![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
'We love to buy books because we believe we’re buying the time to read them.' WARREN ZEVON
Dairyxox:
There were huge profits for some parties involved, and unfortunately it seems fairly legal (from afar).
Dairyxox:MikeB4:Fred99: "Strange" isn't quite how I'd put it. Anchorage make money by investment and divestment - that's what they do. Take it over, tart it up, flog it off. ASIC needs to investigate and find out if that tarting-up was a little too "creative". ASX also needs to have it cleared up, as if something dodgy did go on (likely IMO) then it destroys confidence in the market in general - especially for future IPOs.
Not that the investors who lost their nuts should expect anything back - it never seems to happen that way.
If you mean by "tart it up" they falsified the books that would be a serious fraud. I very much doubt a company who is in business to trade on the stock markets is going to risk it all on what is in reality a small
investment.
What is more than likely is four possible scenario's..
1. Gross mismanagement since the last fiscal reporting that has transformed the company viability.
2. Inventory sell down to prepare for change in direction.
3. Inventory sell down to reduce the stock on hand for possible buyout.
4. The stop credit by Panasonic may be the result of a billing dispute or errors. Larger companies often have stop credit, it does not necessarily mean they are doomed.
If you read the foragerfunds.com link provided a couple of times in this thread it fairly clearly shows whats happened, with much less speculation than your own posts...
Not trying to disrespect you, but its just painful seeing you go through all these scenarios when its already well outlined previously.
There were huge profits for some parties involved, and unfortunately it seems fairly legal (from afar).
Fred99:Dairyxox:
There were huge profits for some parties involved, and unfortunately it seems fairly legal (from afar).
I'd love to see a post-mortem on this. From what I can see, Anchorage seem to be a small group of Toorak private school types, with CPA/LLB and MBAs for cred, a couple of secretaries, presumably a rented office, and that's about it.
Of course that's it for them - nobody in their right mind would invest in another Anchorage "divestment" IPO. But a few hundred million divvied up between them, they're laughing and on to something else.
It's a symptom of something not quite right IMO. Wide boys.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
MikeB4:Dairyxox:MikeB4:Fred99: "Strange" isn't quite how I'd put it. Anchorage make money by investment and divestment - that's what they do. Take it over, tart it up, flog it off. ASIC needs to investigate and find out if that tarting-up was a little too "creative". ASX also needs to have it cleared up, as if something dodgy did go on (likely IMO) then it destroys confidence in the market in general - especially for future IPOs.
Not that the investors who lost their nuts should expect anything back - it never seems to happen that way.
If you mean by "tart it up" they falsified the books that would be a serious fraud. I very much doubt a company who is in business to trade on the stock markets is going to risk it all on what is in reality a small
investment.
What is more than likely is four possible scenario's..
1. Gross mismanagement since the last fiscal reporting that has transformed the company viability.
2. Inventory sell down to prepare for change in direction.
3. Inventory sell down to reduce the stock on hand for possible buyout.
4. The stop credit by Panasonic may be the result of a billing dispute or errors. Larger companies often have stop credit, it does not necessarily mean they are doomed.
If you read the foragerfunds.com link provided a couple of times in this thread it fairly clearly shows whats happened, with much less speculation than your own posts...
Not trying to disrespect you, but its just painful seeing you go through all these scenarios when its already well outlined previously.
There were huge profits for some parties involved, and unfortunately it seems fairly legal (from afar).
What.
I am not referring to the profits buy the buy and sell of DSE, I am referring to the apparent rapid decline since fiscal 2014.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Jaxson: Just rang to reconfirm the A6000 stock levels. Code is the formal Sony name of ILCE-A6000 but this doesn't appear on the website at all. Non in stock, all showing 1, which was dismissed by the staff member on the phone.
Jaxson: Total aside, but what's their point of difference now?...
Sideface
Dunnersfella: While they will
See themselves as competing with Noel Leeming
(Without Whitegoods) and JB HiFi (ditto - but also without most the media JB's have)...
In reality, with the level of gear they carry, they're pretty much in a bun fight with the Warehouse... Except, the Warehouse can out mussle them in every category.
tripp:
Like i said earlier if they did something good (i.e. apple products and laptops etc) train their staff in these products so they know what they are talking about then I think there is a place for them in the market.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |