 
 


2541 posts

Uber Geek


  # 858102 17-Jul-2013 15:54
Send private message

KiwiNZ: 

From a Media article it is not possible to know all the circumstances so making a judgement on that is wrong. That is why I wrote that "If he/they meet the Statutory requirements of Section 89 of the SSA then they will and should be granted Income Support" this of course will be determined by their case manager 
not a reporter.


I agree, media are not reliable. My point stands, though, that (regardless of the actual facts of this particular instance) the circumstance of having quit a reasonably well paying job with no plan for what to do next should not, in my opinion, qualify one for welfare assistance. I suspect at the very least there is (or should be) a stand-down period involved, which I believe is even the case for redundancy (or used to be, certainly). Anyway, if that is not what happened in this instance, then of course the outcome may well be justified. I wasn't specifically saying that Sinclair should not be eligible, just that people choosing to leave paid work of their own free will should at very least have far tougher criteria to meet to receive welfare than those who are trying unsuccessfully to find work.

14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858107 17-Jul-2013 16:00
Send private message

Inphinity:
KiwiNZ: 

From a Media article it is not possible to know all the circumstances so making a judgement on that is wrong. That is why I wrote that "If he/they meet the Statutory requirements of Section 89 of the SSA then they will and should be granted Income Support" this of course will be determined by their case manager 
not a reporter.


I agree, media are not reliable. My point stands, though, that (regardless of the actual facts of this particular instance) the circumstance of having quit a reasonably well paying job with no plan for what to do next should not, in my opinion, qualify one for welfare assistance. I suspect at the very least there is (or should be) a stand-down period involved, which I believe is even the case for redundancy (or used to be, certainly). Anyway, if that is not what happened in this instance, then of course the outcome may well be justified. I wasn't specifically saying that Sinclair should not be eligible, just that people choosing to leave paid work of their own free will should at very least have far tougher criteria to meet to receive welfare than those who are trying unsuccessfully to find work.


Again if the Statutory requirements are met a grant of benefit will be made, there are provision under the legislation to impose voluntary unemployment stand downs, if the circumstances warrant that then a stand down will and should be imposed. 




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


1304 posts

Uber Geek


  # 858117 17-Jul-2013 16:12
Send private message

KiwiNZ: 
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".


In many cases, it's not. A friend of mine was made redundant and, at age 55, cannot find other work. He was the sole breadwinner of the family and has a mortgage. The basic benefit covers their food but not insurance, rates or mortgage costs. The allowance for housing costs is $15 a week. He is not able to claim additional help from WINZ and I've watched as they have been selling off pretty much everything they can dispose of just in order to live. Their house is on the market now. So, in three years thats one family that went from being secure to losing everything. 

One can argue that people who own houses should sell them if they lose employment. I would argue that if benefits are really a hand up, and supposed to help people out of temporary holes then they shouldn't end up losing everything. I know that both this guy and his wife go into WINZ every week religiously to see if any work is available. At one stage she was stacking shelves in a supermarket starting at midnight each night but that didn't help them as the money she earned was deducted from the benefit. 

The problem with a set scheme for benefits is that its dealing with individuals who each have individual needs. Some people can manage, others can't and as long as there is a one-size-fits-all scheme there will be people who aren't getting what they need. 

14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858120 17-Jul-2013 16:14
Send private message

Elpie:
KiwiNZ: 
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".


In many cases, it's not. A friend of mine was made redundant and, at age 55, cannot find other work. He was the sole breadwinner of the family and has a mortgage. The basic benefit covers their food but not insurance, rates or mortgage costs. The allowance for housing costs is $15 a week. He is not able to claim additional help from WINZ and I've watched as they have been selling off pretty much everything they can dispose of just in order to live. Their house is on the market now. So, in three years thats one family that went from being secure to losing everything. 

One can argue that people who own houses should sell them if they lose employment. I would argue that if benefits are really a hand up, and supposed to help people out of temporary holes then they shouldn't end up losing everything. I know that both this guy and his wife go into WINZ every week religiously to see if any work is available. At one stage she was stacking shelves in a supermarket starting at midnight each night but that didn't help them as the money she earned was deducted from the benefit. 

The problem with a set scheme for benefits is that its dealing with individuals who each have individual needs. Some people can manage, others can't and as long as there is a one-size-fits-all scheme there will be people who aren't getting what they need. 


Elpie . Please look at your private messages




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


gzt

10912 posts

Uber Geek


  # 858262 17-Jul-2013 19:07
Send private message

There is a lot of hot air here, and little discussion of the actual changes. What are they anyway? I only know one, cutting a benefit/assistance for anyone with an arrest warrant, and they say 8000 people will be affected by that. My guess is a substantial number will not even know they are subject to a warrant until this occurs. Most of it will be traffic type stuff imho. 8000 in one day would be kind of crazy. If you add children that could be higher. Either way I'm not convinced of the wisdom really.

 
 
 
 


2868 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 858272 17-Jul-2013 19:26
Send private message

gzt: There is a lot of hot air here, and little discussion of the actual changes. What are they anyway? I only know one, cutting a benefit/assistance for anyone with an arrest warrant, and they say 8000 people will be affected by that. My guess is a substantial number will not even know they are subject to a warrant until this occurs. Most of it will be traffic type stuff imho. 8000 in one day would be kind of crazy. If you add children that could be higher. Either way I'm not convinced of the wisdom really.


well if they don't know they soon will when the bene is cut, maybe a large majority are aware of the warrants as well, not all are as innocent as some would like to make out. So what if its traffice or minor offences unless they are innocent how is it an issue.




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




4941 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 858273 17-Jul-2013 19:27
Send private message

@gzt

I'd assume that WINZ would send the person a letter stating that their benefit is at risk because of an outstanding arrest warrent. Of course, it's up to the beneficery to ensure that WINZ has their current address.

A previous partner of mine's mother was on a benefit and went overseas without telling WINZ. She got a letter from them asking for an explanation, as she was required to inform WINZ if she went overseas, among other conditions.




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?


1828 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  # 858325 17-Jul-2013 21:27
Send private message

So with the money "supposedly" being saved from cutting people benefits are they going to employ more police to cover the increase in crime??? probably not

KiwiNZ:
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".

really so your saying you'd have no problem living on $206 (basic benefit payment) a week which you'll need to cover rent, food, phone, power, insurance, travel cost, oh and heaven forbid you get ill and have to go see a doctor you'll have to rob Peter to pay Paul GOOD LUCK with that

2800 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 858354 17-Jul-2013 21:48
Send private message

Athlonite: So with the money "supposedly" being saved from cutting people benefits are they going to employ more police to cover the increase in crime??? probably not

KiwiNZ:
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".

really so your saying you'd have no problem living on $206 (basic benefit payment) a week which you'll need to cover rent, food, phone, power, insurance, travel cost, oh and heaven forbid you get ill and have to go see a doctor you'll have to rob Peter to pay Paul GOOD LUCK with that


I'm pretty sure people on the benefit don't pay for insurance and where are they travelling to that costs money? 




Solution Architect @Intergen
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.


14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858356 17-Jul-2013 21:52
Send private message

lokhor:
Athlonite: So with the money "supposedly" being saved from cutting people benefits are they going to employ more police to cover the increase in crime??? probably not

KiwiNZ:
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".

really so your saying you'd have no problem living on $206 (basic benefit payment) a week which you'll need to cover rent, food, phone, power, insurance, travel cost, oh and heaven forbid you get ill and have to go see a doctor you'll have to rob Peter to pay Paul GOOD LUCK with that


I'm pretty sure people on the benefit don't pay for insurance and where are they travelling to that costs money? 


Travel? Try job interviews, shopping, Doctors, life.......


Oh and yes they do have insurance




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


2800 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 858359 17-Jul-2013 22:01
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
lokhor:
Athlonite: So with the money "supposedly" being saved from cutting people benefits are they going to employ more police to cover the increase in crime??? probably not

KiwiNZ:
The level of benefits now compared to average incomes is "liveable".

really so your saying you'd have no problem living on $206 (basic benefit payment) a week which you'll need to cover rent, food, phone, power, insurance, travel cost, oh and heaven forbid you get ill and have to go see a doctor you'll have to rob Peter to pay Paul GOOD LUCK with that


I'm pretty sure people on the benefit don't pay for insurance and where are they travelling to that costs money? 


Travel? Try job interviews, shopping, Doctors, life.......


Oh and yes they do have insurance


What about all the money they make from selling pot?




Solution Architect @Intergen
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.


2800 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 858361 17-Jul-2013 22:03
Send private message

On a more serious note, $206 isn't really enough for anyone to survive. Solo mothers on the DPB get ~$500 a week with one infant




Solution Architect @Intergen
All comments are my own opinion, and not that of my employer unless explicitly stated.


14254 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 858366 17-Jul-2013 22:13
Send private message


lokhor: On a more serious note, $206 isn't really enough for anyone to survive. Solo mothers on the DPB get ~$500 a week with one infant


$206 is for  single 25 year old without supplementary support. No dependants. A sole parent, 1 child getting $500 plus per week would have to have high outgoings qualifying for considerable extra support




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Arlo unveils its first video doorbell
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:27


New Zealand students shortlisted for James Dyson Award
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:18


Norton LifeLock Launches Norton 360
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:11


Microsoft New Zealand Partner Awards results
Posted 18-Oct-2019 10:18


Logitech introduces new Made for Google keyboard and mouse devices
Posted 16-Oct-2019 13:36


MATTR launches to accelerate decentralised identity
Posted 16-Oct-2019 10:28


Vodafone X-Squad powers up for customers
Posted 16-Oct-2019 08:15


D Link ANZ launches EXO Smart Mesh Wi Fi Routers with McAfee protection
Posted 15-Oct-2019 11:31


Major Japanese retailer partners with smart New Zealand technology IMAGR
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:29


Ola pioneers one-time passcode feature to fight rideshare fraud
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:24


Spark Sport new home of NZC matches from 2020
Posted 10-Oct-2019 09:59


Meet Nola, Noel Leeming's new digital employee
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:07


Registrations for Sprout Accelerator open for 2020 season
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:02


Teletrac Navman welcomes AI tech leader Jens Meggers as new President
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:41


Vodafone makes voice of 4G (VoLTE) official
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:36



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.