Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
3022 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 808


  Reply # 1373543 25-Aug-2015 09:40
Send private message

MikeB4:
xpd: "Most taxpayers would agree that it's not unreasonable to expect a beneficiary to get the approval first before they order a $3,000 piece of fitness equipment, especially one ordered from late night television," - EXACTLY.

The short time I was on a benefit years ago, I was made to jump through hoops just to get a 2nd hand $150 bed so my back wouldnt fudge out on me from the old one I had. 






It is the "normal process" to assess and decide before the fact, however it does not exclude after the fact decisions given the circumstances. The SSA is not specific in this.



There are plenty of people out there working and really struggling to make ends meet and could never dream to afford such a luxurious machine. 

This is especially an insult to those people . 

Given the high profile of this story, MSD should put up the facts or make the woman return the machine. Too often people hide behind privacy laws to escape consequences of poor choices. 

523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1373545 25-Aug-2015 09:42
Send private message

I think its ridiculous that there is a 'social security appeal authority' for beneficiaries to appeal decisions made by the MSD. Its the first time I have heard about it. 

I bet the social security appeal authority is funded by taxpayers too. And it costs nothing to appeal.

Money should be handed out on approval by a board of taxpayers only. There should be nobody but taxpayers on this board. If the taxpayers don't agree, why should it even get appeal? Its taxpayers money for petes sake.

/rant. 

 
 
 
 


Departed
10046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4206

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1373550 25-Aug-2015 09:48
One person supports this post
Send private message

I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1373552 25-Aug-2015 09:48
Send private message

DizzyD: I think its ridiculous that there is a 'social security appeal authority' for beneficiaries to appeal decisions made by the MSD. Its the first time I have heard about it. 

I bet the social security appeal authority is funded by taxpayers too. And it costs nothing to appeal.

Money should be handed out on approval by a board of taxpayers only. There should be nobody but taxpayers on this board. If the taxpayers don't agree, why should it even get appeal? Its taxpayers money for petes sake.

/rant. 


Independent review by a third party is a pretty common and well regarded practice. - See Police Tribunal etc.

Decisions are not made by the MSD Hive Mind - they are made by individuals or groups - sometimes those decisions may not be appropriate.

Departed
10046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4206

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1373553 25-Aug-2015 09:49
One person supports this post
Send private message

DizzyD: I think its ridiculous that there is a 'social security appeal authority' for beneficiaries to appeal decisions made by the MSD. Its the first time I have heard about it. 

I bet the social security appeal authority is funded by taxpayers too. And it costs nothing to appeal.

Money should be handed out on approval by a board of taxpayers only. There should be nobody but taxpayers on this board. If the taxpayers don't agree, why should it even get appeal? Its taxpayers money for petes sake.

/rant. 


So we will remove the right to appeal IRD decisions? Police decisions, while we are at it lets do away with the three yearly elections oh and Parliamentary select committees.........




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1373554 25-Aug-2015 09:50
Send private message

MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.


Departed
10046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4206

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1373557 25-Aug-2015 09:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

DizzyD:
MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.



Of course it matters people here are making conclusions based of what they have read or listened to in the press.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1373561 25-Aug-2015 09:54
Send private message

MikeB4:
DizzyD: I think its ridiculous that there is a 'social security appeal authority' for beneficiaries to appeal decisions made by the MSD. Its the first time I have heard about it. 

I bet the social security appeal authority is funded by taxpayers too. And it costs nothing to appeal.

Money should be handed out on approval by a board of taxpayers only. There should be nobody but taxpayers on this board. If the taxpayers don't agree, why should it even get appeal? Its taxpayers money for petes sake.

/rant. 


So we will remove the right to appeal IRD decisions? Police decisions, while we are at it lets do away with the three yearly elections oh and Parliamentary select committees.........


Correct me if I am wrong, but the SSAA has nothing to to with IRD or Police decisions. Thats a separate topic. This one is about beneficiaries.

http://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/social-security-appeal-authority/about-the-social-security-appeal-authority

The Social Security Appeal Authority is an independent judicial tribunal that hears appeals made by beneficiaries who want to challenge a decision made about their benefit.


Nothing wrong with a service like this. But I as a taxpayer don't want to have my hard earned tax money being used to challenge a decision by the MSD.

1684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 255

Subscriber

  Reply # 1373562 25-Aug-2015 09:54
Send private message

MikeB4:
xpd: "Most taxpayers would agree that it's not unreasonable to expect a beneficiary to get the approval first before they order a $3,000 piece of fitness equipment, especially one ordered from late night television," - EXACTLY.

The short time I was on a benefit years ago, I was made to jump through hoops just to get a 2nd hand $150 bed so my back wouldnt fudge out on me from the old one I had. 






It is the "normal process" to assess and decide before the fact, however it does not exclude after the fact decisions given the circumstances. The SSA is not specific in this.


The SSA SHOULD BE specific on this. 

It should absolutely forbid the ability to claim after the fact unless given specific permission to do so. 






Handsome Dan Has Spoken.

523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1373563 25-Aug-2015 09:54
Send private message

MikeB4:
DizzyD:
MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.



Of course it matters people here are making conclusions based of what they have read or listened to in the press.


I'm saying that the MSD decision was the right one.



Departed
10046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4206

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1373566 25-Aug-2015 09:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

DizzyD:
MikeB4:
DizzyD:
MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.



Of course it matters people here are making conclusions based of what they have read or listened to in the press.


I'm saying that the MSD decision was the right one.




How do you know that?

The Appeal Authority has ruled differently, that authority is independent, appointed by the Governor General. 




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Departed
10046 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4206

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1373568 25-Aug-2015 10:00
Send private message

Handsomedan:
MikeB4:
xpd: "Most taxpayers would agree that it's not unreasonable to expect a beneficiary to get the approval first before they order a $3,000 piece of fitness equipment, especially one ordered from late night television," - EXACTLY.

The short time I was on a benefit years ago, I was made to jump through hoops just to get a 2nd hand $150 bed so my back wouldnt fudge out on me from the old one I had. 






It is the "normal process" to assess and decide before the fact, however it does not exclude after the fact decisions given the circumstances. The SSA is not specific in this.


The SSA SHOULD BE specific on this. 

It should absolutely forbid the ability to claim after the fact unless given specific permission to do so. 




Yes and no, due to the complexity of what the SSA deals with it is very hard to be black and white in the "discretionary" sections of the act. The qualifications for the primary benefits are definitive.




Mike
IT Management Consultant, Freelance money spender
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


3022 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 808


  Reply # 1373569 25-Aug-2015 10:03
Send private message

MikeB4:
DizzyD:
MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.



Of course it matters people here are making conclusions based of what they have read or listened to in the press.


That is because the privacy act is being used to suppress any reasons so you must expect this. 


523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1373570 25-Aug-2015 10:03
Send private message

MikeB4:
DizzyD:
MikeB4:
DizzyD:
MikeB4: I assume that all those here that are making definitive decisions have read the MSD case notes and the full findings and transcripts of the SS Appeal Authority.


It does not matter. The MSD declined it.



Of course it matters people here are making conclusions based of what they have read or listened to in the press.


I'm saying that the MSD decision was the right one.




How do you know that?

The Appeal Authority has ruled differently, that authority is independent, appointed by the Governor General. 


Thats my opinion.

Taxpayer money should NEVER be used for stuff like this. 
It makes a mockery of our beneficiary system at the expense of us taxpayers.

4761 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1317

Trusted

  Reply # 1373575 25-Aug-2015 10:08
One person supports this post
Send private message

She bought a treadmill off an INFOMERCIAL. What has history taught us about exercising equipment from infomercials...
I hope tax payer money doesnt go towards that rubbish. Winz is better off renting some equipment from a reputable company.






1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Behind Spark’s slow-burn 4.5G plan
Posted 26-Jun-2017 16:23


Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.