Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
483 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 286

Trusted

  Reply # 1441267 6-Dec-2015 10:01
Send private message

They didn't shoot the Planned Parenthood suspect.

I thought the general rule was shoot to kill or don't shoot at all.

No warnings shots, no shoot to wing, no shoot the gun out of his hands, those are only for Hollywood.

3011 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 882

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1441280 6-Dec-2015 10:34
Send private message

roobarb: I thought the general rule was shoot to kill or don't shoot at all.

Shoot to incapacitate.

 
 
 
 


11679 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5329

Trusted

  Reply # 1441299 6-Dec-2015 11:42
Send private message

Love the arm chair experts several thousand kms from the scene of the incident.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2396 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 549

Subscriber

  Reply # 1441301 6-Dec-2015 11:43
Send private message

Dratsab:
roobarb: I thought the general rule was shoot to kill or don't shoot at all.

Shoot to incapacitate.


Death is pretty incapacitating.

2850 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1275


  Reply # 1441303 6-Dec-2015 11:49
One person supports this post
Send private message

eracode:
Dratsab:
roobarb: I thought the general rule was shoot to kill or don't shoot at all.

Shoot to incapacitate.


Death is pretty incapacitating.


Job done then...




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



gzt

9399 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 1441329 6-Dec-2015 12:08
Send private message

roobarb: They didn't shoot the Planned Parenthood suspect.

I thought the general rule was shoot to kill or don't shoot at all.

No warnings shots, no shoot to wing, no shoot the gun out of his hands, those are only for Hollywood.

According to Wikipedia they shot at him but shots did not connect with the guy much if at all. At some point after five hours of fire exchange they asked him to come out and surrender and he agreed.

gzt

9399 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 1441344 6-Dec-2015 13:04
Send private message

nakedmolerat: What happen to the 3rd guy they caught? Any update to this? Nothing in the news....

San Bernadino police say the '3rd guy' they saw running was apprehended and found to have an outstanding warrant and no connection to the events:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-san-bernardino-suspects-sprayed-the-room-with-bullets-20151203-story.html

5407 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2603


  Reply # 1441408 6-Dec-2015 14:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

So this case (San Bernadino) is pretty well what ISIL wants.  Not specifically coordinated well-organised quasi-military "freedom fighter" (depending on what side of the fence you're on) or whatever you'd like to call it, having some specific objective, except to generate hatred and fear, and probably retaliatory attacks against innocent muslims by equally clueless and possibly only slightly less radicalised random nutcases on the "other side" and/or Donald Trump style draconian restrictions based on nationality/religion.  Two radicalised nutcases - and again everybody who knew them claims to be "surprised".  A Sufi, radicalised in Saudi Arabia?  No surprises.
I thought the cops handled it well. If it took ten thousand bullets to stop those two and they did it without accidentally shooting innocent people, who cares?  It must have been pretty obvious to them from the outset that it was a terrorist style attack and not too many guesses needed as to what motivated them.  I watched a bit as it unfolded - not that I'd usually get fixated on latest news, but it was live streaming on a small window in news site link I clicked, and it was interesting.  The FBI/polce news conferences were very guarded / careful about what they disclosed, probably for a very good reason.  Last thing you'd want in the heat of the moment is for vigilante action by crazy americans, joining in to protect the homeland in it's moment of need by shooting random suspicious looking Sikhs in the street etc.  So far I haven't read of any retaliatory stupid actions, burning mosques etc.  Probably never completely stop this kind of thing now that it's established as an option/motive for suicidal nutters, but at least deny ISIL any opportunity to use it to promote their vision for holy war. 

5407 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2603


  Reply # 1441418 6-Dec-2015 16:06
3 people support this post
Send private message


10622 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3292

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1441625 6-Dec-2015 22:59
Send private message

eracode:
DarthKermit: They deserved what they both got.


Maybe they should suffer more?


Generally I would agree but hanging, drawing and quartering is deemed so last century by the liberal hand-wringers.





10622 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3292

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1441626 6-Dec-2015 23:00
Send private message

We managed to taser the one in London this morning.





483 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 286

Trusted

  Reply # 1441699 7-Dec-2015 07:29
Send private message

Geektastic: We managed to taser the one in London this morning.


He didn't have an assault rifle.

7257 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2313

Subscriber

  Reply # 1441701 7-Dec-2015 07:34
Send private message

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

that is taught world wide to different police and military forces

2165 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1039


  Reply # 1441822 7-Dec-2015 09:51
Send private message

networkn: You are suggesting putting officers in FURTHER danger by asking them to Shoot to INJURE, whilst being shot at, by crazy people who would kill innocents at a disability centre. 

Trials are all well and good if you can apprehend criminals without undue safety concerns to law enforcement and people.

Furthermore, trials cost millions, bullets cost just a few dollars. Little to no chance of not being found guilty.


So, are these people crazy or not? In the sense of legally insane? Because that is a defence against virtually any crime.

Interesting that the FBI has labelled them as terrorists, and presumably therefore NOT insane.


2165 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1039


  Reply # 1441833 7-Dec-2015 10:18
Send private message

not too many guesses needed as to what motivated them


When I first heard about this shooting, my first guess was that the guy had gone postal. Before all the Muslim terrorist paranoia, that wasn't uncommon. I still suspect that there's more of the postal about this than an organised by ISIS terror attack. My guess is that the "radicalisation" of these people was opportunistic on top of some kind of underlying nuttiness. The scenario I see is that ISIS encounters (maybe even targets) some nut-job in the USA who says they intend to shoot a bunch of people... all ISIS needs to do is provide them with a bit of encouragement and prepare a press release.

Whilst it remains my opinion that you can't "radicalise" a mentally healthy person who has a good future, it is cautionary to think of all the people who were "radicalised" to fight the Kaiser and later Nazism and Communism.



1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Fujifilm X beats its best with new top of the range, high-performance camera
Posted 24-Feb-2018 14:05


One million kiwis affected by cybercrime
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:58


New Zealanders want to engage with government online and via mobile apps
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:56


Samsung launches Samsung Max
Posted 24-Feb-2018 13:52


CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43


Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27


2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25


Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.