Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
2293 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1073

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043809 14-May-2014 13:32
Send private message

old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:

12416 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5816

Trusted

  Reply # 1043813 14-May-2014 13:35
Send private message

MikeAqua: The point is you can do it all.  It's not either or.  There is strong Tourism in Nordic countries as well as extractive industries and primary production.  You don't have to 'wreck' the landscape either.  Have you been to the Coromandel? Tourism scenery and mining.  Ditto Central Otago. Ditto West Coast.  Taupo has tourism scenery and geothermal electricity.

You do have to manage well to balance activities.  Where does good management happen? In wealthy countries.

How do countries get wealthy? Generally, by using natural resources.

But in NZ we have gone banaas: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone

Just print more money ...

KiwiNZ:

we have more to gain from tourism and sustainable Agriculture than we have from holes in the ground and wrecked landscape


I have been to the Coromandel the giant hole in the ground is about as an attractive tourist site that a City landfill would make.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043818 14-May-2014 13:40
2 people support this post
Send private message

dafman:
old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:


"an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population" Got some data to back that up? I'm not in the wealthiest 1% and I've definitely benefited from the economic growth of the past 10 years.




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


2293 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1073

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043822 14-May-2014 13:43
Send private message

geekiegeek:
dafman:
old3eyes:
code15: Thinking long term here:

Vote labour/greens to end up like a Nordic country.



You mean taxed to the hilt and cradle to grave welfare system??


You mean compared to the other choice, with it's growing number of tent cities, and an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population?

ps. and with their own cradle to grave welfare system to boot ... well, for investment bankers, anyway (-:


"an economy where over 90% of the economic growth over the last 10 years has benefited the wealthiest 1% of the population" Got some data to back that up? I'm not in the wealthiest 1% and I've definitely benefited from the economic growth of the past 10 years.


A quick google search ...

The recovery that officially began in mid-2009 hasn’t arrived in most Americans’ paychecks. In 2010, the top 1 percent of U.S. families captured as much as 93 percent of the nation’s income growth, according to a March paper by Emmanuel Saez, a University of California at Berkeley economist who studied Internal Revenue Service data.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-02/top-1-got-93-of-income-growth-as-rich-poor-gap-widened.html

12416 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5816

Trusted

  Reply # 1043835 14-May-2014 13:57
2 people support this post
Send private message

It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Awesome
4794 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1060

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043843 14-May-2014 14:06
Send private message

KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.




Twitter: ajobbins


12416 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5816

Trusted

  Reply # 1043847 14-May-2014 14:08
Send private message

ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.


There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2293 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1073

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043854 14-May-2014 14:20
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: It is a mistake to transfer the American experience to NZ, we have vastly different systems.


Yes and no.

Both have opted for a 'trickle down' wealth approach, under the ideology that if we promote economic growth the benefits will flow downwards and everyone will be better off. The reality of these policies (Worse in the US, but also happening in NZ) is that the higher up that chain you are, the bigger slice of the growth pie you get. And at some point it turns negative. Those at the lower end of the scale often suffer as a result of such policies, with even more transfer of wealth to the top.

We have seen this is both places (and others) by the growing gaps in income and wealth distribution.


There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


Not exactly true. Wall Street = very high up the chain. Yet, when they screwed up, american taxpayers bailed them out. No great risk exposure there. Contrast that with those well down the income chain that lost their houses as a consequence of the GFC.

Arguably, the income gap in the US has become largely structural and permanent, with very little risk, at all, to those at the top 1% of the chain.

643 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 261

Subscriber

  Reply # 1043855 14-May-2014 14:22
Send private message

KiwiNZ: 

There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


There are different types of risk lower down the chain

12416 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5816

Trusted

  Reply # 1043857 14-May-2014 14:23
Send private message

Again you are talking US not NZ we have a vastly different set of circumstances and system.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Awesome
4794 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1060

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043859 14-May-2014 14:25
2 people support this post
Send private message

KiwiNZ: There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


I'm not sure of your point. And there is often a transfer of risk exposure, and people have different 'risk exposure' depending where on that ladder you sit.

For the 1%, the risk might be they make a bad business decision that means they have to sell their yacht and have to wait an extra year before they upgrade their Mercedes.

For someone at the bottom on the ladder, the risk might be that their boss made a bad business decision and choose to lay off staff rather than wait another year to upgrade their Mercedes. Pushing that person out of the labour force and potentially onto some kind of welfare.

Those at the top get to make the decisions, but people all the way up and down the ladder often suffer the negative consequences of such risks, and those at the bottom suffer dis-proportionally more. And we have seen that the positive outcomes of the risk taking isn't shared int he same way, it's mostly kept by those who took the risk. Basically, those in power are great at sharing the pain and keeping the gain.

Just look at the many company CEOs who are telling their staff how tough the economy is, and how they need to exercise financial restraint. I've seen or heard of many companies with wage and/or bonus freezes among regular employees over the last few years. At the same time however, the executives are all patting themselves on the back for how well they have managed their business through the hard times, and rewarding themselves with HUGE salaries and bonuses as a result. Income growth at the exective level has continues to climb at exponential rates throughout the GFC despite everyone else staying relatively static.




Twitter: ajobbins


12416 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5816

Trusted

  Reply # 1043861 14-May-2014 14:36
2 people support this post
Send private message

ajobbins:
KiwiNZ: There is also the other aspect the higher up the chain the greater risk exposure.


I'm not sure of your point. And there is often a transfer of risk exposure, and people have different 'risk exposure' depending where on that ladder you sit.

For the 1%, the risk might be they make a bad business decision that means they have to sell their yacht and have to wait an extra year before they upgrade their Mercedes.

For someone at the bottom on the ladder, the risk might be that their boss made a bad business decision and choose to lay off staff rather than wait another year to upgrade their Mercedes. Pushing that person out of the labour force and potentially onto some kind of welfare.

Those at the top get to make the decisions, but people all the way up and down the ladder often suffer the negative consequences of such risks, and those at the bottom suffer dis-proportionally more. And we have seen that the positive outcomes of the risk taking isn't shared int he same way, it's mostly kept by those who took the risk. Basically, those in power are great at sharing the pain and keeping the gain.

Just look at the many company CEOs who are telling their staff how tough the economy is, and how they need to exercise financial restraint. I've seen or heard of many companies with wage and/or bonus freezes among regular employees over the last few years. At the same time however, the executives are all patting themselves on the back for how well they have managed their business through the hard times, and rewarding themselves with HUGE salaries and bonuses as a result. Income growth at the exective level has continues to climb at exponential rates throughout the GFC despite everyone else staying relatively static.


You start a job, you may have to buy some clothes and a bus ticket, or parking permit and go to work 5 days a week. If you start a business you may have borrowed extensively against your home and other property etc etc and then to make that start up work your hours are not 9 to 5  with an hour for lunch but 7 to 11 with the luxury of mabe a 10am start over the pseudo weekend.

When financial and trading climates are hard the work of senior executives is considerably harder and the hours considerably longer, (something I have watched with my wife), if they keep a company trading etc through those times then they deserve the income they receive. 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 354

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043882 14-May-2014 14:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

what is the definition of the 1% in NZ, considering the fact that we only have 3 billionaires.

I'd also love for someone to point out to me who exactly "John Keys rich mates" are. I'm guessing that the greens idea of who is rich is probably different from that of Labour and different again from that of National. 




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


1365 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 578


  Reply # 1043884 14-May-2014 14:58
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
MikeAqua: The point is you can do it all.  It's not either or.  There is strong Tourism in Nordic countries as well as extractive industries and primary production.  You don't have to 'wreck' the landscape either.  Have you been to the Coromandel? Tourism scenery and mining.  Ditto Central Otago. Ditto West Coast.  Taupo has tourism scenery and geothermal electricity.

You do have to manage well to balance activities.  Where does good management happen? In wealthy countries.

How do countries get wealthy? Generally, by using natural resources.

But in NZ we have gone banaas: Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anyone

Just print more money ...

KiwiNZ:

we have more to gain from tourism and sustainable Agriculture than we have from holes in the ground and wrecked landscape


I have been to the Coromandel the giant hole in the ground is about as an attractive tourist site that a City landfill would make.


I have been to the city landfill, and I much prefer looking into the Martha mine. OTOH, any given beach or forest park beats the hell out of either of them.

Awesome
4794 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1060

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1043888 14-May-2014 15:05
Send private message

geekiegeek: what is the definition of the 1% in NZ, considering the fact that we only have 3 billionaires.

I'd also love for someone to point out to me who exactly "John Keys rich mates" are. I'm guessing that the greens idea of who is rich is probably different from that of Labour and different again from that of National. 


Ummm.. the definition is the 1%. The top one percent of wealth holders.




Twitter: ajobbins


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.