Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15

gzt

9001 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1228


  Reply # 1045231 15-May-2014 00:13
Send private message

ajobbins: Some stats here.

Top 1% hold 16.4 percent of the wealth.

Bottom 50% hold only 5.2% of the wealth


What is this 'wealth' they are measuring here? Assets? Wages?

That is useful proxy for many other indicators but I expect you would get a better view from quality of life indicators. For instance here in Auckland it is very possible asset value (and or wage in many sectors) has increased substantially but quality of life has declined fundamentally (traffic, noise, air pollution, etc) due to a systemic lack of urban and suburban planning. Focus on monetary factors can easily obscure what is important.

509 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155
Inactive user


  Reply # 1045234 15-May-2014 00:31
Send private message

I don't really like to fit in the political spectrum, it seems like it was designed to dumb people down to think of every political concept along a single axis from left wing socialist communist dole bludgers through to right wing greedy neocon fascists. Worse: if you don't join one of those gangs you are a fence sitter. 

Communism and Socialism seem like they are dirty words in NZ, which sort of amuses me, I assumed advanced countries recognised that a communities with a wide socio demographic mean trouble, crime, poverty, suicide etc. 

I will probably vote labour green or Internet, not so much on policy but on the potential change a party could offer.
I certainly don't see the Greens as a 'communist threat'. I see a far more likely event in a huge corporation irreversibly influencing our laws and civil liberties for monetary gain. 

 
 
 
 


Awesome
4766 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1048

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045236 15-May-2014 00:41
Send private message

turnin: I certainly don't see the Greens as a 'communist threat'. I see a far more likely event in a huge corporation irreversibly influencing our laws and civil liberties for monetary gain. 


Or the US with the TPPA




Twitter: ajobbins


Awesome
4766 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1048

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045237 15-May-2014 00:43
Send private message

gzt: What is this 'wealth' they are measuring here? Assets? Wages?


Individual net worth. I believe there are also stats for income, but I haven't looked for those.




Twitter: ajobbins


4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 1045238 15-May-2014 00:58
Send private message

gzt: What is this 'wealth' they are measuring here? Assets? Wages?


There is a thing called the internet, it has information like that which you seek. Additionally AJobbins already provided a link to the source.

gzt: That is useful proxy for many other indicators but I expect you would get a better view from quality of life indicators. For instance here in Auckland it is very possible asset value (and or wage in many sectors) has increased substantially but quality of life has declined fundamentally (traffic, noise, air pollution, etc) due to a systemic lack of urban and suburban planning. Focus on monetary factors can easily obscure what is important.


Seriously? If traffic/noise/air pollution are "what is important" in terms of quality of life indicators for you, then you have amassed a degree of wealth and comfort that 50% of New Zealanders are wholly unable to relate to. For them quality of life is things like paying the rent, having enough food and so forth - you know, the bottom tier of Maslow's heirarchy? 

You also seem to have no appreciation for what it means to have valuable assets like housing. For the bottom 50% their quality of life is only as secure as their next pay check, try and really understand that. Having assets may not improve the quality of your life in some respects, but it provides a large buffer against difficult circumstances. If I lost my job tomorrow I have nearly a half million dollars of security to see me through to my next paid gig. Attempting to undercut the value of assets in this discussion as a means of trying to suggest there isn't a very real problem with the distribution of wealth, or that it isn't quite of the magnitude suggested, is intellectually dishonest.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


gzt

9001 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1228


  Reply # 1045312 15-May-2014 08:47
Send private message

If you read my post again you will see it does nothing to suggest there is no problem with wealth distribution. The rest of your assumptions seem to flow from that.

Link goes to pdf, not available on my mobile platform.

3668 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 545

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045314 15-May-2014 08:50
Send private message

ajobbins:
alasta: It would be really interesting to know what proportion of national wealth is controlled by the top 1% in NZ.


Some stats here.

Top 1% hold 16.4 percent of the wealth.

Bottom 50% hold only 5.2% of the wealth


That is really interesting - thanks for sharing.

One problem I can see with this representation is that NZ has an aging population, and people tend to accumulate more wealth as they age due to the need to support their retirement. The report that you linked to notes that people aged over 45 make up 45% of the population and hold 65% of wealth. In contrast the graph that you provided shows that the most wealthy 45% of the population control about 90% of total wealth.

If my reasoning is right then I think this tells us that the aging population explains some but not all of the skew in overall wealth distribution.

Onward
10950 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4801

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045317 15-May-2014 08:56
One person supports this post
Send private message

Stats will show any picture the drawer so desires.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


3962 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1525

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045319 15-May-2014 09:02
Send private message

Charles Stross - sci-fi author - has an interesting post on the topic of changes in wealth distributions especially as it relates to age differences. Obviously he's based in the UK, but many of the same forces are at work all over the west: children starting their adult lives with a massive debt load simply in order to be able to get in on the bottom rung of the employment ladder, and little or no chance of ever owning their own house.




iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


2953 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1064


  Reply # 1045380 15-May-2014 11:16
Send private message

That graph is an unusual way of presenting the data.

If everyone had equal wealth then the line would run at 45 degree up the middle of the graph

Wealth should be equity - property, savings shares etc.  Income is meaningless unless you also look at costs.  It's possible to have a high income but low wealth simply by spending too much.

Very difficult to acquire wealth on low income because you spoend most/all f whta you earn to get by.  S cary fact in that a number of NZrs have negative wealth - e.g. they have no savings or assets but have car loan or HP.

I wonder if these people are included in the graph.

I'm not in a position to dispute the pattern, but I seriously question how they would collect this data.  You would have to cobble together a lot of info to figure out a person's wealth - house value, mortgae, loan, credit cards, kiwi saver, shares.




Mike

3668 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 545

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045456 15-May-2014 12:02
Send private message

MikeAqua: If everyone had equal wealth then the line would run at 45 degree up the middle of the graph


Yes, so the graph should be slightly bowed if we accept that to a reasonable degree some people should legimiately have greater wealth. Slightly bowed is probably what you get if you adjust for the aging population as I referred to above, so I'm still really doubting whether we have a wealth distribution problem.


Wealth should be equity - property, savings shares etc.  Income is meaningless unless you also look at costs.  It's possible to have a high income but low wealth simply by spending too much.


Yet we tax people mainly based on income rather than wealth. This is why I am more motivated to manage my costs and take care good care of my assets than I am to pursue more income.

I think Gareth Morgan has proposed a wealth tax which is something that probably should be looked at. I also like the idea of a capital gains tax in principle, although the jury is still out regarding the complexity and administrative cost.

2953 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1064


  Reply # 1045500 15-May-2014 12:35
One person supports this post
Send private message

The trouble with wealth tax is that wealth isn't always liquid. 

If someone owns substantial non-cash wealth but has low income how do they pay their tax?  They would have to borrow to pay it, or sell those assets.





Mike

Fully Operational
3342 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1087

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045552 15-May-2014 13:35
Send private message

MikeAqua: The trouble with wealth tax is that wealth isn't always liquid. 

If someone owns substantial non-cash wealth but has low income how do they pay their tax?  They would have to borrow to pay it, or sell those assets.



Diddums

3962 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1525

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045556 15-May-2014 13:58
Send private message

MikeAqua: The trouble with wealth tax is that wealth isn't always liquid. 

If someone owns substantial non-cash wealth but has low income how do they pay their tax?  They would have to borrow to pay it, or sell those assets.



I thought the government was actively trying to discourage having lots of wealth tied up in non-liquid assets, like, for instance, having 5 rental properties, because it would be better invested in something that generates benefits to the economy. So in that respect, such a tax would move things in the direction our nominally right-wing government wishes things to go, no?




iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Awesome
4766 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1048

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1045567 15-May-2014 14:27
2 people support this post
Send private message

We are firmly off topic!




Twitter: ajobbins


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Symantec protects data everywhere with Information Centric Security
Posted 21-Sep-2017 15:33


FUJIFILM introduces X-E3 mirrorless camera with wireless connectivity
Posted 18-Sep-2017 13:53


Vodafone announces new plans with bigger data bundles
Posted 15-Sep-2017 10:51


Skinny launches phone with support for te reo Maori
Posted 14-Sep-2017 08:39


If Vodafone dropping mail worries you, you’re doing online wrong
Posted 11-Sep-2017 13:54


Vodafone New Zealand deploy live 400 gigabit system
Posted 11-Sep-2017 11:07


OPPO camera phones now available at PB Tech
Posted 11-Sep-2017 09:56


Norton Wi-Fi Privacy — Easy, flawed VPN
Posted 11-Sep-2017 09:48


Lenovo reveals new ThinkPad A Series
Posted 8-Sep-2017 14:37


Huawei passes Apple for the first time to capture the second spot globally
Posted 8-Sep-2017 10:45


Vodafone initiative enhances te reo Maori pronunciation on Google Maps
Posted 8-Sep-2017 10:40


Voyager Internet expand local internet phone services company with Conversant acquisition
Posted 6-Sep-2017 18:27


NOW Expands in to Tauranga
Posted 5-Sep-2017 18:16


Windows 10 Fall Creators Update coming Oct. 17
Posted 4-Sep-2017 14:10


Garmin introduce Garmin vivoactive 3
Posted 1-Sep-2017 18:38



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.