Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
1053 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 719

Subscriber

  Reply # 1077406 30-Jun-2014 22:04
Send private message

http://www.espnfc.com/fifa-world-cup/story/1922974/uruguay-president-jose-mujica-slams-fifa-over-fascist-ban-of-luis-suarez


Uruguay continuing to make a tool of itself over a total idiot. President now describes the ban as "fascist".

7659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 1077582 1-Jul-2014 08:47
Send private message

David Letterman summed this incident up pretty well the other nite "In soccer when you get bitten on the shoulder you always fall down don't you?"

 

There was an item on the NZ news last nite showing all the flops and falls from different angles  and local soccer people saying that they need video refs to stamp out this cheating..

 

 

 

 




Regards,

Old3eyes


 
 
 
 


17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1077592 1-Jul-2014 09:14
Send private message

Yes they do, no FIFA won't have a bar of it. It's been discussed for decades but at least they allow goal line video technology. Who knows in a 100 years they might use more refereeing technology.

Diving had been prominent for about a decade now.

17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1077595 1-Jul-2014 09:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

and it's not just to milk penalties, but free kicks and red cards



17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1077598 1-Jul-2014 09:21
One person supports this post
Send private message

very entertaining


1198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 110


  Reply # 1077750 1-Jul-2014 12:28
Send private message

joker97: Yes they do, no FIFA won't have a bar of it. It's been discussed for decades but at least they allow goal line video technology. Who knows in a 100 years they might use more refereeing technology.

Diving had been prominent for about a decade now.


The fundamental purpose of the game is to keep the rules simple and allow it to be played without the need for any technology.  It therefore relies on the character of the referees in the game - note that both sides have the same referee, its just a matter of how they make use of it.

Diving is simply a technique to emphasis that the opposing player didn't come into contact with the ball before the player - its a technique used to emphasis something that might be missed if the referee turns out to be 'short sighted'.   However, diving in front of ones own goal runs the risk of allowing the opposing player to score should the referee decide it was fair play.

Part of the skill in tackling another player is in ensuring one gets the ball first - quite a few players are good at this, so it can be quite difficult for an opposing player to set up a dive scenario in that case.  However, it appears that in this world cup, some have attempted this directly in front of the referee who has turned out to be not as short sighted as thought.







Software Engineer

 


7659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 1077756 1-Jul-2014 12:35
Send private message

TwoSeven:
joker97: Yes they do, no FIFA won't have a bar of it. It's been discussed for decades but at least they allow goal line video technology. Who knows in a 100 years they might use more refereeing technology.

Diving had been prominent for about a decade now.


The fundamental purpose of the game is to keep the rules simple and allow it to be played without the need for any technology.  It therefore relies on the character of the referees in the game - note that both sides have the same referee, its just a matter of how they make use of it.

Diving is simply a technique to emphasis that the opposing player didn't come into contact with the ball before the player - its a technique used to emphasis something that might be missed if the referee turns out to be 'short sighted'.   However, diving in front of ones own goal runs the risk of allowing the opposing player to score should the referee decide it was fair play.

Part of the skill in tackling another player is in ensuring one gets the ball first - quite a few players are good at this, so it can be quite difficult for an opposing player to set up a dive scenario in that case.  However, it appears that in this world cup, some have attempted this directly in front of the referee who has turned out to be not as short sighted as thought.





Don't care how you try to justify diving but it's still cheating and needs to be sorted before the TAB starts to run odds on who will dive first in the next game..




Regards,

Old3eyes


17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1077765 1-Jul-2014 12:41
Send private message

i have always maintain, to my friends, i support teams and players that don't dive.

unfortunately they never make it very far. *boo

(having said that germany have been pretty clean in that respect but because i don't follow them a lot i cannot really say)

1198 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 110


  Reply # 1078080 1-Jul-2014 17:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

old3eyes:
TwoSeven:
joker97: Yes they do, no FIFA won't have a bar of it. It's been discussed for decades but at least they allow goal line video technology. Who knows in a 100 years they might use more refereeing technology.

Diving had been prominent for about a decade now.


The fundamental purpose of the game is to keep the rules simple and allow it to be played without the need for any technology.  It therefore relies on the character of the referees in the game - note that both sides have the same referee, its just a matter of how they make use of it.

Diving is simply a technique to emphasis that the opposing player didn't come into contact with the ball before the player - its a technique used to emphasis something that might be missed if the referee turns out to be 'short sighted'.   However, diving in front of ones own goal runs the risk of allowing the opposing player to score should the referee decide it was fair play.

Part of the skill in tackling another player is in ensuring one gets the ball first - quite a few players are good at this, so it can be quite difficult for an opposing player to set up a dive scenario in that case.  However, it appears that in this world cup, some have attempted this directly in front of the referee who has turned out to be not as short sighted as thought.





Don't care how you try to justify diving but it's still cheating and needs to be sorted before the TAB starts to run odds on who will dive first in the next game..


I wouldn't classify it as cheating - bit hard to do that when the action of being ankle-tapped by the opposing player is the actual foul.   For those that don't play football, having someone run up behind you and put a studded boot into ones leg is a painful experience at the best of times, so its worth a fall and roll.   From the strategic point of view the opposing player is to touch the ball first, which means there is a certain way they have to make the tackle - if they play the odds and decide to go for the unfair way, then its up to the tackled player to call it out.

Basically, everyone knows the rules and everyone plays to them, strategic advantages taken when offered.




Software Engineer

 


17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1078084 1-Jul-2014 17:17
Send private message

You are describing the qualities of the best number 7 in the world :)
Edit: in rugby union

1053 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 719

Subscriber

  Reply # 1078129 1-Jul-2014 18:16
One person supports this post
Send private message

Call me crazy but do some of the participants of this thread actually watch the football for the football or do they merely watch it so they can get outraged about diving?

658 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  Reply # 1078510 2-Jul-2014 11:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

Watched for my 1st (almost) full game - Belgium vs USA.
Personally, really enjoyed the match. Arguably the skill level (finishing-wise) may not have been up there with other matches, but I thought it was played in a positive spirit (no one hunting for fouls in goal).
I thought Belgium deserved the win. Although, if the US had a striker half as good a goalie as Howard is it would've been a different story I think. Dempsey looked quite pedestrian. The Green goal was excellent.
One thing that struck me was how small the US players seemed in comparison. Maybe the bigger players are simply skimmed by one of the big 3 US sports?

17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1078926 2-Jul-2014 21:49
Send private message

zaptor: Watched for my 1st (almost) full game - Belgium vs USA.
Personally, really enjoyed the match. Arguably the skill level (finishing-wise) may not have been up there with other matches, but I thought it was played in a positive spirit (no one hunting for fouls in goal).
I thought Belgium deserved the win. Although, if the US had a striker half as good a goalie as Howard is it would've been a different story I think. Dempsey looked quite pedestrian. The Green goal was excellent.
One thing that struck me was how small the US players seemed in comparison. Maybe the bigger players are simply skimmed by one of the big 3 US sports?


yeah Belgium totally overwhelmed the Americans ... 27 shots vs 9: in rugby terms it's like 27 attempts at the tryline from the 22, vs 9

but in WC footy, however dominant you are the scores are generally within 1-2 points. imagine in cricket 365-364 or rugby 45-43 (or 8-7) ...

the way they are playing so well in extra time most of the time ... come the final everyone would be jogging!

tongue-in-cheek ... man a Colombia - Costa Rica final is still possible!
but somehow i doubt it ... let's see which way the ball spins

yummy days ahead

17479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1081301 5-Jul-2014 08:07
Send private message

my guess is Brazil - Colombia will be the most entertaining match in the entire tournament.

both teams just want to attack and is not afraid of scrambling to defend, whereas most teams play with the mindset of "if you don't concede you don't lose"

1499 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 581


  Reply # 1081454 5-Jul-2014 14:03
Send private message

joker97: my guess is Brazil - Colombia will be the most entertaining match in the entire tournament.

..


Pretty good match I thought.  Going to be tough for Brazil without Neymar and Silva  against the Germans





1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Talking net neutrality on RNZ Nine-to-Noon
Posted 24-Nov-2017 12:11


Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.