Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | ... | 362
11030 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3462

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1653051 18-Oct-2016 16:25
Send private message quote this post

Behodar:

 

Geektastic: Possibly; idiot rules are found in most workplaces IME!

 

I had a good laugh the other day; the chief executive announced a project to reduce the number of policies by an order of magnitude, as many of them are outdated or simply common sense. Twenty minutes later she's talking about introducing a new policy for something else...

 

 

 

 

I know. I used to have to sign Helen Clark's mobile phone bills (along with all the Cabinet Minister's bills). I asked why.

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment."

 

 

 

"Umm. So, if I refuse to sign, you won't pay the PM's phone bill and her mobile will be cut off?"

 

 

 

"Well, no. Of course not. That wouldn't happen."

 

 

 

"So why am I wasting time every month doing this again?"

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment. It says you have to in the rules."

 

 

 

"Doh."






11894 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5519

Trusted

  Reply # 1653060 18-Oct-2016 16:39
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

 

 

 

 

I know. I used to have to sign Helen Clark's mobile phone bills (along with all the Cabinet Minister's bills). I asked why.

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment."

 

 

 

"Umm. So, if I refuse to sign, you won't pay the PM's phone bill and her mobile will be cut off?"

 

 

 

"Well, no. Of course not. That wouldn't happen."

 

 

 

"So why am I wasting time every month doing this again?"

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment. It says you have to in the rules."

 

 

 

"Doh."

 

 

 

 

It helps prevent fraud, reference Otago Health





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software
20883 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4095

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1653082 18-Oct-2016 17:39
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

It helps prevent fraud, reference Otago Health

 

 

Or mediaworks... That is a whopper of a failure in process there.





Richard rich.ms

5802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2852


  Reply # 1653201 18-Oct-2016 22:59
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

 

 

It helps prevent fraud, reference Otago Health

 

 

 

 

Given how many internal and external audits that one got through before the penny dropped, I'm not sure if it's in the same league.   They probably had a process in place to do just that - check phone bills - as well.


11030 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3462

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1653208 18-Oct-2016 23:45
Send private message quote this post

It helps prevent fraud...if your Prime Minister is the type of person who does that. I suppose...






11894 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5519

Trusted

  Reply # 1653225 19-Oct-2016 07:02
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

It helps prevent fraud...if your Prime Minister is the type of person who does that. I suppose...



No, it helps prevent others from defrauding by putting through false invoicing etc. Something as a senior manager in a Government department I was trained for and constantly vigilant for.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


5802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2852


  Reply # 1653259 19-Oct-2016 07:54
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:
Geektastic:

 

It helps prevent fraud...if your Prime Minister is the type of person who does that. I suppose...

 



No, it helps prevent others from defrauding by putting through false invoicing etc. Something as a senior manager in a Government department I was trained for and constantly vigilant for.

 

 

 

But what if you were "in on it"?

 

I presume the Otago DHB thought they were vigilant, I think PWC were auditing them.  On one hand there's perhaps an assumption that because they got away with it for so long, then it must have been a "sophisticated scheme" - but from what I see it was just a typical false invoicing scheme. Invoices for IT services quite a good idea with a large organisation using outside services.  Then there's the flawed logic that goes along the lines of "they'll always get caught - in the end".  Well... - actually only the ones that get caught get caught,  the ones that don't get caught tend to keep quiet about it.

 

 

 

 


11894 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5519

Trusted

  Reply # 1653300 19-Oct-2016 08:49
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

 

 

 

 

But what if you were "in on it"?

 

I presume the Otago DHB thought they were vigilant, I think PWC were auditing them.  On one hand there's perhaps an assumption that because they got away with it for so long, then it must have been a "sophisticated scheme" - but from what I see it was just a typical false invoicing scheme. Invoices for IT services quite a good idea with a large organisation using outside services.  Then there's the flawed logic that goes along the lines of "they'll always get caught - in the end".  Well... - actually only the ones that get caught get caught,  the ones that don't get caught tend to keep quiet about it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There are checks and multiple authentication in the process,  however as I said it "helps" prevent fraud.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1161 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 113


  Reply # 1653322 19-Oct-2016 09:20
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

Behodar:

 

Geektastic: Possibly; idiot rules are found in most workplaces IME!

 

I had a good laugh the other day; the chief executive announced a project to reduce the number of policies by an order of magnitude, as many of them are outdated or simply common sense. Twenty minutes later she's talking about introducing a new policy for something else...

 

 

 

 

I know. I used to have to sign Helen Clark's mobile phone bills (along with all the Cabinet Minister's bills). I asked why.

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment."

 

 

 

"Umm. So, if I refuse to sign, you won't pay the PM's phone bill and her mobile will be cut off?"

 

 

 

"Well, no. Of course not. That wouldn't happen."

 

 

 

"So why am I wasting time every month doing this again?"

 

 

 

"To authorise them for payment. It says you have to in the rules."

 

 

 

"Doh."

 

 

At a conference I went to last year someone offered up a quote (forgot who it was from), along the lines of "Policy is organisational scar tissue, a punishment for the transgressions of the past."  As a person who writes policy professionally, I was a little affronted but also amused, as it's not completely wrong.  A lot of policy is written as an overreaction to a past problem, or sometimes a perceived problem with an inflated risk assessment.  Policy usually (but not always) starts out as a good idea, but the rationale and reasoning can often get lost over time, and people end up blindly following policy without understanding why.  

 

My counterpoint to the "organisational scar tissue" quote would be that policy is a substitute for independent thinking.  Many organisations develop policy to avoid giving employees too much discretion or control ("just follow the policy"), or to absolve them of responsibility in the face of tricky situations ("I'm just following policy").  I make a point of following through any project I'm working on to explain to those people who have to enact a policy why it's there (they don't have to agree with the reason, but they do need to understand it), why it's important, and what would happen if it wasn't there.  The problem is, over time, people move on and a lot of that information gets lost or muddled, and that's generally how policy gets a bad rap when people find themselves confronted with yet another "dumb" policy.


5802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2852


  Reply # 1653349 19-Oct-2016 10:15
Send private message quote this post

Lizard1977:

 

 

 

At a conference I went to last year someone offered up a quote (forgot who it was from), along the lines of "Policy is organisational scar tissue, a punishment for the transgressions of the past."  As a person who writes policy professionally, I was a little affronted but also amused, as it's not completely wrong.  A lot of policy is written as an overreaction to a past problem, or sometimes a perceived problem with an inflated risk assessment.  Policy usually (but not always) starts out as a good idea, but the rationale and reasoning can often get lost over time, and people end up blindly following policy without understanding why.  

 

My counterpoint to the "organisational scar tissue" quote would be that policy is a substitute for independent thinking.  Many organisations develop policy to avoid giving employees too much discretion or control ("just follow the policy"), or to absolve them of responsibility in the face of tricky situations ("I'm just following policy").  I make a point of following through any project I'm working on to explain to those people who have to enact a policy why it's there (they don't have to agree with the reason, but they do need to understand it), why it's important, and what would happen if it wasn't there.  The problem is, over time, people move on and a lot of that information gets lost or muddled, and that's generally how policy gets a bad rap when people find themselves confronted with yet another "dumb" policy.

 

 

One of the last organisations I worked for, we stored food and food grade product in warehouses around the country, poo from assorted vermin a potentially serious contamination issue.   Documenting policy however, the end result was a 100 page thesis within the mountain of warehousing policy.  It went in to great detail, the person with the policy document on his desk would be able to identify if the poo was pigeon, starling, or sparrow, mouse, rattus or norwegicus depending on the gloss on the turd.  Then intricate detail about lifestyle, habits, zoonotic diseases transmitted and their consequence, down to descriptions of arthropod vectors of diseases that nobody has ever heard of for hundreds of years.  There were photos of the bloody things in the internal policy document.  As a regional manager, I was affronted by this huge waste of time and effort, especially as it had taken the national distribution manager half his career to write - during which time maintaining normal operation seemed to have been an afterthought.  It made absolutely no difference at all to operations - the whole thing could have been avoided and summed up in a few short lines:

 

Employ standards approved experts to inspect warehouse, implement preventative measures, check at recognised standard intervals, and deal with any problem if found.
If problem is observed or reported in between checks - call in experts as above.

 

Too much policy IMO turns what should be simple - in to rocket science.

 

 


5802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2852


  Reply # 1653351 19-Oct-2016 10:19
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

 

 

There are checks and multiple authentication in the process,  however as I said it "helps" prevent fraud.

 

 

In the example @Geektastic gave - serious mobile telephone account fraud by politicians.

 

Trump would stamp out that kind of thing - put them in prison, you betcha, make the place great again.


2559 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 600


  Reply # 1653353 19-Oct-2016 10:21
Send private message quote this post

people who park facing the traffic, not only illegal but how lazy are you that you cant walk across the road like normal people.  


11030 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3462

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1653363 19-Oct-2016 10:33
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

vexxxboy:

 

people who park facing the traffic, not only illegal but how lazy are you that you cant walk across the road like normal people.  

 

 

 

 

As a point of general knowledge, doing that is not illegal in many places - UK for example - and I can't really see the point of the rule.

 

Better to prevent people parking as close to junctions as they currently can - it really obscures vision for other drivers.






6819 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3193

Subscriber

  Reply # 1653393 19-Oct-2016 11:02
Send private message quote this post

New Zealand is the only place I know of that has this parking rule. I also don't see the point of it. If traffic is light there is nothing dangerous about parking on the other side.

 

 

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


11894 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5519

Trusted

  Reply # 1653424 19-Oct-2016 11:21
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

New Zealand is the only place I know of that has this parking rule. I also don't see the point of it. If traffic is light there is nothing dangerous about parking on the other side.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I prefer our system as opposed to the mess overseas. To park and exit you are driving against traffic flow which is dangerous. It is safer if parking is only done on the side you are travelling, U turns to park should be illegal.

 

One  thing I would like changed is with angle parking it would make more sense the angle the parks so that reversing into the park is done. Sighting traffic would be easier when parking and exiting.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1 | ... | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | ... | 362
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon launches the International Shopping Experience in the Amazon Shopping App
Posted 19-Apr-2018 08:38


Spark New Zealand and TVNZ to bring coverage of Rugby World Cup 2019
Posted 16-Apr-2018 06:55


How Google can seize Microsoft Office crown
Posted 14-Apr-2018 11:08


How back office transformation drives IRD efficiency
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:15


iPod laws in a smartphone world: will we ever get copyright right?
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:13


Lightbox service using big data and analytics to learn more about customers
Posted 9-Apr-2018 12:11


111 mobile caller location extended to iOS
Posted 6-Apr-2018 13:50


Huawei announces the HUAWEI P20 series
Posted 29-Mar-2018 11:41


Symantec Internet Security Threat Report shows increased endpoint technology risks
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:29


Spark switches on long-range IoT network across New Zealand
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:22


Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18


Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47


Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25


New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48


Shipments tumble as NZ phone upgrades slow
Posted 2-Mar-2018 11:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.