Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
15312 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4035

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097898 29-Jul-2014 14:09
Send private message

ajobbins: Cutting into the front of the screening queue wouldn't have been hard for him, and screening takes literally 30 seconds or less. I doubt 30 seconds would make the difference. If gate staff were willing to let him in a side door, I am sure they would also have been willing to hold the plane another 30 seconds.


Imagine the stink if a politician cut in front of the regular people. In NZ, this would be front page news for a week! They should just allow specifically vetted people to go through the crew (or otherwise designated VIP) check in lanes. Again much cheaper than doing what should already be done, which is to have our PM and his leadership people have use of a plane.

15312 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4035

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097900 29-Jul-2014 14:12
Send private message

DonGould:
networkn: As far as I see it, if he was allowed through by a member of security or staff, it is them who have a case to answer not him. 


Sorry but I find that unreasonable.

Mr Brownlee is effectively the boss of your orginisation. 

It was a question that the boss should not have asked. 

From an employment point of view, he asked a staff member to engage in an illegal act on behalf of the company.




Where is it legislated he is their boss ?

 
 
 
 


3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1097902 29-Jul-2014 14:14
Send private message

networkn:
DonGould:
networkn: As far as I see it, if he was allowed through by a member of security or staff, it is them who have a case to answer not him. 


Sorry but I find that unreasonable.

Mr Brownlee is effectively the boss of your orginisation. 

It was a question that the boss should not have asked. 

From an employment point of view, he asked a staff member to engage in an illegal act on behalf of the company.




Where is it legislated he is their boss ?


really?




Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


15312 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4035

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097911 29-Jul-2014 14:29
Send private message

DonGould:
networkn:
DonGould:
networkn: As far as I see it, if he was allowed through by a member of security or staff, it is them who have a case to answer not him. 


Sorry but I find that unreasonable.

Mr Brownlee is effectively the boss of your orginisation. 

It was a question that the boss should not have asked. 

From an employment point of view, he asked a staff member to engage in an illegal act on behalf of the company.




Where is it legislated he is their boss ?


really?


Yes really. He is not their direct employer as far as I understand it. Based on that your analogy is flawed. 




Mad Scientist
17728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2172

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097912 29-Jul-2014 14:31
Send private message

Let's not jump into too many conclusions

Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1097922 29-Jul-2014 14:56
Send private message

networkn:
ajobbins: Cutting into the front of the screening queue wouldn't have been hard for him, and screening takes literally 30 seconds or less. I doubt 30 seconds would make the difference. If gate staff were willing to let him in a side door, I am sure they would also have been willing to hold the plane another 30 seconds.


Imagine the stink if a politician cut in front of the regular people. In NZ, this would be front page news for a week! They should just allow specifically vetted people to go through the crew (or otherwise designated VIP) check in lanes. Again much cheaper than doing what should already be done, which is to have our PM and his leadership people have use of a plane.


I hear you, but they got that front page for a week news anyway, for a worse reason. While he really should have just been on time, if it was skip the line or break AvSec protocols and skip screening altogether, he should have gone for the line cut. Would have got him on the plane just as fast will less fallout.

Ministers are busy people, and I would be OK with the odd minister skipping to the front of the security queue if need be. Would cost the tax payer more for them to miss the flight.




Twitter: ajobbins


3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1097945 29-Jul-2014 15:47
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:  Yes really. He is not their direct employer as far as I understand it. Based on that your analogy is flawed. 



With all due respect, I find your comment very naive and immature.

Mr Brownlee has influence at many levels that could well impact on many staff.

If he asked, I would let him past too.  You would be a fool not to.

The issue here is that this is a question he simply should not have asked.






Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1097946 29-Jul-2014 15:49
Send private message

ajobbins:  Ministers are busy people, and I would be OK with the odd minister skipping to the front of the security queue if need be. Would cost the tax payer more for them to miss the flight.


I am a busy person too most days.

However I agree with you AJ.  I wouldn't have so much issue with his cutting to the front of the screening queue.  As far as I'm aware it's not breaking the law to queue jump at an airport.

The issue here is that he asked the staff to break the law.




Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


11505 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5211

Trusted

  Reply # 1097948 29-Jul-2014 15:54
Send private message

A Minister does not have direct or even dotted line employment involvement with staff in entities  that his /her portfolio is responsible. That is the responsibility of entity management to CEO/ Secretary level with ultimate oversight by the State Services Commission.

However it would be a brave person who openly refused their Minister.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 228


  Reply # 1097967 29-Jul-2014 16:12
Send private message

DonGould: I wouldn't have so much issue with his cutting to the front of the screening queue.  As far as I'm aware it's not breaking the law to queue jump at an airport.



You could argue that as he is boarding the plane currently at the gate it's not even queue jumping. The queue is for other planes.

3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1098014 29-Jul-2014 17:13
Send private message

KiwiNZ: A Minister does not have direct or even dotted line employment involvement with staff in entities  that his /her portfolio is responsible. That is the responsibility of entity management to CEO/ Secretary level with ultimate oversight by the State Services Commission.

However it would be a brave person who openly refused their Minister.


Agreed.  It would be a very stupid person.




Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1098020 29-Jul-2014 17:18
One person supports this post
Send private message

Bung:
DonGould: I wouldn't have so much issue with his cutting to the front of the screening queue.  As far as I'm aware it's not breaking the law to queue jump at an airport.



You could argue that as he is boarding the plane currently at the gate it's not even queue jumping. The queue is for other planes.


We could argue all sorts of things.

Personally I want to think we live in a country where everyone has equal rights when it comes to government services and that we resource services in a meaningful way.

This is exactly the sort of thing that I was brought up to believe is not New Zealand.

...perhaps it's me that's being naive and immature.  I will accept that suggestion if others want to make it.






Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


777 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 346

Subscriber

  Reply # 1098066 29-Jul-2014 18:11
Send private message

DonGould:
networkn:  Yes really. He is not their direct employer as far as I understand it. Based on that your analogy is flawed. 



With all due respect, I find your comment very naive and immature.

Mr Brownlee has influence at many levels that could well impact on many staff.

If he asked, I would let him past too.  You would be a fool not to.

The issue here is that this is a question he simply should not have asked.




Thats like saying the minister for police should not get traffic tickets for speeding.



gzt

9257 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1318


  Reply # 1098099 29-Jul-2014 18:54
Send private message

networkn:
ajobbins: Cutting into the front of the screening queue wouldn't have been hard for him, and screening takes literally 30 seconds or less. I doubt 30 seconds would make the difference. If gate staff were willing to let him in a side door, I am sure they would also have been willing to hold the plane another 30 seconds.


Imagine the stink if a politician cut in front of the regular people. In NZ, this would be front page news for a week! They should just allow specifically vetted people to go through the crew (or otherwise designated VIP) check in lanes. Again much cheaper than doing what should already be done, which is to have our PM and his leadership people have use of a plane.

In USA some politicos are allowed to do this if they are traveling with a personal security detail authorised to make these preflight safety checks on behalf of airline security.

The situation with Brownlee is different. He entirely skipped these safety checks thereby 'potentially' putting other passengers in danger. This is unacceptable behavior from any minister but particularly an aviation minister. That is the real situation that occurred. I don't have a strong view on resignation as a minister entirely that seems like overkill, but I think maintaining the integrity of the office and the confidence of the public demands that he drop the aviation portfolio permanently. He's still got plenty more anyway. I'd guess Key will take it off him assign it to someone else after the election is over anyway for exactly this reason.

I would not support a US style different rules for politicians. If they are going to make rules they can follow them like the rest of us.

3886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  Reply # 1098103 29-Jul-2014 18:59
Send private message

sir1963:
DonGould:
networkn:  Yes really. He is not their direct employer as far as I understand it. Based on that your analogy is flawed. 



With all due respect, I find your comment very naive and immature.

Mr Brownlee has influence at many levels that could well impact on many staff.

If he asked, I would let him past too.  You would be a fool not to.

The issue here is that this is a question he simply should not have asked.




Thats like saying the minister for police should not get traffic tickets for speeding.




Correct.   If the minster for police asks an officer not to give him a ticket then that officer should likely consider doing just what these guys did, let the minster move on and then take the issue up with their boss.

As with this issue, the minster for police should not ask not to be given the ticket.  The minister should take the ticket and pay it like everyone else!





Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.