Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
1990 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 883

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043809 14-May-2014 13:32
Send private message

old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:

Onward
11346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043813 14-May-2014 13:35
Send private message

MikeAqua: The point is you can do it all.  It's not either or.  There is strong Tourism in Nordic countries as well as extractive industries and primary production.  You don't have to 'wreck' the landscape either.  Have you been to the Coromandel? Tourism scenery and mining.  Ditto Central Otago. Ditto West Coast.  Taupo has tourism scenery and geothermal electricity.

You do have to manage well to balance activities.  Where does good management happen? In wealthy countries.

How do countries get wealthy? Generally, by using natural resources.

But in NZ we have gone banaas: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone

Just print more money ...

KiwiNZ:

we have more to gain from tourism and sustainable Agriculture than we have from holes in the ground and wrecked landscape


I have been to the Coromandel the giant hole in the ground is about as an attractive tourist site that a City landfill would make.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


1985 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043818 14-May-2014 13:40
2 people support this post
Send private message

dafman:
old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:


"an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population" Got some data to back that up? I'm not in the wealthiest 1% and I've definitely benefited from the economic growth of the past 10 years.




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


1990 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 883

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043822 14-May-2014 13:43
Send private message

geekiegeek:
dafman:
old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:


"an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population" Got some data to back that up? I'm not in the wealthiest 1% and I've definitely benefited from the economic growth of the past 10 years.


A quick google search ...

The recovery that officially began in mid-2009 hasn’t arrived in most Americans’ paychecks. In 2010, the top 1 percent of U.S. families captured as much as 93 percent of the nation’s income growth, according to a March paper by Emmanuel Saez, a University of California at Berkeley economist who studied Internal Revenue Service data.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-02/top-1-got-93-of-income-growth-as-rich-poor-gap-widened.html

Onward
11346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043835 14-May-2014 13:57
2 people support this post
Send private message

It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Awesome
4774 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1057

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043843 14-May-2014 14:06
Send private message

KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.




Twitter: ajobbins


Onward
11346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043847 14-May-2014 14:08
Send private message

ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.


There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1990 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 883

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043854 14-May-2014 14:20
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.


There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


Not exactly true. Wall Street = very high up the chain. Yet, when they screwed up, american taxpayers bailed them out. No great risk exposure there. Contrast that with those well down the income chain that lost their houses as a consequence of the GFC.

Arguably, the income gap in the US has become largely structural and permanent, with very little risk, at all, to those at the top 1% of the chain.

594 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 235

Subscriber

  Reply # 1043855 14-May-2014 14:22
Send private message

KiwiNZ: 

There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


There are different types of risk lower down the chain

Onward
11346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043857 14-May-2014 14:23
Send private message

Again you are talking US not NZ we have a vastly different set of circumstances and system.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Awesome
4774 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1057

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043859 14-May-2014 14:25
2 people support this post
Send private message

KiwiNZ: There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


I'm not sure of your point. And there is often a transfer of risk exposure, and people have different 'risk exposure' depending where on that ladder you sit.

For the 1%, the risk might be they make a bad business decision that means they have to sell their yacht and have to wait an extra year before they upgrade their Mercedes.

For someone at the bottom on the ladder, the risk might be that their boss made a bad business decision and choose to lay off staff rather than wait another year to upgrade their Mercedes. Pushing that person out of the labour force and potentially onto some kind of welfare.

Those at the top get to make the decisions, but people all the way up and down the ladder often suffer the negative consequences of such risks, and those at the bottom suffer dis-proportionally more. And we have seen that the positive outcomes of the risk taking isn't shared int he same way, it's mostly kept by those who took the risk. Basically, those in power are great at sharing the pain and keeping the gain.

Just look at the many company CEOs who are telling their staff how tough the economy is, and how they need to exercise financial restraint. I've seen or heard of many companies with wage and/or bonus freezes among regular employees over the last few years. At the same time however, the executives are all patting themselves on the back for how well they have managed their business through the hard times, and rewarding themselves with HUGE salaries and bonuses as a result. Income growth at the exective level has continues to climb at exponential rates throughout the GFC despite everyone else staying relatively static.




Twitter: ajobbins


Onward
11346 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043861 14-May-2014 14:36
2 people support this post
Send private message

ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


I'm not sure of your point. And there is often a transfer of risk exposure, and people have different 'risk exposure' depending where on that ladder you sit.

For the 1%, the risk might be they make a bad business decision that means they have to sell their yacht and have to wait an extra year before they upgrade their Mercedes.

For someone at the bottom on the ladder, the risk might be that their boss made a bad business decision and choose to lay off staff rather than wait another year to upgrade their Mercedes. Pushing that person out of the labour force and potentially onto some kind of welfare.

Those at the top get to make the decisions, but people all the way up and down the ladder often suffer the negative consequences of such risks, and those at the bottom suffer dis-proportionally more. And we have seen that the positive outcomes of the risk taking isn't shared int he same way, it's mostly kept by those who took the risk. Basically, those in power are great at sharing the pain and keeping the gain.

Just look at the many company CEOs who are telling their staff how tough the economy is, and how they need to exercise financial restraint. I've seen or heard of many companies with wage and/or bonus freezes among regular employees over the last few years. At the same time however, the executives are all patting themselves on the back for how well they have managed their business through the hard times, and rewarding themselves with HUGE salaries and bonuses as a result. Income growth at the exective level has continues to climb at exponential rates throughout the GFC despite everyone else staying relatively static.


You start a job, you may have to buy some clothes and a bus ticket, or parking permit and go to work 5 days a week. If you start a business you may have borrowed extensively against your home and other property etc etc and then to make that start up work your hours are not 9 to 5  with an hour for lunch but 7 to 11 with the luxury of mabe a 10am start over the pseudo weekend.

When financial and trading climates are hard the work of senior executives is considerably harder and the hours considerably longer, (something I have watched with my wife), if they keep a company trading etc through those times then they deserve the income they receive. 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1985 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043882 14-May-2014 14:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

what is the definition of the 1% in NZ, considering the fact that we only have 3 billionaires.

I'd also love for someone to point out to me who exactly "John Keys rich mates" are. I'm guessing that the greens idea of who is rich is probably different from that of Labour and different again from that of National. 




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


1323 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 540


  Reply # 1043884 14-May-2014 14:58
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
MikeAqua: The point is you can do it all.  It's not either or.  There is strong Tourism in Nordic countries as well as extractive industries and primary production.  You don't have to 'wreck' the landscape either.  Have you been to the Coromandel? Tourism scenery and mining.  Ditto Central Otago. Ditto West Coast.  Taupo has tourism scenery and geothermal electricity.

You do have to manage well to balance activities.  Where does good management happen? In wealthy countries.

How do countries get wealthy? Generally, by using natural resources.

But in NZ we have gone banaas: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone

Just print more money ...

KiwiNZ:

we have more to gain from tourism and sustainable Agriculture than we have from holes in the ground and wrecked landscape


I have been to the Coromandel the giant hole in the ground is about as an attractive tourist site that a City landfill would make.


I have been to the city landfill, and I much prefer looking into the Martha mine. OTOH, any given beach or forest park beats the hell out of either of them.

Awesome
4774 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1057

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043888 14-May-2014 15:05
Send private message

geekiegeek: what is the definition of the 1% in NZ, considering the fact that we only have 3 billionaires.

I'd also love for someone to point out to me who exactly "John Keys rich mates" are. I'm guessing that the greens idea of who is rich is probably different from that of Labour and different again from that of National. 


Ummm.. the definition is the 1%. The top one percent of wealth holders.




Twitter: ajobbins


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Phone prices rising as users move upmarket
Posted 24-Nov-2017 17:16


Talking net neutrality on RNZ Nine-to-Noon
Posted 24-Nov-2017 12:11


Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.