Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
3290 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 538

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120735 2-Sep-2014 18:53
Send private message

Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

17117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120737 2-Sep-2014 18:54
Send private message

Dingbatt:
Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?


Poor suckers paying PAYE? Say what notw You mean contributing members of society?

2877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 698


  Reply # 1120742 2-Sep-2014 19:09
One person supports this post
Send private message

Dingbatt: The fact that welfare makes up a third of the budget and that I do know what benefit (no pun intended) I get from my tax dollars was the main point.


"New Zealand Superannuation accounts for over half this spending and the costs of Superannuation are expected to grow by $600 million each year for the whole forecast period and beyond. Nearly half (45%) of all new spending will be to meet growth in Superannuation costs."

Source: http://www.cpag.org.nz/assets/Budget/130517%20CPAG%202013%20Budget%20Review%20final.pdf

... So, let's get real - over half the welfare budget goes on those over 65 - and much of this because politicians are too weak to do what needs to happen - both raising the age of entitlement to NZS and, most importantly, remove universal entitlement. 

I have a relative who's sitting on a pretty penny or two, yet is so proud to be a welfare recipient - ie in receipt of NZ Superannuation. Yet she'd be one who'd be quite happy to bleat about others 'misusing' the social welfare system.

How fair is it that everyone - just because of age - is entitled to NZS, when so many clearly don't require it, and when we do have actual poverty in this country? (despite what many of you may claim...) 

2482 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1139


  Reply # 1120758 2-Sep-2014 19:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

NZCrusader: 


The lefties can abuse or cry foul all they like at my statement, but at the end of the day I believe I should have the right to voice some input, as to where my tax dollars go.


You do. In fact you have several options.

The low effort option is to read the party manifestos and the mix of tax and spending proposals they put forward, then vote for the party with the package that best suits you.

Requiring more effort, as a member of the public you also have the right to make submissions on bills you don't like.

If that's not granular enough for you, then like every other citizen you have the right to stand for election. Convince enough people that you are right and you get into Parliament where you can vote on spending bills and go through them line by line in committee.

Prove competent and get into Cabinet and you have even more influence.

3290 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 538

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120761 2-Sep-2014 19:15
Send private message

networkn:
Dingbatt:
Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?


Poor suckers paying PAYE? Say what notw You mean contributing members of society?


Yup. Me included. Nowhere to hide, I just wish others had nowhere to hide as well.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

2482 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1139


  Reply # 1120766 2-Sep-2014 19:20
Send private message

BarTender:

If only the right-wing posters here would approach tax dodging / avoidance companies (how much tax did Google, Amazon, Microsoft... pay??) as those are the groups who by far and above fleece the country far more so than any dodgy parent on the dole.  Wasn't the conservative figure something like 4 billion??


I don't know about Microsoft or Google, but I thought Amazon as a whole was barely profitable - so it stands to reason that their tax bill was small.

I would be surprised if Microsoft and Google were dodging $4 billion of taxes in NZ, it just doesn't sound plausible. However, if they are not paying much tax then that still doesn't mean they are fleecing anyone if they are complying with the letter of the tax law and paying what they owe. If the tax law has avenues that let them inappropriately reduce tax then blame the politicians that enact the buggy law, not the companies who are merely complying with it.

17117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120794 2-Sep-2014 19:57
2 people support this post
Send private message

 

How fair is it that everyone - just because of age - is entitled to NZS, when so many clearly don't require it, and when we do have actual poverty in this country? (despite what many of you may claim...) 


Well I feel it should be asset tested, however those who are wealthy enough to not require it, likely educated themselves, worked hard and made good decisions. Strictly speaking they should be MORE entitled to it than anyone due to having contributed more heavily to the tax pool.

11268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3591

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1120853 2-Sep-2014 21:55
Send private message

Dingbatt:
Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?


No one I hope - that is what Dignitas is for!!





11268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3591

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1120855 2-Sep-2014 21:57
Send private message

networkn:
 

How fair is it that everyone - just because of age - is entitled to NZS, when so many clearly don't require it, and when we do have actual poverty in this country? (despite what many of you may claim...) 


Well I feel it should be asset tested, however those who are wealthy enough to not require it, likely educated themselves, worked hard and made good decisions. Strictly speaking they should be MORE entitled to it than anyone due to having contributed more heavily to the tax pool.


It does not matter whether they require it or not - they paid for it.

I have to pay to educate children I don't have (for example), so I'm bu****ed if I'd be happy to lose my pension too.





4955 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1318

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 1120858 2-Sep-2014 21:59
One person supports this post
Send private message

Last time I checked at family planning 100 condoms were $5 so basically free. If you can't afford children don't have them.

Certainly don't have 11 of them while on the dole like the lady on the TV news the other night complaining that she has no money and the govt doesn't support her.

11268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3591

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1120863 2-Sep-2014 22:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

Dingbatt:
networkn:
Dingbatt:
Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?


Poor suckers paying PAYE? Say what notw You mean contributing members of society?


Yup. Me included. Nowhere to hide, I just wish others had nowhere to hide as well.


I don't pay PAYE and neither does my wife.

If you think we have somewhere to hide, I will send you our Provisional Tax bill from the IRD - based on the assumption that we will increase our turnover by 5% and with 8.4% penalty interest if we underpay - and a mere 1.75% credit interest if we overpay...it's payable in a lump sum every few months. At the end of your first year in business, the IRD will demand terminal tax (the full amount of income tax for the year just ended, in a single lump) PLUS you will begin paying Provisional tax for the year just begun.

Note that you pay the IRD what they tell you you must pay - and if they get it wrong and you make too much money, and hence pay too little Provisional Tax, they will stiff you for 8.4% interest on the underpayment to reward your hard work and effort....

PAYE people have it easy, I can tell you. Running your own business most assuredly does NOT mean you are not a contributing member of society - in fact it means you do a lot of unpaid work for the IRD in addition to paying through the nose.





17117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120864 2-Sep-2014 22:15
Send private message

Geektastic:
Dingbatt:
networkn:
Dingbatt:
Geektastic: Corporates pay what they are required to pay. The assumption that we are somehow entitled to expect more of what they earn in the name of 'fairness' just seems wooly headed.

If the Chinese can restrict the number of offspring breeders produce, why can't we?


I concede 'fair' wasn't the correct term to use. And corporates are only one group that use loopholes to reduce their tax burden. It is we poor suckers that pay PAYE that have nowhere to hide. The problem is both the law and the enforcement of it that lets the 4 Billion referenced by BarTender go missing.

As for the chinese, we don't operate that sort of political or societal system. It's just as easy for people with children to look down their nose at childless people as the reverse. Without other people's children who is going to change your adult diaper and wipe the drool off your chin in the old folks home?


Poor suckers paying PAYE? Say what notw You mean contributing members of society?


Yup. Me included. Nowhere to hide, I just wish others had nowhere to hide as well.


I don't pay PAYE and neither does my wife.

If you think we have somewhere to hide, I will send you our Provisional Tax bill from the IRD - based on the assumption that we will increase our turnover by 5% and with 8.4% penalty interest if we underpay - and a mere 1.75% credit interest if we overpay...it's payable in a lump sum every few months. At the end of your first year in business, the IRD will demand terminal tax (the full amount of income tax for the year just ended, in a single lump) PLUS you will begin paying Provisional tax for the year just begun.

PAYE people have it easy, I can tell you. Running your own business most assuredly does NOT mean you are not a contributing member of society - in fact it means you do a lot of unpaid work for the IRD in addition to paying through the nose.


HAHA ain't that the truth! 

11268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3591

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1120865 2-Sep-2014 22:17
Send private message

nathan: Last time I checked at family planning 100 condoms were $5 so basically free. If you can't afford children don't have them.

Certainly don't have 11 of them while on the dole like the lady on the TV news the other night complaining that she has no money and the govt doesn't support her.


I'll certainly consent to my tax dollars funding sterilisation after 2 children...





581 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 193


  Reply # 1120866 2-Sep-2014 22:21
2 people support this post
Send private message

the point of view that says "we don't have real poverty / go see the 3rd world" - really misses the KEY point imo

this point being we are talking about KIDS

kids who didn't choose their life

kids who go hungry / kids who lack for basic care / kids more likely to get poor education outcomes and feature in all the wrong kind of stats

KIDS who in my opinion deserve our support irrespective of the parents situation or decisions

its called empathy

and its morally right imo

why do so many posters seem to not care about this?

are you really that heartless?


as a more general comment:

i dunno about you but i am getting tired of the same few spouting the same theme ie. it's a left wing smear campaign / judith did nothing wrong / the poor deserve what they (don't) get / put em in jail / shoot the commies etc etc

and i think it's real sad for a forum board that until more recently managed to maintain some sense of respect for opposing views, without everything turning into an us and them thing...

why cant we all just get along?  :)

righto!!


peace love and mung beans all :)


17117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1120878 2-Sep-2014 22:39
One person supports this post
Send private message

driller2000: the point of view that says "we don't have real poverty / go see the 3rd world" - really misses the KEY point imo

this point being we are talking about KIDS

kids who didn't choose their life

kids who go hungry / kids who lack for basic care / kids more likely to get poor education outcomes and feature in all the wrong kind of stats

KIDS who in my opinion deserve our support irrespective of the parents situation or decisions

its called empathy

and its morally right imo

why do so many posters seem to not care about this?

are you really that heartless?


as a more general comment:

i dunno about you but i am getting tired of the same few spouting the same theme ie. it's a left wing smear campaign / judith did nothing wrong / the poor deserve what they (don't) get / put em in jail / shoot the commies etc etc

and i think it's real sad for a forum board that until more recently managed to maintain some sense of respect for opposing views, without everything turning into an us and them thing...

why cant we all just get along?  :)

righto!!


peace love and mung beans all :)



Please quote posts where it's suggested that we leave kids starving, homeless, or alone? I haven't seen a single one.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.