Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




43 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 25


Topic # 182595 22-Oct-2015 16:10
Send private message

I'm looking for some feedback on the following scenario:

We have a monitored security system fitted with a 3G coms module that has been experiencing coms failure. This failure is likely due to being in a Vodafone dead spot. Other than the occasional coms issue the alarm system has been working fine. Today a technician finally came to look at the issue and attempt a solution. During the course of this work the security system hardware has failed and the advice of the security company is that it needs to be replaced. The technician did acknowledge that prior to failure the system was working and that the coms issue had been addressed. It was only while conducting some subsequent coms test that the hardware failed. This particular technician has visited before for a routine system service and I was not inspired by his competence. 

What are the responsibilities of the security firm with regards to liability while working on equipment? I accept that equipment fails but I feel there's too much coincidence for the hardware to just decide that today was it's last day. Unfortunately this is also hard to prove. I am an electrician so I know full well that on occasion people do stupid things and break equipment but so far the security company doesn't want to accept that they might be at fault. The security company is a high profile reputable company, if there is any such thing as reputable in the security field, so they must have been in this situation before. We are most certainly not going to pay the technician $25 per 15 mins for the privilege of leaving us with a unserviceable alarm system.

Any thoughts on how to proceed from here?

Create new topic
2315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 363

Trusted

  Reply # 1411220 22-Oct-2015 16:29
One person supports this post
Send private message

I presume that all the hardware is yours and you where paying the technician to do work on your hardware and it broke (he said) whilst he was doing some tests?

Companies have public liability insurance for these types of things. Proving that the hardware broke was caused by the technician is well very hard.



43 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 25


  Reply # 1411225 22-Oct-2015 16:37
Send private message

LennonNZ: I presume that all the hardware is yours and you where paying the technician to do work on your hardware and it broke (he said) whilst he was doing some tests?

Companies have public liability insurance for these types of things. Proving that the hardware broke was caused by the technician is well very hard.


Correct on all counts. Regardless of outcome we're not going to be using this firm again. Due to the difficulty of proving why the hardware failed I'd expect the security firm to at least entertain the thought of some liability and compensation though. 

 
 
 
 


3060 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 493

Trusted

  Reply # 1411272 22-Oct-2015 18:02
Send private message

Call to "inform them they have 30 days to rectify the situation. If not they can nominate another company who will invoice them for the work and hardware required to rectify the situation. "

I agree with the above - public liability insurance, but a typical alarm panel probably costs less than their excess anyway so it shouldnt be a big deal for them.




Ray Taylor
Taylor Broadband (rural hawkes bay)
www.ruralkiwi.com

There is no place like localhost
For my general guide to extending your wireless network Click Here




Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Samsung itroduces Galaxy Note8
Posted 24-Aug-2017 08:50


How Oppo shakes New Zealand’s phone market
Posted 22-Aug-2017 18:32


Recognition for top small business advisors
Posted 22-Aug-2017 17:23


OPPO R11 dual 20MP camera phone debuts in New Zealand
Posted 22-Aug-2017 15:45


Intel introduces new 8th Generation processors
Posted 21-Aug-2017 19:02


Trend Micro launches Home Network Security
Posted 21-Aug-2017 18:38


Avondale College students at top of Microsoft Office Specialist World Championship
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:11


Garmin introduces inReach SE+ and inReach Explorer+
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:05


Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.