Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
2450 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 510


  Reply # 1455938 23-Dec-2015 12:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

Lias:
dickytim: 
Motorcycle gangs are generally thinly disguised criminal organisation.


Someones been drinking the police koolaid.




I have no issue with Motorcycle clubs, but the gangs are a bunch of thugs who go around intimidating others, it really isn't on, again why would we want these people in our country?




I know a little more than nothing but not much...

5973 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2791

Subscriber

  Reply # 1455939 23-Dec-2015 12:18
Send private message

richms: 


Such crazy censorship! How did it work out for the hick town that tried to ban gang patches?




Not so well but that hick town was run by a backward neanderthal. Hospitals ban gang patches. So, I think, does WINZ. So do courts and other institutions. If they can make it work, why can't a hick town?





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


 
 
 
 


3757 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 576

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1455944 23-Dec-2015 12:27
Send private message

Rikkitic:
alasta: In civilised countries people don't get prosecuted until they commit a crime. It's a very slippery slope to suggest that people should be prosecuted because they look like they might commit a crime.


??? Have you heard of ISIS? People here and in Australia (and Europe and the USA) are now being arrested for planning/intending/thinking about joining the group, or even just flying to somewhere in the region.


I object to that just as much as I object to banning gang patches. 

If you belong to, or support, ISIS then you're a dick but being a dick in itself isn't a crime. 

700 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 143


  Reply # 1456210 23-Dec-2015 18:30
Send private message

alasta:
Rikkitic:
alasta: In civilised countries people don't get prosecuted until they commit a crime. It's a very slippery slope to suggest that people should be prosecuted because they look like they might commit a crime.


??? Have you heard of ISIS? People here and in Australia (and Europe and the USA) are now being arrested for planning/intending/thinking about joining the group, or even just flying to somewhere in the region.


I object to that just as much as I object to banning gang patches. 

If you belong to, or support, ISIS then you're a dick but being a dick in itself isn't a crime. 


So someone thinks about harming someone, displays actions that suggest intent but are ultimately unsuccessful. Attempted murder, assault etc - Is that not a crime? Where do you draw the line? It's pretty grey right?



10080 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3084

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1456214 23-Dec-2015 18:41
Send private message

kiwifidget: What's a Hobnob? 


A very tasty type of biscuit.







10080 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3084

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1456215 23-Dec-2015 18:43
Send private message

My point was that they hate people who are not "entitled" to wear their patches wearing them.

We can devalue them completely if we ALL wear them...





1413 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 193


  Reply # 1456242 23-Dec-2015 19:56
Send private message

Geektastic: My point was that they hate people who are not "entitled" to wear their patches wearing them.

We can devalue them completely if we ALL wear them...


Then they'd just move on to some other symbol. Like shave half their heads. I'm not shaving half my head. Besides, you're liable to get beat up by the 'other' rival gangs!

Onward
11400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5125

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1456270 23-Dec-2015 20:38
Send private message

JayADee:
Geektastic: My point was that they hate people who are not "entitled" to wear their patches wearing them.

We can devalue them completely if we ALL wear them...


Then they'd just move on to some other symbol. Like shave half their heads. I'm not shaving half my head. Besides, you're liable to get beat up by the 'other' rival gangs!


Hope they don't shave, medication has made my head shaven :( I don't want to look like a gang member




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2300 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 939


  Reply # 1456308 23-Dec-2015 21:44
Send private message

Rikkitic:

??? Have you heard of ISIS? People here and in Australia (and Europe and the USA) are now being arrested for planning/intending/thinking about joining the group, or even just flying to somewhere in the region. If you think there is a slippery slope here, I would suggest to you that the avalanche is already well underway. The difference, if any, is that the one is thought crime while the other is displaying a banner. I am utterly against censorship in all forms but I am even more against morons who misuse symbols to throw their weight around. As far as I am concerned, anyone can wear anything they like, or even nothing at all, but as soon it is abused they lose their right to an uncensored existence. Freedom comes with responsibility.



Ummm.... firstly you can't both be "utterly against censorship", and also advocate jailing someone for a breach of the peace for displaying a symbol/phrase that you don't like. The two positions are totally contradictory. Secondly, freedom may indeed come with responsibility, but if you don't have free speech (including the ability to put a symbol/slogan about your beliefs on a shirt without being arrested and jailed), then you don't exactly have freedom.

It's easy to stand up for free speech when the other person is saying something you approve of. The real test is whether you still stand up for their right to speech when they are saying something you find offensive and utterly reprehensible. If you won't, then you don't really believe in free speech.



5973 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2791

Subscriber

  Reply # 1456341 23-Dec-2015 22:55
4 people support this post
Send private message

There is a real difference here which people seem to be overlooking. First, free speech does not exist. If you think it does, try posting some ISIS recruitment propaganda on Facebook. Or publish an essay on the joys of sex with children. Speech is only 'free' as long as it does not seriously challenge accepted values or the established order. Sure, you can yell 'F... John Key' but if people actually start trying to F him as a result of your incitement, your freedom to say that will be rapidly curtailed.  

We don't live in a 'free' society. That is a myth. We do live in a reasonably tolerant one, and that is good enough for many. As soon as you get over the notion that it is 'free', though, it becomes a lot easier to comprehend the limits to that freedom. For example, if you ban gang patches, you are not heading down a slippery slope at all, because you went down that slope a long time ago. You are not creating a dangerous precedent, because it already exists. Society isn't free, speech isn't free, and you can ban anything you want without precipitating the end of the world as long as a majority agree with you.  

I am in fact utterly against censorship but I also understand that there are different ways of defining it and they mainly have to do with context. In my perfect society anyone should be able to say anything. A gang member is free to tell anyone that he is a gang member. He can say it, but he cannot display it. Those are two different things. A patch is not free speech. It is an aggressive display, like openly carrying a weapon. It is an implied threat. It is against the law to utter a threat in this country. Would you say that is censorship? It could be, depending on how you define it, but most people would not see it that way because they appreciate the greater value of having such a law. I see no contradiction here.

Edited to correct loss of layout





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


2958 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 839

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1456354 23-Dec-2015 23:40
2 people support this post
Send private message

tdgeek: Its a Police issue.

No, it's a social issue - but society doesn't want to deal with it so it gets pushed onto police.

2450 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 510


  Reply # 1456380 24-Dec-2015 06:50
Send private message

Dratsab:
tdgeek: Its a Police issue.

No, it's a social issue - but society doesn't want to deal with it so it gets pushed onto police.


The Police are there to defend our society so that makes sense.




I know a little more than nothing but not much...

1413 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 193


  Reply # 1456529 24-Dec-2015 14:47
Send private message

MikeB4:
JayADee:
Geektastic: My point was that they hate people who are not "entitled" to wear their patches wearing them.

We can devalue them completely if we ALL wear them...


Then they'd just move on to some other symbol. Like shave half their heads. I'm not shaving half my head. Besides, you're liable to get beat up by the 'other' rival gangs!


Hope they don't shave, medication has made my head shaven :( I don't want to look like a gang member


Shaved head is sexy in a man. Bet you look cool.

1020 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 351

Subscriber

  Reply # 1456531 24-Dec-2015 14:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

If you banned gang patches what would the police wear.




Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man


gzt

9159 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1291


  Reply # 1456538 24-Dec-2015 15:05
Send private message

I suggest one of those shades of pink they use in police cells to keep prisoners calm. That will take the heat out of a lot of situations.

1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23


New Fujifilm macro lens lands in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:16


Cyber security not being taken seriously enough
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:13


Sony commences Android 8.0 Oreo rollout in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:08



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.