Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
659 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 1219831 22-Jan-2015 10:01
Send private message

networkn:
he past, but getting your foot in the door can be difficult.

I do think that perhaps sometimes people look at the house they want, and say "I can never afford that"; instead of working out what they CAN afford and looking at that section of the market. It is still very difficult though.




I agree with this part of your statement. People today want lots of bedrooms, usually big houses in nice "safe" areas. When I looked at the house my wifes parents lived in when they first got married, I couldn't imagine anyone buying a place like that and actually living in it today, but they attribute it as the first step in 
the building of their current wealth profile.



You don't even need to go back that far.

My first home back in early 2000, was a 145 square meter house 3 bedroom on 650 sqm in Cambridge East right on the greenbelt. $116,000. About $10,000 into renovations (new carpet, paint, polished floors, bathroom, landscaping, deck) and it returned $245,000 in 2005.

All I did was stick a homemade sign out the front, and had it signed and sold 2 weeks later.

Neither my partner or me were on stunning incomes. $25K and 34K = $59K combined.

I cant understand why more people my age arent in an equivalent or better position becuase there were plenty of opportunities like that available back in 2000 when you had 0% deposits + good house supply in desirable areas.


Mad Scientist
20904 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1219845 22-Jan-2015 10:14
Send private message

i agree with networkn.

when i was a student i only bought clothes on clearance and only bought food on special.

priorities, needs vs wants




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


 
 
 
 


789 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1220078 22-Jan-2015 13:28
Send private message

I don't have any issue with the 20% deposit, as people mentioned, buying your first house is hard work. What I'd don't like is going to auctions and seeing houses go for $150k more than expected. I can't see why LIM's etc aren't mandatory for the seller to provide and publish.
However I think we'll be avoiding the auction process.

13310 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1220108 22-Jan-2015 14:08
Send private message

mudguard: I don't have any issue with the 20% deposit, as people mentioned, buying your first house is hard work. What I'd don't like is going to auctions and seeing houses go for $150k more than expected. I can't see why LIM's etc aren't mandatory for the seller to provide and publish.
However I think we'll be avoiding the auction process.


Part of the problem is in my view a lack of a proper valuation regime.

In a former life, I was a qualified Chartered Surveyor (the profession that, amongst other things, carries out valuations in the UK).

When a house is sold in the UK, no bank will lend a bean against it until they have had a Chartered Surveyor visit the house and carry out a mortgage survey to ascertain the value and whether it at least appears reasonably sound structurally etc. This means that, every time a house is sold, a proper valuation is done. That is a PROPER valuation - not just a QV software program having a guess.

Many estate agents in the UK (but by no means all) are also Chartered Surveyors. 

The normal way of things is that almost no house will ever go on the market there unless someone has valued it and put a price on it. So if you look at a UK agent's window, it will have the same kind of cards in with photos and brief details but also the price of the house. Now, of course people negotiate and sometimes it goes for less and sometime for more, but it does mean that everyone knows what ballpark to start with.

Houses that are auctioned always have a guide price that is equally sensible.

From conversations with agents here, I learned that it is common practice to dupe potential buyers into attending an auction (and paying for all the due diligence just in case) by telling them that the agent expects the sale to be around $x when he knows full well it is far more likely to be $x + 30%.

Given the vast sums charged here by estate agents the level of skill and professionalism they have is woeful and their business practices often verging on the dodgy I think.





659 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 1220134 22-Jan-2015 14:40
Send private message

Geektastic:
mudguard: I don't have any issue with the 20% deposit, as people mentioned, buying your first house is hard work. What I'd don't like is going to auctions and seeing houses go for $150k more than expected. I can't see why LIM's etc aren't mandatory for the seller to provide and publish.
However I think we'll be avoiding the auction process.


Part of the problem is in my view a lack of a proper valuation regime.

In a former life, I was a qualified Chartered Surveyor (the profession that, amongst other things, carries out valuations in the UK).

When a house is sold in the UK, no bank will lend a bean against it until they have had a Chartered Surveyor visit the house and carry out a mortgage survey to ascertain the value and whether it at least appears reasonably sound structurally etc. This means that, every time a house is sold, a proper valuation is done. That is a PROPER valuation - not just a QV software program having a guess.

Many estate agents in the UK (but by no means all) are also Chartered Surveyors. 

The normal way of things is that almost no house will ever go on the market there unless someone has valued it and put a price on it. So if you look at a UK agent's window, it will have the same kind of cards in with photos and brief details but also the price of the house. Now, of course people negotiate and sometimes it goes for less and sometime for more, but it does mean that everyone knows what ballpark to start with.

Houses that are auctioned always have a guide price that is equally sensible.

From conversations with agents here, I learned that it is common practice to dupe potential buyers into attending an auction (and paying for all the due diligence just in case) by telling them that the agent expects the sale to be around $x when he knows full well it is far more likely to be $x + 30%.

Given the vast sums charged here by estate agents the level of skill and professionalism they have is woeful and their business practices often verging on the dodgy I think.



At the end of the day though people will pay what ever they can afford to live in the place they WANT, that's why prices are so out of control. The true value should be based on 

a) land value set by someone like QV
b) house value set by registered valuer
c) legislation that states a house cannot be sold for more than 20% of the total values above combined

This would always ensure the house would be worth at least what it cost to build \ improve, would also allow wiggle room for marketing factors like school zoning, proximity to amenities etc. Would be interesting to cover scenarios and see how such a model would perform at keeping things realistic.









22510 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1220136 22-Jan-2015 14:42
2 people support this post
Send private message

I don't support any limitations on the price 2 parties agree to sell things for when it is negotiated between them so no thanks to that.




Richard rich.ms

659 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 1220157 22-Jan-2015 15:02
Send private message

richms: I don't support any limitations on the price 2 parties agree to sell things for when it is negotiated between them so no thanks to that.


The current model for housing supports people with the most physical money, or the people who can borrow the most, the only real winners are banks and the rich ...this has got to change.

 
 
 
 


21279 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1220162 22-Jan-2015 15:11
Send private message

Another thing I see stupid money spent on : Weddings and Engagement rings. One youngish guy I know spent 20K on the ring and 30k on the wedding. He was complaining about house prices and I couldn't help but laugh out loud. 

789 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1220242 22-Jan-2015 16:53
Send private message

When I was doing mortgages at Westpac I used to wonder how people on the one hand would love the increase in their GV so they could borrow more, then would complain about their annual rates increasing! I like the solution proposed above, that a valuation is mandatory. I live in a unit in Royal Oak, surrounded by million dollar villas. One of the units is on sale, and has a low GV (for Auckland) of about $470k, so many people have come to see it, and I've been asked questions as I mow the lawn, one woman was shocked when I thought it would go for $650-$700k. For a two bed, one bathroom unit.
I have friends who have attended nearly 40 auctions in the past year, he is amusing, when it exceeds their budget, they walk out. Once as he was walking out the auctioneer called out "sir, the auction hasn't finished yet" to which he retorted, "it has for us". Made me laugh.


2132 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1220269 22-Jan-2015 17:39
Send private message

heylinb4nz:
networkn:
he past, but getting your foot in the door can be difficult.

I do think that perhaps sometimes people look at the house they want, and say "I can never afford that"; instead of working out what they CAN afford and looking at that section of the market. It is still very difficult though.




I agree with this part of your statement. People today want lots of bedrooms, usually big houses in nice "safe" areas. When I looked at the house my wifes parents lived in when they first got married, I couldn't imagine anyone buying a place like that and actually living in it today, but they attribute it as the first step in 
the building of their current wealth profile.



You don't even need to go back that far.

My first home back in early 2000, was a 145 square meter house 3 bedroom on 650 sqm in Cambridge East right on the greenbelt. $116,000. About $10,000 into renovations (new carpet, paint, polished floors, bathroom, landscaping, deck) and it returned $245,000 in 2005.

All I did was stick a homemade sign out the front, and had it signed and sold 2 weeks later.

Neither my partner or me were on stunning incomes. $25K and 34K = $59K combined.

I cant understand why more people my age arent in an equivalent or better position because there were plenty of opportunities like that available back in 2000 when you had 0% deposits + good house supply in desirable areas.



My first house $380k 2004, total renovation 20k, sold 2013 $720k,

so thats' 340k - 20k, $320k profit for doing nothing all tax free over 9 years.

So the house, there's no way I would have bought the same house 9 years later...... so I think there's more going on than people spending all their money of "iphones".

A.

222 posts

Master Geek


  # 1220341 22-Jan-2015 19:52

networkn: Another thing I see stupid money spent on : Weddings and Engagement rings. One youngish guy I know spent 20K on the ring and 30k on the wedding. He was complaining about house prices and I couldn't help but laugh out loud. 


That really is funny.  I hear similar stories all the time.  It's like "high house prices" is just the excuse people need to blow serious cash on cars and holidays because, hey, houses are so expensive so why even try?   

Edit: 20K on a ring is insane.  On the Warehouse website today they have a lovely looking ring for $2400 reduced from $8000!  He should have just gone for that one and use the change to put a deposit on a house in Wanganui.

http://www.thewarehouse.co.nz/red/catalog/product/1-Carat-Diamond-Solitaire-18ct-Gold-Diamond-Ring?SKU=1784413







4377 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1220392 22-Jan-2015 21:17
Send private message

afe66: My first house $380k 2004, total renovation 20k, sold 2013 $720k,

so thats' 340k - 20k, $320k profit for doing nothing all tax free over 9 years.

So the house, there's no way I would have bought the same house 9 years later...... so I think there's more going on than people spending all their money of "iphones".A.


Market related capital gains are a strange beast because people feel good about it, but in reality you only realise the gain if you sell up and don't buy another house. So, in most cases the gain is theoretical rather than real.

That's why I have ignored capital gains when performing my own analysis, however it's still important to factor in the inflation shield that goes along with propery ownership.

Mad Scientist
20904 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1220394 22-Jan-2015 21:20
Send private message

all gains are realised eventually. unless one dies with a pot of gold, but those that are left fighting for the pot are the ones that gain.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


4377 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1220395 22-Jan-2015 21:22
Send private message

joker97: all gains are realised eventually. unless one dies with a pot of gold, but those that are left fighting for the pot are the ones that gain.


If it's not in my lifetime then it doesn't count! ;)

Mad Scientist
20904 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1220398 22-Jan-2015 21:25
Send private message

I would suggest that passive income (collecting rent) is a gain, and so is not paying a cent on mortgage once you own 100% of the house is another form of passive gain




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Logitech introduces new Made for Google keyboard and mouse devices
Posted 16-Oct-2019 13:36


MATTR launches to accelerate decentralised identity
Posted 16-Oct-2019 10:28


Vodafone X-Squad powers up for customers
Posted 16-Oct-2019 08:15


D Link ANZ launches EXO Smart Mesh Wi Fi Routers with McAfee protection
Posted 15-Oct-2019 11:31


Major Japanese retailer partners with smart New Zealand technology IMAGR
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:29


Ola pioneers one-time passcode feature to fight rideshare fraud
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:24


Spark Sport new home of NZC matches from 2020
Posted 10-Oct-2019 09:59


Meet Nola, Noel Leeming's new digital employee
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:07


Registrations for Sprout Accelerator open for 2020 season
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:02


Teletrac Navman welcomes AI tech leader Jens Meggers as new President
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:41


Vodafone makes voice of 4G (VoLTE) official
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:36


2degrees Reaches Milestone of 100,000 Broadband Customers
Posted 1-Oct-2019 09:17


Nokia 1 Plus available in New Zealand from 2nd October
Posted 30-Sep-2019 17:46


Ola integrates Apple Pay as payment method in New Zealand
Posted 25-Sep-2019 09:51


Facebook Portal to land in New Zealand
Posted 19-Sep-2019 18:35



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.