Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 1024205 12-Apr-2014 22:29
Send private message

Its interesting that the complainant didnt moan about cellular coverage....
I used to live a few minutes away from Permin Road and for best internet speed I used a 3G device....speeds varied but generally 3-5 down and 600k+ up.
Ok so My cap was 6gigs a month but it was a reliable service even though path length was long and not a clear line of sight.

At his address he'd probably have closer options now as new towers and services have gone into the general area.....Just saying

3980 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2686

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1024221 13-Apr-2014 00:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

Let's take this to the logical fullest extent. Let's say there's one guy living 200km away from the nearest fibre or existing network, in the shadow of a tall mountain, perhaps in Fiordland or something. He invested in a nice solar system and has a generator but now wants Internet.

Should he 

A) build a solar powered repeater close to home that can see a satellite and wifi the signal back to his house and stump up for a satellite plan 

or

B) Whinge that because he's a taxpayer, someone should spend the several million dollars needed to give him is $100/month ADSL plan.

Now, let's imagine it's a settlement of 25 people but the same costs? Does it change the logical answer? No.

Now, what if instead of several million bucks, it might cost only a few hundred thousand...

At some point the equation works, we all just need to accept that there are going to be cases where no private company or government funding should be wasted to connect a small number of people in way out locations, and there are going to be situations where the decision won't be clear cut but is probably still an inefficient use of either business capital or taxpayer funds.

It's not rocket science, and it does cast serious aspersions on the skill and knowledge of various professional organisations within NZ that continue to bang the drum.

Cheers - N

Oh... "Way Out Locations" don't have to be that far away to be expensive either. Sometimes just a few K can be VERY costly to cover depending on equipment needed, local geography, bridges, accessibility, etc.


 
 
 
 


4700 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2646

Trusted

  Reply # 1024256 13-Apr-2014 07:54
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
TimA:

OK, Good to see it spent on upgrading backhauls and enabling ADSL2+ and VDSL2 on rural exchanges. Bumma the internet gods dont favor that township of 25 people.


But that's exactly my point. Chorus is a business, Vodafone is a business ... 2degrees is a business. Businesses for profit. If it was left up to for-profit businesses then 30% of the population, who are unprofitable, wouldn't have basic services at all. That's why it should be provided by the taxpayer. Taxes are there precisely to ensure that everyone has access to everything they require. In the 21st century, that includes broadband.


Everything they require? The government has to allocate resources as it sees best (not saying they always do it right, or how me or anyone else would prefer), but we elect our governments to do this work on our behalf. There will never be enough money to give everyone everything that they require. Some compromises always have to be made.

Otherwise we could just go back to how it was under Muldoon: borrowing lots of money from overseas to pay for a lifestyle that we couldn't pay for out of our own pockets.




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?




Mr Snotty
8434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4358

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1024312 13-Apr-2014 11:51
Send private message

I think the problem also is if they complain to the point they get what they want it could cost Chorus thousands, those 25 people are possibly on different cabinets too. The news will suck up "Local community gets faster broadband" and more people will complain.

My parents are on a very overloaded ASAM in Foxhill, Nelson so I know what it is like. Instead of complaining about their internet speeds I've allocated dedicated bandwidth to their SIP phone and when their internet literally drops down to dialup speed on their laptop it means there is 160kbit total bandwidth available to their connection, they go outside to feed the horses and do general work on their farm or watch a movie on the couch with the fire going, doesn't even bother them. They've got the best lifestyle out and not having internet for a hour per day is not going to ruin all the awesome things they have.

During off-peak they're able to get 7mbit, able to build up that movie collection for the next time they want to just relax from their lifestyle.




3980 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2686

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1024315 13-Apr-2014 11:54
Send private message

michaelmurfy:[snip]Instead of complaining about their internet speeds I've allocated dedicated bandwidth to their SIP phone and when their internet literally drops down to dialup speed on their laptop it means there is 160kbit total bandwidth available to their connection, [snip].


Heh... I admire the solution, and it's a good one...

But look up 'kbit', 'literally' and 'dialup speed' please :-)

Cheers - N




Mr Snotty
8434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4358

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1024317 13-Apr-2014 12:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

Talkiet:
michaelmurfy:[snip]Instead of complaining about their internet speeds I've allocated dedicated bandwidth to their SIP phone and when their internet literally drops down to dialup speed on their laptop it means there is 160kbit total bandwidth available to their connection, [snip].


Heh... I admire the solution, and it's a good one...

But look up 'kbit', 'literally' and 'dialup speed' please :-)

Cheers - N



Well since I allocate 100Kbps (/8 = 12.5KBps) to their phone so that stays going their connection to their laptop / other devices is lower than 60Kbit, so "literally" dialup speed is allowed to be said here ;)




4831 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2315

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1024331 13-Apr-2014 12:42
Send private message

TimA:
sbiddle: 
Wireless is a finite resource that always need to be priced at a premium over fixed line services.



Not just a premium but need to be maintained to the certain level to ensure quality over quantity. Otherwise its just a wireless Conklin.


The fact that people are using more internet now than when the systems were first installed isn't relevant. That's the nature of the business: if it isn't growing, you have a big problem.  People are using more services from my employer too than when we started. I had to add capacity to keep up. So do the other engineering groups.

Wireless is useful to cover a wide area with sparse usage, but costs quickly mount when the usage begins to increase. With a fixed solution, once you have fibre in the ground, you can upgrade the backhaul almost ad infinitum. With wireless, you can't.

Perhaps when we are talking about 1 single subscriber out in the middle of nowhere he or she would be better off stumping up for satellite, but if the alternative to DSL or fibre is an RBI site then that's going to cost as much if not more than upgraded DSL. A cell site on the side of the road in suburbia costs a quarter of a million dollars - assuming you actually get to build it over the objections of the local NIMBYs and BANANAs - I can't see a rural one being a whole lot cheaper than a DSL cabinet upgrade.

I stand by my original comment that - absent the very extreme cases - the government should throw their money at a permanent solution to rural access issues, not one that guarantees they will remain a decade behind.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


306 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 66


  Reply # 1024443 13-Apr-2014 17:37
Send private message

To give an idea what it cost per metre of fibre put in the grpund it is roughly $40-45 a metre so laying it out rurally at that cost doesnt give a good enough return as does laying it in town

'That VDSL Cat'
9709 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2259

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1024445 13-Apr-2014 17:40
Send private message

Cbfd: To give an idea what it cost per metre of fibre put in the grpund it is roughly $40-45 a metre so laying it out rurally at that cost doesnt give a good enough return as does laying it in town


hm.. that would stack up pretty fast...




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


6829 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2329

Trusted

  Reply # 1024451 13-Apr-2014 17:59
2 people support this post
Send private message

SaltyNZ:

I stand by my original comment that - absent the very extreme cases - the government should throw their money at a permanent solution to rural access issues, not one that guarantees they will remain a decade behind.


I just cringe when people think its a good idea to spend millions if not close to a billion to provide a slightly better service to the 5% of our population.





 


5389 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2457

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1024458 13-Apr-2014 18:19
Send private message

And if they had done 2 minutes of research they would have found: "RBI Broadband > 1 Mbps between Jul-2015 and Jun-2016"
But probably when this happens, they will attribute it to their moaning and complaining.

Nothing to see here :)





Chorus has spent $1.4 billion on making their xDSL broadband network faster. If your still stuck on ADSL or VDSL, why not spend from $150 on a master filter install to make sure you are getting the most out of your connection?
I install - Naked DSL, DSL Master Splitters, VoIP, data cabling and general computer support for home and small business.
Rural Broadband RBI installer for Ultimate Broadband and Full Flavour

 

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com


12563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4157

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1024462 13-Apr-2014 18:26
Send private message

It's interesting.

Not exactly related but sort of, in the UK you can issue a notice to a water company in England & Wales requiring them to use their compulsory purchase powers to lay water and sewage mains across other people's land to your home.

If the notice is valid (i.e. correctly worded) then they MUST comply and they can only charge you a small statutory connection fee, even if the cost runs to hundreds of thousands of pounds.

So in world terms, there is some kind of precedent for governments to force private companies to supply customers regardless of cost.

I'm not suggesting we have that here, just mentioning it as a matter of general interest.





6829 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2329

Trusted

  Reply # 1024469 13-Apr-2014 18:39
Send private message

Geektastic: 
So in world terms, there is some kind of precedent for governments to force private companies to supply customers regardless of cost.


I would leave this country if those laws came into place.




 


1433 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 273

Subscriber

  Reply # 1024470 13-Apr-2014 18:44
Send private message

Just going to throw this out there:

1) They chose to live in the middle of no-where and expect first world service delivered? maybe I'm suffering from urban entitlement but if I decided to live somewhere then isn't it my responsibility to accept that I maybe giving up some conveniences associated with living in a big city?

2) Someone raised the issue of farms - lets remember one thing, many farmers run their business either at break even or a loss as to avoid paying tax (my uncle did it for years - paid himself a pittance and ran all the expenses through the farm) so the idea that the farmers 'are getting back what they put it' would only be true if  farmers were actually paying taxes equal or greater than the amount of money that would be required for broadband investment.




Laptop: MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017)
Desktop: iMac (27-inch, 2017)
Smartphone: iPhone Xs Max 256GB 'Space Grey'
Additional devices: Unifi Security Gateway, Unifi Switch, Unifi AP AC HD, Unifi Cloud Key, Apple TV 4K 64GB
Services: iCloud, YouTube Premium, Wordpress, Skinny

 


3980 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2686

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1024471 13-Apr-2014 18:46
Send private message

Geektastic: It's interesting.

Not exactly related but sort of, in the UK you can issue a notice to a water company in England & Wales requiring them to use their compulsory purchase powers to lay water and sewage mains across other people's land to your home.

If the notice is valid (i.e. correctly worded) then they MUST comply and they can only charge you a small statutory connection fee, even if the cost runs to hundreds of thousands of pounds.

So in world terms, there is some kind of precedent for governments to force private companies to supply customers regardless of cost.

I'm not suggesting we have that here, just mentioning it as a matter of general interest.


I understand you're not suggesting we should have that here... I however am suggesting it's utterly stupid. (If it's even true, or current)

Cheers - N


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Donate via Givealittle


Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon introduces new Kindle with adjustable front light
Posted 21-Mar-2019 20:14


A call from the companies providing internet access for the great majority of New Zealanders, to the companies with the greatest influence over social media content
Posted 19-Mar-2019 15:21


Two e-scooter companies selected for Wellington trial
Posted 15-Mar-2019 17:33


GeForce GTX 1660 available now
Posted 15-Mar-2019 08:47


Artificial Intelligence to double the rate of innovation in New Zealand by 2021
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:47


LG demonstrates smart home concepts at LG InnoFest
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:45


New Zealanders buying more expensive smartphones
Posted 11-Mar-2019 09:52


2degrees Offers Amazon Prime Video to Broadband Customers
Posted 8-Mar-2019 14:10


D-Link ANZ launches D-Fend AC2600 Wi-Fi Router Protected by McAfee
Posted 7-Mar-2019 11:09


Slingshot commissions celebrities to design new modems
Posted 5-Mar-2019 08:58


Symantec Annual Threat Report reveals more ambitious, destructive and stealthy attacks
Posted 28-Feb-2019 10:14


FUJIFILM launches high performing X-T30
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:40


Netflix is killing content piracy says research
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:33


Trend Micro finds shifting threats require kiwis to rethink security priorities
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:27


Mainfreight uses Spark IoT Asset Tracking service
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:25



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.