Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
2862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097393 28-Jul-2014 19:51
Send private message

Mark:
timbosan:
wasabi2k: that is actually awesome. I used to bike in from Massey - .


I couldn't agree more - I used to cycle in from Ranui,!



Lot of past tense there ... I wonder what the stats really are for cyclists using the cycleway ?



your anti cycling stance is well known Mark but given the rate payers are funding this what does it matter as all ratepayers need catered for not just motorists.




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




2862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097404 28-Jul-2014 19:55
Send private message

networkn:
Mark: It's a new cyclepath going in .. for all those thou..hun...doz... ummm ... "the" cyclist, that goes along that road.



LOL Love it. I always think you'd have to be near suicidal to cycle in Auckland, let alone during Winter in the rain. 


Not at all its quite safe and apart from the minority of idiots that cycle/walk drive its a nice safe city to bike around compared to most.




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




1359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 344


  Reply # 1097462 28-Jul-2014 20:47
Send private message

jeffnz:

your anti cycling stance is well known Mark but given the rate payers are funding this what does it matter as all ratepayers need catered for not just motorists.


Oh I'm not anti cycling, I'm anti stupid people and stupid ideas.  
To me fouling up and complicating already busy intersections to allow a few dozen cyclists a day to have a dedicated lane is a dull idea .. A better idea might be putting the money into providing better education for young people so they grow into old cyclists/drivers/pedestrians who know the road rules.




2862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097486 28-Jul-2014 21:18
2 people support this post
Send private message

Mark:
jeffnz:

your anti cycling stance is well known Mark but given the rate payers are funding this what does it matter as all ratepayers need catered for not just motorists.


Oh I'm not anti cycling, I'm anti stupid people and stupid ideas.  
To me fouling up and complicating already busy intersections to allow a few dozen cyclists a day to have a dedicated lane is a dull idea .. A better idea might be putting the money into providing better education for young people so they grow into old cyclists/drivers/pedestrians who know the road rules.





too much irony in that for me sealed




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




1680 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 798


  Reply # 1097614 29-Jul-2014 07:28
Send private message

jeffnz:
Mark:
jeffnz:

your anti cycling stance is well known Mark but given the rate payers are funding this what does it matter as all ratepayers need catered for not just motorists.


Oh I'm not anti cycling, I'm anti stupid people and stupid ideas.  
To me fouling up and complicating already busy intersections to allow a few dozen cyclists a day to have a dedicated lane is a dull idea .. A better idea might be putting the money into providing better education for young people so they grow into old cyclists/drivers/pedestrians who know the road rules.





too much irony in that for me sealed


Where's Peter Reader and his 'Here we go..." when we need him?wink




Most of the trouble in the world is caused by people wanting to be important. (T.S. Eliot)


1359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 344


  Reply # 1097668 29-Jul-2014 09:06
Send private message

jeffnz: [

too much irony in that for me sealed


Eh ?

3177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 901

Trusted

  Reply # 1097752 29-Jul-2014 10:48
One person supports this post
Send private message

Mark:
jeffnz: [

too much irony in that for me sealed


Eh ?


"I'm not anti cycling[, but roads shouldn't be improved for cyclists.]"

1359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 344


  Reply # 1097917 29-Jul-2014 14:39
Send private message

sidefx:
Mark:
jeffnz: [

too much irony in that for me sealed


Eh ?


"I'm not anti cycling[, but roads shouldn't be improved for cyclists.]"


But that's not what I said.

My gripe is that lots of money gets spent on putting in cycleways (which limits that moneys use to the few people on them .. if they use them at all) when it could be better spent on educating people on how to actually ride on the existing roads (so they know to actually obey traffic lights, stop signs, zebra crossing, one way streets, how to indicate intentions etc).
 
I also feel there are a lot of stupid cyclists out there who get themselves into an avoidable accident and blame usually gets pointed at the drivers of motorvehicles first. 




17950 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5171

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097920 29-Jul-2014 14:49
Send private message

Mark:
sidefx:
Mark:
jeffnz: [

too much irony in that for me sealed


Eh ?


"I'm not anti cycling[, but roads shouldn't be improved for cyclists.]"


But that's not what I said.

My gripe is that lots of money gets spent on putting in cycleways (which limits that moneys use to the few people on them .. if they use them at all) when it could be better spent on educating people on how to actually ride on the existing roads (so they know to actually obey traffic lights, stop signs, zebra crossing, one way streets, how to indicate intentions etc).
 
I also feel there are a lot of stupid cyclists out there who get themselves into an avoidable accident and blame usually gets pointed at the drivers of motorvehicles first. 



I saw a cyclist ride through a completely red light yesterday in the rain on dominion road. 

3177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 901

Trusted

  Reply # 1097921 29-Jul-2014 14:55
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn: 
I saw a cyclist ride through a completely red light yesterday in the rain on dominion road. 


I see motorists doing illegal and stupid things all the time too...  Perhaps no more improvements should be made to roads for cars as the money would be better spent on education?



17950 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5171

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097931 29-Jul-2014 15:13
Send private message

sidefx:
networkn: 
I saw a cyclist ride through a completely red light yesterday in the rain on dominion road. 


I see motorists doing illegal and stupid things all the time too...  Perhaps no more improvements should be made to roads for cars as the money would be better spent on education?


/me sighs.

Potential physical consequences for a mistake in a car are much less serious in most cases if you make a mistake in a car and end up being on the receiving end of an impact. Doesn't really matter if you are in the right if you are dead!


751 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 179


  Reply # 1097940 29-Jul-2014 15:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:
sidefx:
networkn: 
I saw a cyclist ride through a completely red light yesterday in the rain on dominion road. 


I see motorists doing illegal and stupid things all the time too...  Perhaps no more improvements should be made to roads for cars as the money would be better spent on education?


/me sighs.

Potential physical consequences for a mistake in a car are much less serious in most cases if you make a mistake in a car and end up being on the receiving end of an impact. Doesn't really matter if you are in the right if you are dead!



Mistakes are much less serious for the driver but they are for everyone else.

Where as mistakes by a cyclist are likely to only seriously hurt the cyclist

2862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 683

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1097943 29-Jul-2014 15:44
2 people support this post
Send private message

and to sum up, cyclists are legally entitled to use the road and have to obey the road rules as do pedestrians and motorists. Also cycle ways are needed to ensure the separation of cars and bikes to ensure safety of both,

It would be hard pushed for anybody to state that cyclists are responsible for more accidents than cars in fact ACC figures on car v cyclist accidents would say the other so maybe focus on educating all road users on its use with an emphasis on motorists knowing that they drive a potentially lethal machine.

To be honest the car v bike argument is just silly as we go tribal and neither party wins just accept that neither party has exclusive right of way and to share with care.

At least we haven't had the usual ignorant rant of not paying there way so that's a plus.
 




Galaxy S8

 

Garmin  Vivoactive 3




3177 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 901

Trusted

  Reply # 1097963 29-Jul-2014 16:10
Send private message

Yeah sorry I know this argument has been thrashed to death in many other threads, it still boggles my mind that the same arguments are used again and again. Thanks jeffnz, voice of reason. /end posting

1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.