Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 
581 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 113


  Reply # 1418454 2-Nov-2015 05:02
Send private message

DizzyD: Kids nowadays loves saying "Me and my friends" etc. 

I was always taught to put myself last when referring to myself in a sentence. Ie, "My friends and I".

Nowadays I'm really not sure which one is grammatically correct. It was more a case of just common courtesy. 


I is for the subject of the sentence, me for the object (direct and indirect).

2915 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 414

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1418644 2-Nov-2015 10:50
Send private message

Kiwifruta:
DizzyD: Kids nowadays loves saying "Me and my friends" etc. 

I was always taught to put myself last when referring to myself in a sentence. Ie, "My friends and I".

Nowadays I'm really not sure which one is grammatically correct. It was more a case of just common courtesy. 


I is for the subject of the sentence, me for the object (direct and indirect).


No no, he's referring to whether the sentence should lead in with oneself or with the other individuals being referenced. He is correct that conventional teaching is that the sentence leads in with the other individuals ("My friends and I") and to be honest it does read nicer. I don't know if there's a reason other than courtesy why it was done like that.

 
 
 
 


581 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 113


  Reply # 1418654 2-Nov-2015 11:15
Send private message

Kyanar:
Kiwifruta:
DizzyD: Kids nowadays loves saying "Me and my friends" etc. 

I was always taught to put myself last when referring to myself in a sentence. Ie, "My friends and I".

Nowadays I'm really not sure which one is grammatically correct. It was more a case of just common courtesy. 


I is for the subject of the sentence, me for the object (direct and indirect).


No no, he's referring to whether the sentence should lead in with oneself or with the other individuals being referenced. He is correct that conventional teaching is that the sentence leads in with the other individuals ("My friends and I") and to be honest it does read nicer. I don't know if there's a reason other than courtesy why it was done like that.


Kyanar, thank you, yes you are right.

I was also highlighting that we cannot simply swap the "Me and my friends" for "My friends and I" in a sentence.

gzt

8883 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1185


  Reply # 1422077 6-Nov-2015 00:39
Send private message

What, nobody updated this thread on Guy Fox? ; ).

Imho many of these kind of things are just irrational prejudice and frequently wrong anyway.

1708 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 473


  Reply # 1422187 6-Nov-2015 09:36
Send private message

Kyanar:
Kiwifruta:
DizzyD: Kids nowadays loves saying "Me and my friends" etc. 

I was always taught to put myself last when referring to myself in a sentence. Ie, "My friends and I".

Nowadays I'm really not sure which one is grammatically correct. It was more a case of just common courtesy. 


I is for the subject of the sentence, me for the object (direct and indirect).


No no, he's referring to whether the sentence should lead in with oneself or with the other individuals being referenced. He is correct that conventional teaching is that the sentence leads in with the other individuals ("My friends and I") and to be honest it does read nicer. I don't know if there's a reason other than courtesy why it was done like that.


Who remembers the TV Show "Me and My Girl" from back in the day?

Departed
10525 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4571

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1422193 6-Nov-2015 09:46
Send private message

I concentrate on the what not the how of what is being communicated.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


4010 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 555

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1422253 6-Nov-2015 10:56
Send private message

There's tons of filler words that are becoming more and more prevalent.  To be honest if their use eliminates the need to resort to UM and AH 100 times a sentence then I'm ok with it. 

E.G. I tend to say "right?" and the end of sentences quite often.  I've noticed it more and more of myself in the last 2 years or so.

581 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 113


  Reply # 1422296 6-Nov-2015 11:44
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4: I concentrate on the what not the how of what is being communicated.


Agreed, however sometimes a poor how can miscommunicate the what.

4471 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 774

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1422966 7-Nov-2015 21:27
Send private message

Geektastic: I've notice a curious repurposing of the word 'there' recently as follows (some examples):

(on the phone) "What's your name there?" (note: my name here is the same as it is anywhere else...)

(on the phone) "Thanks for waiting there."  (note: where else would I wait if I am talking to you on the phone?)

It seems entirely superfluous and a quite recent trend. Anyone else noticed and why is it suddenly happening?


Isn't that an Irish thing? 

Like always adding "So..." 




____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55


Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57


Thurrott says Microsoft Surface is dead last for reliability
Posted 16-Aug-2017 15:19


LibreOffice 5.4 works better with Microsoft Office files
Posted 16-Aug-2017 13:32


Certus launches Cognition
Posted 14-Aug-2017 09:31


Spark adds Cambridge, Turangi to 4.5G network
Posted 10-Aug-2017 17:55


REANNZ network to receive ongoing Government funding through to 2024
Posted 10-Aug-2017 16:05


Chorus backhaul starts with 2degrees
Posted 10-Aug-2017 15:49


New Zealanders cool on data analytics catching benefit fraud
Posted 10-Aug-2017 09:56



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.