Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
2633 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 688

Subscriber

  Reply # 1077099 30-Jun-2014 15:26
Send private message
Talk DIrtY to me
4309 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2305

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1077104 30-Jun-2014 15:36
Send private message

I remember serving on a jury at the end of 2002. Back then district court judges were getting 200 grand a year. No wonder jurors get paid a pittance, there's no money left to pay them.




Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?


1160 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147


  Reply # 1077278 30-Jun-2014 19:34
Send private message

last time i got picked for jury duty i escaped/ was excused for the next three years.

tongue-out

12594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5908

Trusted

  Reply # 1077281 30-Jun-2014 19:38
One person supports this post
Send private message

To those who have posted that you feel the payment for Jury service is too low are you willing to pay increased taxes to fund such an increase?




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


14091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1788


  Reply # 1077285 30-Jun-2014 19:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

KiwiNZ: To those who have posted that you feel the payment for Jury service is too low are you willing to pay increased taxes to fund such an increase?

 

If they had less jurors, which I believe is proposed they wouldn't need to. But yes, I would be for more government money to go to paying jurors a reasonable wage. It is not as though jurors are going to take advantage either. It would also mean that juroies are better represented with our peers. If barristers and judges, and probably all other staff who work in the courts probably get paid more, then I don't see what the problem is paying them more.

1542 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 381


  Reply # 1077286 30-Jun-2014 19:56
Send private message

They need the excess numbers to cover other court cases running during the same week.

Plus, personally I'm happy with the amount paid as my employer continues to pay me regardless.

12594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5908

Trusted

  Reply # 1077287 30-Jun-2014 19:57
Send private message

MadEngineer: Why should you get paid more?

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/R/reimbursement.aspx


Australian Government policy and law does not apply in NZ




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1542 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 381


  Reply # 1077288 30-Jun-2014 19:58
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
MadEngineer: Why should you get paid more?

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/R/reimbursement.aspx


Australian Government policy and law does not apply in NZ
hence why I deleted the post as I thought I was looking at the kiwi .govt site. Took you a while to submit your reply! :p

12594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5908

Trusted

  Reply # 1077292 30-Jun-2014 20:06
Send private message

MadEngineer:
KiwiNZ:
MadEngineer: Why should you get paid more?

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/R/reimbursement.aspx


Australian Government policy and law does not apply in NZ
hence why I deleted the post as I thought I was looking at the kiwi .govt site. Took you a while to submit your reply! :p


Just saw that, yep I am a slow typing one handed




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


170 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 22


  Reply # 1077320 30-Jun-2014 20:27
Send private message

I think courts should begin implying an agreement to pay your normal wage when selected for jury service into employment contracts. Or more people should bargain to put them in their own contracts. Or unions on their behalf.

2978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 453

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1077326 30-Jun-2014 20:42
One person supports this post
Send private message

MadEngineer:
KiwiNZ:
MadEngineer: Why should you get paid more?

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/R/reimbursement.aspx


Australian Government policy and law does not apply in NZ
hence why I deleted the post as I thought I was looking at the kiwi .govt site. Took you a while to submit your reply! :p


For what it's worth, you'll note that the government of Australia requires that employers continue to pay you, and do not fire you/make you redundant while you are on jury service.  New Zealand law does not require your employer to.  That's my point.  If it's your "civic duty" to attend jury service, it should be up to the government to ensure that you should be no worse off than if you didn't.  Either the government pays you the amount you'd otherwise be paid, or it should be your employer's "civic duty" to pay you while you're on jury service.  You'll note though that the Australian government actually even pays "average of the last 12 months" to self-employed people who are called to jury service, and pays vastly less to unemployed people than the NZ government does.

And no, KiwiNZ, it's not an exaggeration.  I personally know someone who got tied up in a 6 month jury trial.  If our employer at the time hadn't continued to pay him as if he was still working, that would have been financially devastating.  Potentially even bankruptcy inducing if he had a mortgage.

KiwiNZ: To those who have posted that you feel the payment for Jury service is too low are you willing to pay increased taxes to fund such an increase?


Nope, not at all.  If the Australian government can afford to pay average daily wage to jurors, then so can the NZ government.  And while their income tax is a bit higher than ours, their GST (the real income earner for the government) is 5% lower.  Maybe NZ needs to introduce CGT?

12594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5908

Trusted

  Reply # 1077330 30-Jun-2014 20:49
Send private message

Kyanar:
MadEngineer:
KiwiNZ:
MadEngineer: Why should you get paid more?

http://www.courts.dotag.wa.gov.au/R/reimbursement.aspx


Australian Government policy and law does not apply in NZ
hence why I deleted the post as I thought I was looking at the kiwi .govt site. Took you a while to submit your reply! :p


For what it's worth, you'll note that the government of Australia requires that employers continue to pay you, and do not fire you/make you redundant while you are on jury service.  New Zealand law does not require your employer to.  That's my point.  If it's your "civic duty" to attend jury service, it should be up to the government to ensure that you should be no worse off than if you didn't.  Either the government pays you the amount you'd otherwise be paid, or it should be your employer's "civic duty" to pay you while you're on jury service.  You'll note though that the Australian government actually even pays "average of the last 12 months" to self-employed people who are called to jury service, and pays vastly less to unemployed people than the NZ government does.

And no, KiwiNZ, it's not an exaggeration.  I personally know someone who got tied up in a 6 month jury trial.  If our employer at the time hadn't continued to pay him as if he was still working, that would have been financially devastating.  Potentially even bankruptcy inducing if he had a mortgage.

KiwiNZ: To those who have posted that you feel the payment for Jury service is too low are you willing to pay increased taxes to fund such an increase?


Nope, not at all.  If the Australian government can afford to pay average daily wage to jurors, then so can the NZ government.  And while e I looked their income tax is a bit higher than ours, their GST (the real income earner for the government) is 5% lower.  Maybe NZ needs to introduce CGT?


Last time I looked outside this was not Australia.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2978 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 453

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1077347 30-Jun-2014 21:22
4 people support this post
Send private message

KiwiNZ: 

Last time I looked outside this was not Australia.


I am not going to bother wasting my time debating the point with you if you're just going to dismiss every reasonable point that doesn't fit your world view.

2507 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1162


  Reply # 1077384 30-Jun-2014 21:47
3 people support this post
Send private message

Making the employer continue to pay someone on jury service might be tolerable for larger employers, who can average the occasional cost across a large workforce. But it could be crippling for many smaller businesses. A small business with (say) two employees that had to pay full salary for (say) a six month trial, while they weren't working or bringing any money in to the business, could be enough to drive the business under in many cases.

I think payment should be made by the Crown and should be fair - ie a juror shouldn't expect to make on it, but neither should they be seriously out of pocket. Basing it on average earnings (as per IRD declarations) for the last 12 or 24 months, with some allowance for actual reasonable expenses, seems fair. While justice is important, the judges, lawyers and court officers aren't working for charity or minimum wage, why should the jurors be expected to?

14091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1788


  Reply # 1077398 30-Jun-2014 21:58
Send private message

JimmyH: Making the employer continue to pay someone on jury service might be tolerable for larger employers, who can average the occasional cost across a large workforce. But it could be crippling for many smaller businesses. A small business with (say) two employees that had to pay full salary for (say) a six month trial, while they weren't working or bringing any money in to the business, could be enough to drive the business under in many cases.

I think payment should be made by the Crown and should be fair - ie a juror shouldn't expect to make on it, but neither should they be seriously out of pocket. Basing it on average earnings (as per IRD declarations) for the last 12 or 24 months, with some allowance for actual reasonable expenses, seems fair. While justice is important, the judges, lawyers and court officers aren't working for charity or minimum wage, why should the jurors be expected to?


So true. Perhaps because NZ is largely made up of small businesses, could be why we haven't followed Australia. But the government do often use Australia as an example for bringing in certain changes. When I heard jury service being discussed on the radio, I recall them saying that NZ courts are so far behind due to the lack of jurors to serve. One reason is because people can't afford to serve, so they ask to be excused. But if there was no financial burden, then more people would carry out their civic duty. That certainly seems logical, but not sure who actually makes these decisions so they follow logic.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.