Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | ... | 640
14253 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1562044 30-May-2016 09:37
Send private message quote this post

Behodar:

 

That's... helpful!

 

On the topic of movies (assuming that that's what it's from), movies that were presented at 2.39:1 theatrically but are at 1.78:1 for their home releases. I'm setting up a home theatre and I have a 2.39:1 screen, so I don't want pillarboxes! Some are easily salvageable (Interstellar) but others are a nightmare (Avatar, I'm looking at you!)

 

 

 

 

On the plus side, Avatar is an awful movie so no need to watch..!






3007 posts

Uber Geek


  #1562110 30-May-2016 10:35
Send private message quote this post

Behodar:

 

That's... helpful!

 

On the topic of movies (assuming that that's what it's from), movies that were presented at 2.39:1 theatrically but are at 1.78:1 for their home releases. I'm setting up a home theatre and I have a 2.39:1 screen, so I don't want pillarboxes! Some are easily salvageable (Interstellar) but others are a nightmare (Avatar, I'm looking at you!)

 

 

This isn't very common at all with modern movies, and I think you have picked two of the very few examples of this (unless you are talking about when they are broadcast on network TV). What other movies have been released like this?

 

Avatar was filmed with both aspect ratios in mind and was actually released to cinemas in both formats (depending on where you saw it). James Cameron decided in between the theatrical and video release that he preferred the 1:85.1 version and so mandated it as the only version for video release. I personally prefer 2.39:1 as it looks more cinematic, but in this instance 1.85:1 is still technically an intended aspect ratio from the beginning.

 

For its Blu-Ray release Chris Nolan did what he has done in his last few movies and released it in a variable aspect ratio. 2.39:1 for most of the feature and 1.78:1 for the IMAX sequences. The intention here is to add extra height to the IMAX scenes. However with a fixed 2.39:1 screen you will not get this benefit and will instead crop the top and bottom of the IMAX sequences (which is essentially how it was viewed in non-IMAX theatres originally).

 

I've also seen this a few times with 3D Blu-Rays, where the 3D version is 1.78:1 and the 2D version is 2.39:1. But I'm not counting those as 3D sucks anyway.


 
 
 
 


BDFL - Memuneh
66494 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1562138 30-May-2016 10:42
Send private message quote this post

People in large companies who think they can come bossing around Geekzone.




23097 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1562139 30-May-2016 10:43
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

freitasm: People in large companies who think they can come bossing around Geekzone.

 

 

 

Who has done it this time?





Richard rich.ms

6965 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1562140 30-May-2016 10:46
Send private message quote this post

Paul1977: This isn't very common at all with modern movies, and I think you have picked two of the very few examples of this

 

Well, yes, it is something *small* that annoys you :)

 

Paul1977: Avatar was filmed with both aspect ratios in mind and was actually released to cinemas in both formats (depending on where you saw it). James Cameron decided in between the theatrical and video release that he preferred the 1:85.1 version and so mandated it as the only version for video release. I personally prefer 2.39:1 as it looks more cinematic, but in this instance 1.85:1 is still technically an intended aspect ratio from the beginning.

 

1.85 doesn't fill my screen (I think it's actually 1.78) so I'd prefer to have it in 2.39, but my "grizzle" was that that's not available. You can't just crop to 2.39 because some of the shots have been recomposed.

 

Paul1977: For its Blu-Ray release Chris Nolan did what he has done in his last few movies and released it in a variable aspect ratio. 2.39:1 for most of the feature and 1.78:1 for the IMAX sequences. The intention here is to add extra height to the IMAX scenes. However with a fixed 2.39:1 screen you will not get this benefit and will instead crop the top and bottom of the IMAX sequences (which is essentially how it was viewed in non-IMAX theatres originally).

 

Yep, the UltraViolet download was in fixed 2.39 and I was able to confirm that it's a simple "centre extract" for the Imax scenes. That's why I said that it's salvageable :)


4574 posts

Uber Geek


  #1562145 30-May-2016 10:50
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

Behodar:

 

That's... helpful!

 

On the topic of movies (assuming that that's what it's from), movies that were presented at 2.39:1 theatrically but are at 1.78:1 for their home releases. I'm setting up a home theatre and I have a 2.39:1 screen, so I don't want pillarboxes! Some are easily salvageable (Interstellar) but others are a nightmare (Avatar, I'm looking at you!)

 

 

 

 

On the plus side, Avatar is an awful movie so no need to watch..!

 

 

I enjoyed avatar.   Sure, it has gaping great plot holes and tries to preach that hippy tree huggers are better than marines ... but ignore all that and it is an entertaining david vs goliath storyline with ground breaking special fx for the time.

 

As for something small that annoys me --- people who do not indicate that they want your car park....  eg, yesterday i was about to reverse out of a park and a car was coming and stopped --- i wasn't sure if they were going to continue or wanted my park so I wait.... so , they flash their lights and start waving their arms around that i can go... surely it would be clearer and faster to simply use their indicator?


4574 posts

Uber Geek


  #1562151 30-May-2016 10:58
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

[addition to the previous]   Drivers who think they are being nice to you when they gesture to let you go first when you don't actually have the legal right of way.   Trying to be nice I suppose, but I prefer to stick to the actual road rules.


 
 
 
 


6965 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1562157 30-May-2016 11:05
Send private message quote this post

That reminds me of the time when someone was coming the wrong way down the one-way street in front of work. I calmly came to a stop in the middle of the road and waited for them to turn around. Or, in this case, to glare at me and then drive up onto the kerb and around my car!


BDFL - Memuneh
66494 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1562158 30-May-2016 11:06
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

On this note, people who thinks road rules completely disappear once they get into a supermarket car park - including not following the big white arrows painted on the paths.





14979 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1562162 30-May-2016 11:10
Send private message quote this post

freitasm:

 

On this note, people who thinks road rules completely disappear once they get into a supermarket car park - including not following the big white arrows painted on the paths.

 

 

 

 

Just to be pedantic as it is Monday and I am in Auckland they don't really as it is private property and not officially a road 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


4574 posts

Uber Geek


  #1562165 30-May-2016 11:13
Send private message quote this post

freitasm:

 

On this note, people who thinks road rules completely disappear once they get into a supermarket car park - including not following the big white arrows painted on the paths.

 

 

Ha ha, this reminds me of yesterday at the Harvey norman (kindle sale by the way) carpark at Mt Maunganui opposite bayfair.  One of the carpark lanes is one way and is frequently ignored. 

 

Yesterday was particularly annoying because I drove the long way round to get a park that I spotted in that one way lane, but some geezer just ignores the one way and drives the quick way and steals the park i was about to get.

 

So, should I just join the rule breakers?  The dilemma.

 

 


4574 posts

Uber Geek


  #1562166 30-May-2016 11:14
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

freitasm:

 

On this note, people who thinks road rules completely disappear once they get into a supermarket car park - including not following the big white arrows painted on the paths.

 

 

 

 

Just to be pedantic as it is Monday and I am in Auckland they don't really as it is private property and not officially a road 

 

 

How does it work in event of a collision? If there are no rules?


14979 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1562168 30-May-2016 11:17
Send private message quote this post

surfisup1000:

 

MikeB4:

 

freitasm:

 

On this note, people who thinks road rules completely disappear once they get into a supermarket car park - including not following the big white arrows painted on the paths.

 

 

 

 

Just to be pedantic as it is Monday and I am in Auckland they don't really as it is private property and not officially a road 

 

 

How does it work in event of a collision? If there are no rules?

 

 

 

 

The rule is if they person that you hit is big and evil they are in the right that's it. Then queue the Insurance company from the safety of home. tongue-out 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


23097 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1562173 30-May-2016 11:21
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

Just to be pedantic as it is Monday and I am in Auckland they don't really as it is private property and not officially a road 

 

 

Publicly accessible means they do last I inquired.

 

That is how the cops do people for whatever fines and stuff when doing burnouts in an empty carpark at night.

 

If there is a gate that is closed then it makes a difference apparently since it is no longer publically accessible.





Richard rich.ms

14979 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1562190 30-May-2016 11:24
Send private message quote this post

richms:

 

MikeB4:

 

Just to be pedantic as it is Monday and I am in Auckland they don't really as it is private property and not officially a road 

 

 

Publicly accessible means they do last I inquired.

 

That is how the cops do people for whatever fines and stuff when doing burnouts in an empty carpark at night.

 

If there is a gate that is closed then it makes a difference apparently since it is no longer publically accessible.

 

 

 

 

If it is a council car park I believe the rules apply but I maybe 1000% wrong. The police could nab you for public nuisance for the burnouts.

 

It would be great if one of our legal fratenity  members could answer this, I believe it comes down to the legal definition of a road.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


1 | ... | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | ... | 640
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone and Imperial College London invite smartphone users to help fight diseases
Posted 9-Apr-2020 11:09


Unisys Always-On Access Powered by Stealth provides fast, encrypted remote access for workers
Posted 9-Apr-2020 10:00


Intel introduces 10th Gen Intel Core H-series for mobile devices
Posted 2-Apr-2020 21:09


COVID-19: new charitable initiative to fund remote monitoring for at-risk patients
Posted 2-Apr-2020 11:07


Huawei introduces the P40 Series of Android-based smartphones
Posted 31-Mar-2020 17:03


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip now available for pre-order in New Zealand
Posted 31-Mar-2020 16:39


New online learning platform for kids stuck at home during COVID-19 lockdown
Posted 26-Mar-2020 21:35


New 5G Nokia smartphone unveiled as portfolio expands
Posted 26-Mar-2020 17:11


D-Link ANZ launches wireless AC1200 4G LTE router
Posted 26-Mar-2020 16:32


Ring introduces two new video doorbells and new pre-roll technology
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:59


OPPO uncovers flagship Find X2 Pro smartphone
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:54


D-Link COVR-2202 mesh Wi-Fi system now protected by McAfee
Posted 17-Mar-2020 16:00


Spark Sport opens its platform up to all New Zealanders at no charge
Posted 17-Mar-2020 10:04


Spark launches 5G Starter Fund
Posted 8-Mar-2020 19:19


TRENDnet launches high-performance WiFi Mesh Router System
Posted 5-Mar-2020 08:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.