Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
2829 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1008


  Reply # 1383480 9-Sep-2015 15:05
One person supports this post
Send private message

A taser seems harsh. Surely stern language followed by a cuddle would have resolved the situation without force.

Dratsab: I can't quite believe the moronity of people, especially a particular 3 News reporter, who seem to think that a taser should have been used - as if it's an appropriate or even effective weapon in an active shooter situation.




Mike

Departed
10563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4589

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1383484 9-Sep-2015 15:12
Send private message

I don't think anyone here can truly judge the situation and the folks involved in this incident.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


jmh

446 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 140

Subscriber

  Reply # 1383510 9-Sep-2015 15:54
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeAqua: These days media simply must 'go live' to someone on location. 

It doesn't matter if they have anyone to talk to who has cogent, relevant or any information.  It doesn't matter if good audio quality is available as long as they go live on location.

Unless said location is a regional town, in which case going live on location to the nearest of Auckland Wellington or Christchurch will suffice.

For a NZ news story it's preferable for the interviewee to be a reporter employed by the same TV network, who knows nothing about the situation, and even less about grammar of spoken English, despite English being their first language.

For an international story any overseas reporter will do as long as English is a second language for them, they have very strong accent, don't know to pause after speaking on an international call, and are using a very poor phone/Skype line.  Overseas reporters do seem to know stuff but that's acceptable as long as listeners can't actually understand what they are saying.


And if it's snowing, or raining a lot, they have to send someone out in it to tell us what snow or rain is like.  While they are there, they ask everyone else what they think of the snow and the rain.

9380 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2829

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1383543 9-Sep-2015 17:21
Send private message

jmh:
MikeAqua: These days media simply must 'go live' to someone on location. 

It doesn't matter if they have anyone to talk to who has cogent, relevant or any information.  It doesn't matter if good audio quality is available as long as they go live on location.

Unless said location is a regional town, in which case going live on location to the nearest of Auckland Wellington or Christchurch will suffice.

For a NZ news story it's preferable for the interviewee to be a reporter employed by the same TV network, who knows nothing about the situation, and even less about grammar of spoken English, despite English being their first language.

For an international story any overseas reporter will do as long as English is a second language for them, they have very strong accent, don't know to pause after speaking on an international call, and are using a very poor phone/Skype line.  Overseas reporters do seem to know stuff but that's acceptable as long as listeners can't actually understand what they are saying.


And if it's snowing, or raining a lot, they have to send someone out in it to tell us what snow or rain is like.  While they are there, they ask everyone else what they think of the snow and the rain.


As I have observed before, we have too many news programs for a country in which nothing much happens.

Once a day would be more than adequate. On one channel. To be honest, once a week would probably be enough.





9380 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2829

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1383544 9-Sep-2015 17:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4: I don't think anyone here can truly judge the situation and the folks involved in this incident.


To be honest, it does not take me long to judge that someone taking a loaded firearm into McDonalds and discharging it needs putting down with extreme prejudice. A loony is a loony.

The next question will be where did he get the firearm and did the Police licence him to own it or was it illegal. (someone may have answered that somewhere but I have not seen it).





4609 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2082


  Reply # 1383548 9-Sep-2015 17:37
Send private message

TimA:
Dratsab: I can't quite believe the moronity of people, especially a particular 3 News reporter, who seem to think that a taser should have been used - as if it's an appropriate or even effective weapon in an active shooter situation.


Its good they killed him anyway, Save us tax payers incarcerating him.


What a shameful attitude - you've converted a human tragedy into justification for summary execution.
Thank goodness people in positions of authority don't think like you do.
It's not "good" that they killed him - even though it was (probably) justified.  Next you'll be suggesting that the police staff member who at this stage can be presumed to have rightfully used lethal force as a last resort should be hoisted on to the shoulders by his comrades and be presented as a hero for the taxpayer - in some grand parade.  I expect that she/he is not feeling like celebrating.  

+1 x 4 for your post.  Shame x 5 IMO - even if you were trying to be funny.


379 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 1384779 10-Sep-2015 09:43
Send private message

mdooher:
Geektastic:
mdooher:
MikeB4:
TimA:
Dratsab: I can't quite believe the moronity of people, especially a particular 3 News reporter, who seem to think that a taser should have been used - as if it's an appropriate or even effective weapon in an active shooter situation.


Its good they killed him anyway, Save us tax payers incarcerating him.


Remember he was someones son, grandson, brother.


According to Stuff,  "he was a good boy"


According to me, it was "a good shot".

We should now calculate how much he has cost the taxpayer over his lifetime and charge it against his estate as a debt.


Did you read that some stupid bint came out of the shop next to him and was getting him to put the gun down. Stupid cow, putting herself in harms way like that, the Police had no choice but to shoot him.

I really hope someone explains that to her.

Apparently according to this person, he was "just about to put the gun down and give himself up".
Last time I checked, CityStop wasn't in the habit of employing psychiatric qualified staff.  Though, who knows, maybe she decided on a career change from fixing people to providing them their fizzy beverage fix.




523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1384808 10-Sep-2015 10:12
Send private message

mdooher: 

Did you read that some stupid bint came out of the shop next to him and was getting him to put the gun down. Stupid cow, putting herself in harms way like that, the Police had no choice but to shoot him.

I really hope someone explains that to her.


geoffwnz: 
Apparently according to this person, he was "just about to put the gun down and give himself up".
Last time I checked, CityStop wasn't in the habit of employing psychiatric qualified staff.  Though, who knows, maybe she decided on a career change from fixing people to providing them their fizzy beverage fix.


Stupid cow? We need more citizens like this. People with balls to get involved and try and help out. Even if it means putting ones self in danger!

If this went the other way. And he did put the gun down. Would she have still be been a stupid cow?



951 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 456

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1384816 10-Sep-2015 10:18
Send private message

DizzyD:
mdooher: 

Did you read that some stupid bint came out of the shop next to him and was getting him to put the gun down. Stupid cow, putting herself in harms way like that, the Police had no choice but to shoot him.

I really hope someone explains that to her.


geoffwnz: 
Apparently according to this person, he was "just about to put the gun down and give himself up".
Last time I checked, CityStop wasn't in the habit of employing psychiatric qualified staff.  Though, who knows, maybe she decided on a career change from fixing people to providing them their fizzy beverage fix.


Stupid cow? We need more citizens like this. People with balls to get involved and try and help out. Even if it means putting ones self in danger!

If this went the other way. And he did put the gun down. Would she have still be been a stupid cow?




I think you missed the point, the Police rules of engagement mean that because she was standing there they had no choice but to shoot him.

Up until the police arrived she could do whatever she could to help, but once they were there she should have let them handle it.




Matthew


Departed
10563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4589

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1384823 10-Sep-2015 10:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

DizzyD:
mdooher: 

Did you read that some stupid bint came out of the shop next to him and was getting him to put the gun down. Stupid cow, putting herself in harms way like that, the Police had no choice but to shoot him.

I really hope someone explains that to her.


geoffwnz: 
Apparently according to this person, he was "just about to put the gun down and give himself up".
Last time I checked, CityStop wasn't in the habit of employing psychiatric qualified staff.  Though, who knows, maybe she decided on a career change from fixing people to providing them their fizzy beverage fix.


Stupid cow? We need more citizens like this. People with balls to get involved and try and help out. Even if it means putting ones self in danger!

If this went the other way. And he did put the gun down. Would she have still be been a stupid cow?




No we do not, people making the Police job harder. If she had been shot the police would have been blamed. All she achieved was to make lethal force the only option.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


9380 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2829

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1384824 10-Sep-2015 10:38
Send private message

DizzyD:
mdooher: 

Did you read that some stupid bint came out of the shop next to him and was getting him to put the gun down. Stupid cow, putting herself in harms way like that, the Police had no choice but to shoot him.

I really hope someone explains that to her.


geoffwnz: 
Apparently according to this person, he was "just about to put the gun down and give himself up".
Last time I checked, CityStop wasn't in the habit of employing psychiatric qualified staff.  Though, who knows, maybe she decided on a career change from fixing people to providing them their fizzy beverage fix.


Stupid cow? We need more citizens like this. People with balls to get involved and try and help out. Even if it means putting ones self in danger!

If this went the other way. And he did put the gun down. Would she have still be been a stupid cow?




Yes because now we'd be facing a huge bill for legal aid, court and police time, 20 years in prison etc etc.





523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1384833 10-Sep-2015 10:49
Send private message

MikeB4: 

No we do not, people making the Police job harder. If she had been shot the police would have been blamed. All she achieved was to make lethal force the only option.


How do you know she was making their job harder? Were you there?
Maybe she just happened to be in that place at that time? The whole thing (conversation between her and gunman) probably took seconds. Nobody knows. Point is, she did what she though was right at that point in time. She was obviously a very concerned citizen. Kudu's to her at trying to calm the situation. But calling her a stupid cow? come on!!! Its human nature to try and help others in need. I would like to think that most of us whould have probably have done the same thing. 



Departed
10563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4589

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1384854 10-Sep-2015 10:54
Send private message

DizzyD:
MikeB4: 

No we do not, people making the Police job harder. If she had been shot the police would have been blamed. All she achieved was to make lethal force the only option.


How do you know she was making their job harder? Were you there?
Maybe she just happened to be in that place at that time? The whole thing (conversation between her and gunman) probably took seconds. Nobody knows. Point is, she did what she though was right at that point in time. She was obviously a very concerned citizen. Kudu's to her at trying to calm the situation. But calling her a stupid cow? come on!!! Its human nature to try and help others in need. I would like to think that most of us whould have probably have done the same thing. 




It is similar to this scenario. I am/was a trained First Aid. Now at an accident situation I did all I could but as soon as the Paramedics/First responders arrive I do a quick brief and hand over and get well out of it unless asked otherwise.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


951 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 456

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1384870 10-Sep-2015 11:14
Send private message

DizzyD:
MikeB4: 

No we do not, people making the Police job harder. If she had been shot the police would have been blamed. All she achieved was to make lethal force the only option.


How do you know she was making their job harder? Were you there?
Maybe she just happened to be in that place at that time? The whole thing (conversation between her and gunman) probably took seconds. Nobody knows. Point is, she did what she though was right at that point in time. She was obviously a very concerned citizen. Kudu's to her at trying to calm the situation. But calling her a stupid cow? come on!!! Its human nature to try and help others in need. I would like to think that most of us whould have probably have done the same thing. 



Nope, she should not have  interfered. She was stupid for doing so. Hopefully they charge her with obstruction.




Matthew


523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1384875 10-Sep-2015 11:17
Send private message

mdooher:
DizzyD:
MikeB4: 

No we do not, people making the Police job harder. If she had been shot the police would have been blamed. All she achieved was to make lethal force the only option.


How do you know she was making their job harder? Were you there?
Maybe she just happened to be in that place at that time? The whole thing (conversation between her and gunman) probably took seconds. Nobody knows. Point is, she did what she though was right at that point in time. She was obviously a very concerned citizen. Kudu's to her at trying to calm the situation. But calling her a stupid cow? come on!!! Its human nature to try and help others in need. I would like to think that most of us whould have probably have done the same thing. 



Nope, she should not have  interfered. She was stupid for doing so. Hopefully they charge her with obstruction.


There was only one stupid person involved here. 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

How Oppo shakes New Zealand’s phone market
Posted 22-Aug-2017 18:32


Recognition for top small business advisors
Posted 22-Aug-2017 17:23


OPPO R11 dual 20MP camera phone debuts in New Zealand
Posted 22-Aug-2017 15:45


Intel introduces new 8th Generation processors
Posted 21-Aug-2017 19:02


Trend Micro launches Home Network Security
Posted 21-Aug-2017 18:38


Avondale College students at top of Microsoft Office Specialist World Championship
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:11


Garmin introduces inReach SE+ and inReach Explorer+
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:05


Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55


Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.