Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13

gzt

11033 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1025762 15-Apr-2014 19:03
Send private message

I propose someone from the meritocracy or appointed by the bdfl edits this thread to remove the crap page killing formatting edit:on the previous page lol.

2651 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1025763 15-Apr-2014 19:11
One person supports this post
Send private message

Quite happy with current arrangements.

Not a fervent monarchist, but I can't see much upside in changing, so therefore have better things to worry about. It ain't broke, so there's no pressing need to fix it.

As long as we don't get a system which adds another layer of electioneering and politicking - of which we have quite enough - I'm content.

 
 
 
 




597 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1025766 15-Apr-2014 19:20
Send private message

JimmyH: Quite happy with current arrangements.

Not a fervent monarchist, but I can't see much upside in changing, so therefore have better things to worry about. It ain't broke, so there's no pressing need to fix it.

As long as we don't get a system which adds another layer of electioneering and politicking - of which we have quite enough - I'm content.


What if the change was something simple like removing the head of state and the governor general being voted in by the public at the same time as they vote like normal?

That would remove the monarchy side of things without drastically changing anything.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

5170 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1025768 15-Apr-2014 19:22
One person supports this post
Send private message

I would start with the axiom that anyone who wants to be in Parliament be banned from it. But I'm not sure where to go from there. Either you have the form of a democracy - in which case you stabilise on a two party system with parties that are as wildly different as Brie and Camembert, plus electioneering, or you have some other arrangement where you can't get rid of today's idiot/crook, even if only to replace him or her with another idiot/crook.

I personally like some form of revocable transferrable vote. For example, in an electorate, suppose there are 5 candidates, and they receive X votes in that electorate of Y total votes at the last election. In Parliament, the electorate gets Y votes out of Z total national votes, and each candidate casts X votes on any given motion in Parliament. The motion/bill is passed or failed based on those total numbers. But here's the thing, if I care particularly about some issue, I can temporarily withdraw my vote from my chosen candidate and cast it myself however I like.

It combines the ability of a citizen to get involved in a direct democracy with the deference we normally give our elected representatives.

However... I have no idea how you would do it in practice.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


14601 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1025771 15-Apr-2014 19:26
Send private message

If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 




597 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1025772 15-Apr-2014 19:26
Send private message

SaltyNZ: I would start with the axiom that anyone who wants to be in Parliament be banned from it. But I'm not sure where to go from there. Either you have the form of a democracy - in which case you stabilise on a two party system with parties that are as wildly different as Brie and Camembert, plus electioneering, or you have some other arrangement where you can't get rid of today's idiot/crook, even if only to replace him or her with another idiot/crook.

I personally like some form of revocable transferrable vote. For example, in an electorate, suppose there are 5 candidates, and they receive X votes in that electorate of Y total votes at the last election. In Parliament, the electorate gets Y votes out of Z total national votes, and each candidate casts X votes on any given motion in Parliament. The motion/bill is passed or failed based on those total numbers. But here's the thing, if I care particularly about some issue, I can temporarily withdraw my vote from my chosen candidate and cast it myself however I like.

It combines the ability of a citizen to get involved in a direct democracy with the deference we normally give our elected representatives.

However... I have no idea how you would do it in practice.


That sounds like a good way of doing things.

As for implementation, you would need a computer based voting system managed by the electoral commission where each person can manage their vote just by logging in online.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley



597 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1025774 15-Apr-2014 19:30
Send private message

KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.


True. But let's suppose that a party gets 75% of the seats in parliament, they would be incontestable and would no longer need to vote in order to pass legislation. If that occurs how do we mitigate the issue?




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

 
 
 
 


14601 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1025775 15-Apr-2014 19:33
Send private message

charsleysa:
KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.


True. But let's suppose that a party gets 75% of the seats in parliament, they would be incontestable and would no longer need to vote in order to pass legislation. If that occurs how do we mitigate the issue?


That can happen now




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 




597 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1025777 15-Apr-2014 19:39
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
charsleysa:
KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.


True. But let's suppose that a party gets 75% of the seats in parliament, they would be incontestable and would no longer need to vote in order to pass legislation. If that occurs how do we mitigate the issue?


That can happen now


That's why we have a governor general. They have to power to stop new legislations from being formed and dissolute parliament, though these are emergency reserve powers.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

14601 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1025778 15-Apr-2014 19:45
Send private message

charsleysa:
KiwiNZ:
charsleysa:
KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.


True. But let's suppose that a party gets 75% of the seats in parliament, they would be incontestable and would no longer need to vote in order to pass legislation. If that occurs how do we mitigate the issue?


That can happen now


That's why we have a governor general. They have to power to stop new legislations from being formed and dissolute parliament, though these are emergency reserve powers.


The Executive Council basically tells the GG what to do, Royal assent is automatic. There are reserve powers to dissolve parliament on advice by the executive.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 




597 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1025786 15-Apr-2014 19:54
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
charsleysa:
KiwiNZ:
charsleysa:
KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.


True. But let's suppose that a party gets 75% of the seats in parliament, they would be incontestable and would no longer need to vote in order to pass legislation. If that occurs how do we mitigate the issue?


That can happen now


That's why we have a governor general. They have to power to stop new legislations from being formed and dissolute parliament, though these are emergency reserve powers.


The Executive Council basically tells the GG what to do, Royal assent is automatic. There are reserve powers to dissolve parliament on advice by the executive.


True, we could just appoint the executive council as the backstop, but since the governor general is usually the one that appoints the members of the executive council we would have to use some sort of voting system in which candidates would run unaffiliated to any of the parties to minimise the risk of a bias executive council.




Regards
Stefan Andres Charsley

14601 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1025787 15-Apr-2014 20:01
Send private message

The elected Governments Cabinet members are the Executive Council, the GG chairs it but is not a member of it. We elect our law makers in a democratic process and they are the people that should govern not some absurd group you are suggesting.
Our system has worked well for a long time and provides a better system than any of the alternatives out there. It does not need fixing as it is not broken.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


9023 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1025799 15-Apr-2014 20:46
4 people support this post
Send private message

Meritocracy is a fundamentally and seriously flawed concept, as to measure "merit" requires a (human) value judgement to be placed on the very thing that the same people making that value judgement decide is worthy of measure.  See the problem? 

As for the suggestion that IQ should be used to select candidates for a "meritocratic" leadership, I truly hope people suggesting this are joking.  For better or worse, some of my personal friends are professors and other academics with (I'm sure but never actually asked) remarkably high IQs.  Despite being pretty good at what they do (for work), I can't think of one who'd be able to run a piss-up at a brewery - let alone run a country 

9023 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1025801 15-Apr-2014 20:49
Send private message

JimmyH: Quite happy with current arrangements.

Not a fervent monarchist, but I can't see much upside in changing, so therefore have better things to worry about. It ain't broke, so there's no pressing need to fix it.

As long as we don't get a system which adds another layer of electioneering and politicking - of which we have quite enough - I'm content.


I am too - quite happy with present arrangements (except I am a republican).
The failures aren't with the system we have, but public apathy and lack of education.

gzt

11033 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1025827 15-Apr-2014 21:22
Send private message

KiwiNZ: If we went down the road of dumping the current head of state we do not need to replace it. Simply use the current parliament without the Governor General.

At the mo the GG plays a critical role in forming a govt. I earlier proposed we keep the office but appoint/elect some retired judges (ie from a merit pool) to serve the same function instead.

Friendly question here. How do you propose this function is performed in the absence of a office GG?
Regards
-gzt

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Ring launches indoor-only security camera
Posted 23-Jan-2020 17:26


New report findings will help schools implement the digital technologies curriculum content
Posted 23-Jan-2020 17:25


N4L to upgrade & support wireless internet inside schools
Posted 23-Jan-2020 17:22


Netflix releases 21 Studio Ghibli works
Posted 22-Jan-2020 11:42


Vodafone integrates eSIM into device and wearable roadmap
Posted 17-Jan-2020 09:45


Do you need this camera app? Group investigates privacy implications
Posted 16-Jan-2020 03:30


JBL launches headphones range designed for gaming
Posted 13-Jan-2020 09:59


Withings introduces ScanWatch wearable combining ECG and sleep apnea detection
Posted 9-Jan-2020 18:34


NZ Police releases public app
Posted 8-Jan-2020 11:43


Suunto 7 combine sports and smart features on new smartwatch generation
Posted 7-Jan-2020 16:06


Intel brings innovation with technology spanning the cloud, network, edge and PC
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:54


AMD announces high performance desktop and ultrathin laptop processors
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:42


AMD unveils four new desktop and mobile GPUs including AMD Radeon RX 5600
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:32


Consolidation in video streaming market with Spark selling Lightbox to Sky
Posted 19-Dec-2019 09:09


Intel introduces cryogenic control chip to enable quantum computers
Posted 10-Dec-2019 21:32



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.