Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 147367 17-Jun-2014 13:43
Send private message

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11275741

H
e owes $367 MILLION Dollars to them. How was it, that they gave him a "line of credit" equal to that. Surely at 100M it would have been major alarm bells. 

Insanity.

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
5518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1592

Trusted

  Reply # 1067453 17-Jun-2014 13:45
Send private message

Wow...
Just how someone achieves that is insane. Maybe he should be bankrupted and pay all he has like every other fair citizen does.





Steam: Coil (Same photos as profile here)
Origin: Scranax
Currently playing on PC: Rust, Subnautica, CS:GO, AOE2 HD, BeamNG Drive, BF1.




15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1067455 17-Jun-2014 13:49
Send private message

TimA: Wow...
Just how someone achieves that is insane. Maybe he should be bankrupted and pay all he has like every other fair citizen does.



But surely heads should roll at the IRD too. Who lets people run those sort of debts up. 

 
 
 
 


1100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 786

Subscriber

  Reply # 1067457 17-Jun-2014 13:50
Send private message

This is actually all rather easy.

In this particular case, this guy isn't being chased just for his own tax debts. He was found to have assisted with tax evasion by others and in turn became liable for the tax that the IRD missed out on. So in THIS case, this explains why the amount is so huge - he wasn't given a line of credit or whatever - it was just that after a Court of Appeal judgment held him liable for assisting with tax evasion, the IRD presumably did the sums of tax losses incurred, added up the penalties and lost interest, then gave him a notice.

What people typically do after they receive such notices is they try to drag things out and contest the notice (it's actually very hard, you must do it within a prescribed time period and in prescribed forms). When they don't do things in time, the notice becomes final. Then the IRD goes to enforcement stage and usually tries to bankrupt the person.

This is coming from a RL lawyer...





15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1067458 17-Jun-2014 13:52
Send private message

dejadeadnz: This is actually all rather easy.

In this particular case, this guy isn't being chased just for his own tax debts. He was found to have assisted with tax evasion by others and in turn became liable for the tax that the IRD missed out on. So in THIS case, this explains why the amount is so huge - he wasn't given a line of credit or whatever - it was just that after a Court of Appeal judgment held him liable for assisting with tax evasion, the IRD presumably did the sums of tax losses incurred, added up the penalties and lost interest, then gave him a notice.

What people typically do after they receive such notices is they try to drag things out and contest the notice (it's actually very hard, you must do it within a prescribed time period and in prescribed forms). When they don't do things in time, the notice becomes final. Then the IRD goes to enforcement stage and usually tries to bankrupt the person.

This is coming from a RL lawyer...




Hmm, hard for me to understand how he could be solely liable, unless he was doing it without the permission of his clients, which would be a crime. 


11679 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5329

Trusted

  Reply # 1067459 17-Jun-2014 13:53
Send private message

The tax laws are a minefield




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2499 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 927

Subscriber

  Reply # 1067460 17-Jun-2014 13:54
Send private message

Russell's original tax bill was around $5m, but penalties and compound interest over 25 years inflated it to $138m at the time of his High Court case, and in excess of $177m when he went to the Court of Appeal.


That's how.




Windows 7 x64 // i5-3570K // 16GB DDR3-1600 // GTX660Ti 2GB // Samsung 830 120GB SSD // OCZ Agility4 120GB SSD // Samsung U28D590D @ 3840x2160 & Asus PB278Q @ 2560x1440
Samsung Galaxy S5 SM-G900I w/Spark

2075 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 228

Subscriber

  Reply # 1067472 17-Jun-2014 13:56
Send private message

The article states his tax bill was about $5m, the rest is fees and interest over a long period.

This doesn't seem to align with the info that he is being charged for helping other evade tax too.

I can't believe they can do that or every big accounting firm in NZ would be bankrupted.



15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1067473 17-Jun-2014 13:56
Send private message

Inphinity:
Russell's original tax bill was around $5m, but penalties and compound interest over 25 years inflated it to $138m at the time of his High Court case, and in excess of $177m when he went to the Court of Appeal.


That's how.


$5m to 367M, seems perfectly reasonable. NOT. 

How could it take 25 years to resolve. Good grief.

1100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 786

Subscriber

  Reply # 1067479 17-Jun-2014 14:02
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:


Hmm, hard for me to understand how he could be solely liable, unless he was doing it without the permission of his clients, which would be a crime. 



They won't be just chasing him and would certainly be chasing the primary dodgers as well. However, our law works (generally) like this when you and others jointly wrong somebody. If both A and B are found liable to have wronged C, unless the court explicitly makes a ruling as to rate of contribution by A and B, they are described as jointly and severally liable. What will happen in real life is that C will often choose to go after the party with the most ability to pay, let's say it is B in this instance. B can then seek a contribution from A but if A happens to have gone insolvent or can't pay for any reason, B will have to meet 100% of the liability or risk being made bankrupt or liquidated in the case of a company.

This is how, for example, the local councils frequently become the "last man standing" and end up paying everything to fix a leaky home when in reality their negligence might be far less contributory than, say, the building inspectors (the private ones back in those days) and engineers etc, who have all gone insolvent.


For people who are still confused: read the article again. This guy operated a tax evasion scheme from the 1970s to 2000 and channelled his own income and others' income through the scheme. However, a tax evasion scheme isn't a tax evasion scheme until the courts finally rule it is so. The Court of Appeal is our second highest court and the fact that the Supreme Court wasn't mentioned presumably means that his attempts to bring his appeal to there failed. So when you bear in mind that the IRD is calculating backdated, compounded interest on what taxes they should have received if the guy wasn't running a scheme over 20+ years ALONG with helping others evade taxes also (plus penalties that can run to 100%), the inflation isn't that extraordinary. 




3356 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1004


  Reply # 1067484 17-Jun-2014 14:04
Send private message

networkn: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11275741

H
e owes $367 MILLION Dollars to them. How was it, that they gave him a "line of credit" equal to that. Surely at 100M it would have been major alarm bells. 

Insanity.


Personally I think there is also a failing by the IRD. 

The penalties scheme is ridiculous and punishes excessively. 

Of course, this guy has himself to blame but these penalties are just stupid. 



15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1067486 17-Jun-2014 14:06
Send private message

surfisup1000:
networkn: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11275741

H
e owes $367 MILLION Dollars to them. How was it, that they gave him a "line of credit" equal to that. Surely at 100M it would have been major alarm bells. 

Insanity.


Personally I think there is also a failing by the IRD. 

The penalties scheme is ridiculous and punishes excessively. 

Of course, this guy has himself to blame but these penalties are just stupid. 


Not to mention that the Govt will have had that sitting in their "assets" side of the ledger, so when they bankrupt him getting all $11 he has on his person, they will be "out" by $367M.

Someone at the IRD should be facing prison for criminal negligence in my opinion. 

11679 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5329

Trusted

  Reply # 1067487 17-Jun-2014 14:06
Send private message

IRD is not responsible for setting the penalties, the Beehive is.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Talk DIrtY to me
4097 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2146

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1067497 17-Jun-2014 14:12
Send private message

$367 million? Might as well be 367 trillion. It's not like he can ever pay more than a fraction of the total.




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?




15772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4283

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1067533 17-Jun-2014 14:27
Send private message

KiwiNZ: IRD is not responsible for setting the penalties, the Beehive is.


I'm sorry, but common sense should prevail here.  Surely when it went from 5M to 100M with no signs of resolution, the Govt could have called a special meeting, and arranged a panel, even if the cost of that was $2m that meeting should have been binding and the matter should have been resolved.

11679 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5329

Trusted

  Reply # 1067553 17-Jun-2014 14:33
Send private message

networkn:
KiwiNZ: IRD is not responsible for setting the penalties, the Beehive is.


I'm sorry, but common sense should prevail here.  Surely when it went from 5M to 100M with no signs of resolution, the Govt could have called a special meeting, and arranged a panel, even if the cost of that was $2m that meeting should have been binding and the matter should have been resolved.


That unfortunately does not stop the statutory requirements, IRD  like other  Government agencies are subject to the empowering legislative requirements, any discretion if available must be authorised by that legislation.

If the statutes state that penalties etc must accrue and be levied by A+B+Cx D then they have no option




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 1 | 2
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43


Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27


2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25


Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28


Vocus Communications wins a place on the TaaS panel
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:16


SwipedOn raises $1 million capital
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:15


Slingshot offers unlimited gigabit fibre for under a ton
Posted 25-Jan-2018 13:51


Spark doubles down on wireless broadband
Posted 24-Jan-2018 15:44



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.