Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 19
2170 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 358


  Reply # 865036 24-Jul-2013 13:45
Send private message

I thought porn built the interwebz and e-commerce?!

Porn swayed the BD vs. HD-DVD war to conclusion too didn't it?!

1359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 344


  Reply # 865037 24-Jul-2013 13:45
Send private message

Talkiet:

Careful Mark, what you're describing there is active and responsible parenting. If that was to catch on there'd be significantly less for people to get upset about.



Cr@p!  I'll try to be less caring in future .. maybe leave matches and sharp knives laying around while I go out to Sky City  ;-)

14268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1847


  Reply # 865039 24-Jul-2013 13:52
Send private message

Maybe they could make it an option when someone signs up to a new connection with an ISP. But then what makes an adult website, a porn website. Do online stores that sell adult toys fit into this category. Don't some trading websites also fit into that category. Personally I am not a fan of net censorship. One reason is because it is not foolproof anyway. Some websites will get incorrectly categorised as one, and it may be very difficult to get off the list. Likewise other ones will slip through.

4011 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 523

Trusted

  Reply # 865044 24-Jul-2013 13:53
Send private message

Wade: I thought porn built the interwebz and e-commerce?!

Porn swayed the BD vs. HD-DVD war to conclusion too didn't it?!


I think it helped in the VHS vs Betamax




Previously known as psycik

NextPVR: 
Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix --> Samsung LA46A650D via HDMI, NextPVR,
OpenHAB: ODroid C2 eMMC DriveOpenHAB with Aeotech ZWave Controller, Raspberry PI, Wemos D1 Mini, Zwave and Bluetooth LE Sensors
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4, Roku3, HDHomeRun Dual
Windows 2012 
Host (Plex Server/Crashplan): 2x2TB, 2x3TB, 1x4TB using DriveBender, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Hyper-V Server with 1xW10, 1xW2k8, 2xUbuntu 16.04 LTS, Crashplan, NextPVR channel for Plex,NextPVR Metadata Agent and Scanner for Plex


6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 865045 24-Jul-2013 13:57
Send private message

worst idea ever.

On the other hand, I did see this which I thought was a pretty cool way for an ISP to implement it.

http://revk.www.me.uk/2013/07/active-choice.html


3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 865049 24-Jul-2013 14:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

BTR: I think it passes the parents responsibility onto the ISP. It also in a way restricts peoples freedom and privacy.


Lets say Joe Bloggs likes to look at adult websites therefore if he wants to do so under the what the OP article is proposing he has to ring up his ISP which he might be embarrassed about even though its perfectly legal just immoral to some, he then also has the risk of what happens if the call taker at the ISP recognises him which would add further embarrassment.

The internet in all its greatness allows people to feel they have a certain level of privacy and anonymity to go about their private life.

Just my 2cents.


Aside from the slippery slope of government censorship, that's the big problem I have with this.  If someone wants continued access, they are now going on record as saying "yes, I want to be able to look at internet porn".  Who is that information going to be shared with?  Is that going to be used against you?  Are they going to start monitoring what *kind* of porn people look at?

I've no problem with banning violent or illegal (child especially) porn.  But to make people "opt in" to access any porn at all, it just seems like the wrong thing.

1006 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 29


  Reply # 865052 24-Jul-2013 14:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

Utterly rubbish idea that is very easily circumvented and very difficult to enact in the first place. As others have said try proper parenting instead of just banning everything. Some teenagers are going to watch porn and others aren't. You can't stop the ones that are lol, trust me :)

3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 865055 24-Jul-2013 14:17
Send private message

Asmodeus: Utterly rubbish idea that is very easily circumvented and very difficult to enact in the first place. As others have said try proper parenting instead of just banning everything. Some teenagers are going to watch porn and others aren't. You can't stop the ones that are lol, trust me :)


Also this.  It's been proven time and again that banning desirable goods and/or services does not actually prevent access.  I bet theft of porno mags will go back up to pre internet levels!

BDFL - Memuneh
61162 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11942

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 865056 24-Jul-2013 14:17
2 people support this post
Send private message

Fixed your post for you... It's "pornography" not "phornography".

for a moment there I thought it was even funny. Easier to call it "porn".




2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 865070 24-Jul-2013 14:25
Send private message

ubergeeknz:

I've no problem with banning violent or illegal (child especially) porn.  But to make people "opt in" to access any porn at all, it just seems like the wrong thing.


But I have been automatically "opted in" without actually wanting any of it.

If it gets blocked at ISP level I can protect myself from illegal content. Ie. accidentally stumbling across some child porn online.

I have no problem with goverment enfocing the laws of NZ onto ISP's. If you not happy then blame the laws.

If you choose to break the law why do people just expect ISP's to just allow them to do so? (using their infrastructure and service).

Edit: My view would have been so different if I was 10years younger :-)


3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 865075 24-Jul-2013 14:30
Send private message

Klipspringer:
ubergeeknz:

I've no problem with banning violent or illegal (child especially) porn.  But to make people "opt in" to access any porn at all, it just seems like the wrong thing.


But I have been automatically "opted in" without actually wanting any of it.

If it gets blocked at ISP level I can protect myself from illegal content. Ie. accidentally stumbling across some child porn online.

I have no problem with goverment enfocing the laws of NZ onto ISP's. If you not happy then blame the laws.

If you choose to break the law why do people just expect ISP's to just allow them to do so? (using their infrastructure and service).

Edit: My view would have been so different if I was 10years younger :-)



This thread is not talking about the NZ Child Porn filter.  It is talking about the proposed UK "all porn" filter (with opt-out) and would it be a good idea in NZ as well.

2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 865078 24-Jul-2013 14:33
Send private message

ubergeeknz:
Klipspringer:
ubergeeknz:

I've no problem with banning violent or illegal (child especially) porn.  But to make people "opt in" to access any porn at all, it just seems like the wrong thing.


But I have been automatically "opted in" without actually wanting any of it.

If it gets blocked at ISP level I can protect myself from illegal content. Ie. accidentally stumbling across some child porn online.

I have no problem with goverment enfocing the laws of NZ onto ISP's. If you not happy then blame the laws.

If you choose to break the law why do people just expect ISP's to just allow them to do so? (using their infrastructure and service).

Edit: My view would have been so different if I was 10years younger :-)



This thread is not talking about the NZ Child Porn filter.  It is talking about the proposed UK "all porn" filter (with opt-out) and would it be a good idea in NZ as well.


Thats why I said I have been automatically "opted in" without actually wanting any of it.

So yes it would be a good idea.

2518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 937

Subscriber

  Reply # 865079 24-Jul-2013 14:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

Klipspringer: I have no problem with goverment enfocing the laws of NZ onto ISP's. If you not happy then blame the laws.

If you choose to break the law why do people just expect ISP's to just allow them to do so? (using their infrastructure and service).



Pornographic content in and of itself is not illegal. Implementing this sort of filter would be enforcing the moral views of a section of the community, not a law. Very different.




Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

2385 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 286
Inactive user


  Reply # 865080 24-Jul-2013 14:35
Send private message

Inphinity:
Klipspringer: I have no problem with goverment enfocing the laws of NZ onto ISP's. If you not happy then blame the laws.

If you choose to break the law why do people just expect ISP's to just allow them to do so? (using their infrastructure and service).



Pornographic content in and of itself is not illegal. Implementing this sort of filter would be enforcing the moral views of a section of the community, not a law. Very different.


I was talking about child pornography which is illegal.

3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Trusted
Vocus

  Reply # 865083 24-Jul-2013 14:38
Send private message

I don't think there's any argument against child porn being illegal.  I think it's fair to say that it's pretty easy to define what is, and what isn't, child pornography.

The proposal in the UK is to restrict everyone's internet access to all kinds of pornography, illegal or not.  To access any kind of pornography (or whatever the state deems to be pornography), people would have to "opt in".  That's what we're talking about here.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 19
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.