Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
590 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1409556 20-Oct-2015 06:15
Send private message

rhy7s:
jonathan18: ...

And then there's 'youse' as in 'youse guys' - that literally makes my blood boil.


It is easy to understand the requirement for a second-person plural personal pronoun, as ye has gone by the wayside. There are a number of forms in related languages that are pretty close to 'youse'.


Enlighten me, how is it easy to understand why the second person plural ye has gone by the wayside?
I find the equivalent words in Spanish and Maori used daily.

590 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1409558 20-Oct-2015 06:23
One person supports this post
Send private message

Jaxson: Lol reminds me of geographically challenged people referring to "over there", whilst pointing in the direction they have in their minds, which often beers no resemblance to the direction it's actually in from their present location.

Examples are "outside the shop and turn left" to which you require more information to complete the task, such as "standing outside the shop, facing the road, turn left and head up..."

Not being gender specific here...


A common navigational instruction I hear from one gender but not the other is "turn here", where there are side roads to both the left and the right.

 
 
 
 


590 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1409559 20-Oct-2015 06:33
Send private message

eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.

2210 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 475

Subscriber

  Reply # 1409560 20-Oct-2015 07:20
Send private message

Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


Saves on signwriting costs compared to the correct version. Misleading anyway because when I go to our local Countdown and want to use one of those checkouts, they're often all closed. Another source of my life full of irritations.

1215 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 510


Reply # 1409586 20-Oct-2015 08:38
One person supports this post
Send private message

eracode:
Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


Saves on signwriting costs compared to the correct version. Misleading anyway because when I go to our local Countdown and want to use one of those checkouts, they're often all closed. Another source of my life full of irritations.

They would save more signwriting costs by representing it mathematically as ≤12 items but then ≤ is "less than or equal to" not "fewer than or equal to", so still grammatically incorrect. undecided

As someone who writes for a living, I know language evolves and we can't stand in the way of its progress. English will change with exposure to cultural and international influences whether we want it to or not, so we may as well accept it. For example, I don't mind txt abbreviations in a text message, or even an email, if it is between friends and they are trying to convey a simple message quickly and concisely. I will txt my teenage daughter with things like c u @ home l8r, txt when u r on bus but I don't want to read an email from a supplier written that way - I certainly wouldn't write one - and a front page Dominion Post article written that way would make my blood boil. Words that were originally introduced as slang have been added to dictionaries and are now a part of mainstream language. I have three rules: (1) Spelling is important - pronounciation less so as accents, regional dialects, socio-economic (therefore education) levels, can all play a part. (2) Grammar is important, and incorrect grammar often really annoys me - but I'm flexible when the meaning is still clear without it. (3) The medium and style should suit the intended audience.

951 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 457

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1409589 20-Oct-2015 08:43
Send private message

Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


I have noticed that almost all Australian TV advertisements use the word "less" when they mean "fewer" and I am wondering if this is reason we have seen the "12 items or less" signage proliferate in our supermarkets

Is it an Aussie thing? Don't they know the difference?





Matthew


2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1409635 20-Oct-2015 09:31
Send private message

andrew027:
eracode:
Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


Saves on signwriting costs compared to the correct version. Misleading anyway because when I go to our local Countdown and want to use one of those checkouts, they're often all closed. Another source of my life full of irritations.

They would save more signwriting costs by representing it mathematically as ≤12 items but then ≤ is "less than or equal to" not "fewer than or equal to", so still grammatically incorrect. undecided


I don't think using maths will help when most people seem to struggle with the limits written in english.

Maybe just a picture of a crocodile going to eat the 12...

5283 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2408

Subscriber

  Reply # 1409661 20-Oct-2015 09:46
Send private message

mdooher:
Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


I have noticed that almost all Australian TV advertisements use the word "less" when they mean "fewer" and I am wondering if this is reason we have seen the "12 items or less" signage proliferate in our supermarkets

Is it an Aussie thing? Don't they know the difference?



Have you never seen the Monty Python Woolamaloo University skit? They thought they were exaggerating but actually they were spot-on.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


590 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1409669 20-Oct-2015 10:02
2 people support this post
Send private message

 I have three rules: (1) Spelling is important - pronounciation less so


Pronunciation. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/pronunciation


gzt

8889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1187


  Reply # 1409798 20-Oct-2015 13:35
Send private message

mdooher:
Kiwifruta:
eracode:
Grating use of the word 'amount' as in "A large amount of people ...". Surely it should be "number of people". Amount just sounds wrong in the context of people. Amount is for things or money. Maybe I'm wrong on this one but it irks me nonetheless.

I'm getting too old and grumpy, eh bro?


Similarily, those signs at supermarket express lanes, 12 items or less.


I have noticed that almost all Australian TV advertisements use the word "less" when they mean "fewer" and I am wondering if this is reason we have seen the "12 items or less" signage proliferate in our supermarkets

Is it an Aussie thing? Don't they know the difference?


Seems logical to me. Same as the expression <= 12.

370 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 25


  Reply # 1409800 20-Oct-2015 13:38
Send private message

A few more:
To be honest....
You guys out there....
Cheap price...







Gordy

2833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1008


  Reply # 1409877 20-Oct-2015 15:16
Send private message

Interesting how the perception of bro has changed.

I grew up in low socio-economic are in the Bay or Plenty.  Lot's of the Maori kids at my school called each other bro or cuz.  As a European if I called a Maori classmate bro or cuz, it was seen as racial taunt.

As to police officers: I find whether c_nstable should be spelled (or pronounced) with an o or u is very much a case by case determination. 





Mike

1215 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 510


  Reply # 1410325 21-Oct-2015 09:05
Send private message

Kiwifruta:
 I have three rules: (1) Spelling is important - pronounciation less so


Pronunciation. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/pronunciation 

Ouch! That should teach me to be more careful when editing something I had already typed. I started off with a longer version of that sentence then changed how it was written for brevity - unfortunately I didn't change it enough!

5283 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2408

Subscriber

  Reply # 1410327 21-Oct-2015 09:09
Send private message

There are three kinds of people, those who can count and those who cannot.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1215 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 510


  Reply # 1410332 21-Oct-2015 09:21
Send private message

Rikkitic: There are three kinds of people, those who can count and those who cannot.

Off topic, but I have to tell this story: I once used this joke/quote in a conversation with a number of people, after making a basic maths error when trying to convert US dollars to NZ dollars in my head. I got as far as "There are three kinds of people..." when my daughter (then 10) said loudly "D!cks, pu$$ies and a$$holes!".  Whoops. Somebody had been watching the Team America: World Police DVD without my knowledge!

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Samsung introduces Galaxy Note8
Posted 24-Aug-2017 08:50


How Oppo shakes New Zealand’s phone market
Posted 22-Aug-2017 18:32


Recognition for top small business advisors
Posted 22-Aug-2017 17:23


OPPO R11 dual 20MP camera phone debuts in New Zealand
Posted 22-Aug-2017 15:45


Intel introduces new 8th Generation processors
Posted 21-Aug-2017 19:02


Trend Micro launches Home Network Security
Posted 21-Aug-2017 18:38


Avondale College students at top of Microsoft Office Specialist World Championship
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:11


Garmin introduces inReach SE+ and inReach Explorer+
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:05


Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.