Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 
2439 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1097


  Reply # 1147418 4-Oct-2014 22:40
Send private message

I'm just happy that peace and quiet has returned for a couple of years. The robocalls, cold-calling by parties promoting candidates, junk mail saturation bombing, and forests of billboards sprouting on every patch of bare land are hopefully over and done with for another three years.

Mad Scientist
18116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2269

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147420 4-Oct-2014 22:43
Send private message

Three years is too short I reckon. Maybe four or even five years?

 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software
3206 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 507

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147529 5-Oct-2014 10:06
Send private message

I wonder whether a more pure form of democracy, where the percentage of the party vote you get determines your say in Parliament. No coat-tailing, no overhang, just add percentages to get a majority. So for instance, the United Future or ACT only get 0.7% of the say, Conservatives 3.8%, and more importantly National get just short of 48% of the say. No wasted vote and everyone's vote is of equal value ( independent of what electorate you are enrolled in). There would need to be a cutoff to stop someone registering, voting for themselves and wasting time in Parliament with 0.00003% of the vote. Perhaps along the lines of what is needed to register as a political party in the first place. I know no system is perfect but at least there wouldn't be any gaming of the system like there is at the moment.
Downsides; NORML (or what ever they call themselves these days) or a joke party might hold the balance of power.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

Mad Scientist
18116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2269

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147530 5-Oct-2014 10:09
Send private message

The easier fix for the issue you described would be to lower the threshold, but also risking a joke party with lots of money getting thru ...

3206 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 507

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147545 5-Oct-2014 11:04
Send private message

joker97: The easier fix for the issue you described would be to lower the threshold, but also risking a joke party with lots of money getting thru ...


Yes I had considered it in terms of threshold, but that still leads to wasted votes. The almost 4% that voted Conservative may have had reasons to not vote National, but half of those vote were distributed to National anyhow. The threshold would need to be at the level equivalent to 1 MP.
The way I would see it working is if you get more electorate MPs than your party vote would entitle you to, you still only get the party vote percentage in voting rights in Parliament. So no overhang, but people can still be represented by their local mp. The 'pureness' of the democracy would not be affected by coattailing, overhang or strategic voting, all of which leave a bitter taste in portions of the electorate.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

Mad Scientist
18116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2269

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147579 5-Oct-2014 13:44
Send private message

i guess there needs to be a counter balance between "wasted votes" and "jokers trying it out" getting into parliament.

it's like saying if you want to swim 100m you can be at the olympics, well, you need to swim within the time limit to qualify, no exceptions.

2435 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 652


  Reply # 1147716 5-Oct-2014 17:41
Send private message

joker97: i guess there needs to be a counter balance between "wasted votes" and "jokers trying it out" getting into parliament.

it's like saying if you want to swim 100m you can be at the olympics, well, you need to swim within the time limit to qualify, no exceptions.


Good point, but the fact that hundreds of thousands voted for conservative (4.2% AFAIK?) and were 'wasted' votes means something should change.

I actually like the prior post of %=1MP. As the entry level. If you get 1/164th (?) of the boy you SHOULD get 1/164th o the representation?

Mad Scientist
18116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2269

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1147724 5-Oct-2014 17:56
Send private message

Well not really.

If the boy next door went to med school and get 10% you won't want to see him where he is allowed to treat 10% of conditions. Otherwise we'd have everyone starting their own party to get into parliament!

1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 1147762 5-Oct-2014 18:26
Send private message

Dingbatt: I wonder whether a more pure form of democracy, where the percentage of the party vote you get determines your say in Parliament. No coat-tailing, no overhang, just add percentages to get a majority. So for instance, the United Future or ACT only get 0.7% of the say, Conservatives 3.8%, and more importantly National get just short of 48% of the say. No wasted vote and everyone's vote is of equal value ( independent of what electorate you are enrolled in). There would need to be a cutoff to stop someone registering, voting for themselves and wasting time in Parliament with 0.00003% of the vote. Perhaps along the lines of what is needed to register as a political party in the first place. I know no system is perfect but at least there wouldn't be any gaming of the system like there is at the moment.
Downsides; NORML (or what ever they call themselves these days) or a joke party might hold the balance of power.

Only if you make it proprtional for everone on the roll....
Meaning if 40% of enrolled voters don't vote then 40% of seats in the house have no bums on them.... and there would be empty space representing invalid votes too.

Its the only way to truely cater for everyone. And as ludicrous as having representation based on % of votes without thresholds

gzt



9586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1402


  Reply # 1148186 6-Oct-2014 13:00
Send private message

Mr Key on the loss of a seat at the last minute: "I guess it makes you work that little bit harder, which is no bad thing. It's just odd actually more than anything, because it's a very, very complex mathematical formula, but the advice that we had was that it was pretty unlikely we would lose one [seat] because we got the 119th seat and not the 120th, but effectively what happened was the special's [votes] were so massively skewed against us. It just seems odd - we got about 48 per cent of the vote across the country."

Personally I don't find it odd. I think it is more likely advance voting favored National disproportionately.

Plus - special voting outside the country has usually favored the left parties especially Green.

Also I expect those overseas are less swayed by the daily political ups and downs inside the country. Therefore special voters have been less affected by the swing to National (and the high number who did not vote on the party list) therefore making the left/right differential greater than usual.

Facepalm! You can expect to see Crosby/Textor and Mr Key develop high level strategy to address that omission next time around ; ).

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon launches the International Shopping Experience in the Amazon Shopping App
Posted 19-Apr-2018 08:38


Spark New Zealand and TVNZ to bring coverage of Rugby World Cup 2019
Posted 16-Apr-2018 06:55


How Google can seize Microsoft Office crown
Posted 14-Apr-2018 11:08


How back office transformation drives IRD efficiency
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:15


iPod laws in a smartphone world: will we ever get copyright right?
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:13


Lightbox service using big data and analytics to learn more about customers
Posted 9-Apr-2018 12:11


111 mobile caller location extended to iOS
Posted 6-Apr-2018 13:50


Huawei announces the HUAWEI P20 series
Posted 29-Mar-2018 11:41


Symantec Internet Security Threat Report shows increased endpoint technology risks
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:29


Spark switches on long-range IoT network across New Zealand
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:22


Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18


Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47


Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25


New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48


Shipments tumble as NZ phone upgrades slow
Posted 2-Mar-2018 11:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.