Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
4781 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 890

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433794 24-Nov-2015 11:02
Send private message

Rikkitic: The relevance of Trade Me in today's e-commerce world is a subject that has been dealt with before but I feel impelled to revisit it once more.

I live at a rural address and I often need to buy small items. I used to use Trade Me for this but increasingly the traders there insist on using only courier post, with ridiculous charges for delivery to rural addresses. Often the postage is more than the cost of the item.

Yes, we all have friends in town to get around that but my question is why should we have to? I have posted about this on the Trade Me forum in the past and most of the responses were along the lines of it's only a few dollars so what is your problem? I guess my problem is that where I grew up the customer was always king. If this kind of service is what the customer wants, then it should be provided without question. Otherwise you go out of business. 

Today I ran into the same thing again. I needed a couple of small items and looked first on Trade Me. I sent a query to the seller and the response was not only could they not send it by ordinary post at my risk, but I could only pay for it through the bank, despite Pay Now being on the listing.

My response? Why bother? I went to Aliexpress and immediately found better alternatives for less money, not to mention free shipping to any address in New Zealand, rural or otherwise. Is it any wonder that Trade Me is losing customers? 


Couriers make it harder to claim you never received the parcel....and there are people who do this all the time. Sad, but true. 




____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


10072 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3082

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433870 24-Nov-2015 12:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

Linuxluver:
Rikkitic: The relevance of Trade Me in today's e-commerce world is a subject that has been dealt with before but I feel impelled to revisit it once more.

I live at a rural address and I often need to buy small items. I used to use Trade Me for this but increasingly the traders there insist on using only courier post, with ridiculous charges for delivery to rural addresses. Often the postage is more than the cost of the item.

Yes, we all have friends in town to get around that but my question is why should we have to? I have posted about this on the Trade Me forum in the past and most of the responses were along the lines of it's only a few dollars so what is your problem? I guess my problem is that where I grew up the customer was always king. If this kind of service is what the customer wants, then it should be provided without question. Otherwise you go out of business. 

Today I ran into the same thing again. I needed a couple of small items and looked first on Trade Me. I sent a query to the seller and the response was not only could they not send it by ordinary post at my risk, but I could only pay for it through the bank, despite Pay Now being on the listing.

My response? Why bother? I went to Aliexpress and immediately found better alternatives for less money, not to mention free shipping to any address in New Zealand, rural or otherwise. Is it any wonder that Trade Me is losing customers? 


Couriers make it harder to claim you never received the parcel....and there are people who do this all the time. Sad, but true. 


Hardly: I can't tell you the number of signature required items I have had left at our house with no signature..!





 
 
 
 


20429 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3901

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433871 24-Nov-2015 12:19
Send private message

Geektastic:

Hardly: I can't tell you the number of signature required items I have had left at our house with no signature..!


In which case a claim can be made with the courier for the losses. Eventually. After many hoops to jump thru.




Richard rich.ms

IT Professional
1703 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 166

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433873 24-Nov-2015 12:20
Send private message

Geektastic:
Linuxluver:
Rikkitic: The relevance of Trade Me in today's e-commerce world is a subject that has been dealt with before but I feel impelled to revisit it once more.

I live at a rural address and I often need to buy small items. I used to use Trade Me for this but increasingly the traders there insist on using only courier post, with ridiculous charges for delivery to rural addresses. Often the postage is more than the cost of the item.

Yes, we all have friends in town to get around that but my question is why should we have to? I have posted about this on the Trade Me forum in the past and most of the responses were along the lines of it's only a few dollars so what is your problem? I guess my problem is that where I grew up the customer was always king. If this kind of service is what the customer wants, then it should be provided without question. Otherwise you go out of business. 

Today I ran into the same thing again. I needed a couple of small items and looked first on Trade Me. I sent a query to the seller and the response was not only could they not send it by ordinary post at my risk, but I could only pay for it through the bank, despite Pay Now being on the listing.

My response? Why bother? I went to Aliexpress and immediately found better alternatives for less money, not to mention free shipping to any address in New Zealand, rural or otherwise. Is it any wonder that Trade Me is losing customers? 


Couriers make it harder to claim you never received the parcel....and there are people who do this all the time. Sad, but true. 


Hardly: I can't tell you the number of signature required items I have had left at our house with no signature..!


I wonder if that more comes down to slack individuals trying to maximise the efficiency of their courier runs ($$$), rather than company policy...



5952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2781

Subscriber

  Reply # 1433874 24-Nov-2015 12:21
Send private message

This point has been made several times. I don't know about the legal aspects, but I would think that a clear 'at your risk' notification ought to be adequate, especially if Trade Me supported this by not allowing negative feedback on at your risk deliveries. If the item then doesn't arrive, that is just too bad. That is what at your risk means.

I have done this many times in the past when traders were more willing to include regular post and I never had a single item fail to arrive in good time. Sometimes the regular post deliveries got here faster than the courier post ones.
 




I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1214 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 142


  Reply # 1433881 24-Nov-2015 12:35
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:  I don't know about the legal aspects, but I would think that a clear 'at your risk' notification ought to be adequate, 
 


You can not contract out of the Consumer Guarantees Act, regardless if it is the buyer or the seller who initiates the attempt to contract out.  

The CGA requires that the seller ensure delivery, the buyer can not say "at my risk", or if they do the seller must still assume the risk ultimately because such a contracting-out is unenforceable.







---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


20429 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3901

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433885 24-Nov-2015 12:41
Send private message

Rikkitic: This point has been made several times. I don't know about the legal aspects, but I would think that a clear 'at your risk' notification ought to be adequate, especially if Trade Me supported this by not allowing negative feedback on at your risk deliveries. If the item then doesn't arrive, that is just too bad. That is what at your risk means.


Law does not allow for that. If you are paying the seller for the delivery of goods then they have to warranty the delivery as much as the goods themselves. Many sellers do not understand their obligations on trademe and trademe do nothing to try to educate sellers so its all a bit of a mes.




Richard rich.ms



5952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2781

Subscriber

  Reply # 1433886 24-Nov-2015 12:42
Send private message

I'm sure you are right but it doesn't seem sensible to me. If an auction has regular post 'at your risk' and risk-free post via courier, what is the problem? At least it gives the buyer a choice.




I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


20429 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3901

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433887 24-Nov-2015 12:44
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic: I'm sure you are right but it doesn't seem sensible to me. If an auction has regular post 'at your risk' and risk-free post via courier, what is the problem? At least it gives the buyer a choice.


The problem is that the sellers have to guarantee that the goods are fit for purpose, ones that do not arrive are not fit for purpose.

If you feel that you should be able to contract out of it then talk to your MP about why the law states that you cannot contract out of the CGA when selling to a consumer.




Richard rich.ms

IT Professional
1703 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 166

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433890 24-Nov-2015 12:46
Send private message

Rikkitic: I'm sure you are right but it doesn't seem sensible to me. If an auction has regular post 'at your risk' and risk-free post via courier, what is the problem? At least it gives the buyer a choice.


You need to note think of it from the recipients POV, but rather the sellers POV - even if someone accepts "at your risk" or asks for "at my risk" - the onus is still back on the seller and it is always the seller who is out of pocket.

As others have said, TradeMe as absolutely useless as they happily take everyones money, but won't lift a finger when there is an issue. Very different to eBay - chalk and cheese.

1214 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 142


  Reply # 1433892 24-Nov-2015 12:49
2 people support this post
Send private message

Rikkitic: If an auction has regular post 'at your risk' and risk-free post via courier.


That is in fact an even bigger problem legally, because if it is the seller (in trade) who says 'at your risk' then not only is it unenforceable under the CGA, but it is a violation of the Fair Trading Act as an attempt to mislead the customer about their rights.




---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...




5952 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2781

Subscriber

  Reply # 1433898 24-Nov-2015 13:11
Send private message

Ok I give up. It still doesn't seem sensible to me but I accept that this is the way it is. It wouldn't be the first instance of poor law-making.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


20429 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3901

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1433907 24-Nov-2015 13:25
Send private message

I don't think that laws to make sure you get what you paid for are bad.




Richard rich.ms

58 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 30


  Reply # 1433918 24-Nov-2015 13:43
Send private message

I default to Amazon for all purchases now. For the kind of things I am after it's all I need. The only thing I'd use Trade Me for today would be to sell that crappy couch for a $1 reserve just to get someone to take it away.

2765 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1168


  Reply # 1433923 24-Nov-2015 13:55
Send private message

CGA doesn't apply to private sellers. 





Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23


New Fujifilm macro lens lands in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:16


Cyber security not being taken seriously enough
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:13


Sony commences Android 8.0 Oreo rollout in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:08



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.