Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | ... | 109
5841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2883


  Reply # 1654884 20-Oct-2016 08:21
Send private message

...and talking about spying, it turns out that Assange was "unplugged" by the Ecuadorean government - not UK/US "spooks" jamming/cutting communication.  They claim they did that because they don't want to be implicated in interference / meddling in the democratic process - that they weren't "leaned on" by the US.

 

This sideshow has me baffled.  The "leaks" so far show up Clinton for being a politician, I don't see anything surprising there, that's what they do - spin stuff to suit the audience.  Here too.

 

Perhaps Assange is sitting on something that could be really disruptive.  If Clinton beats Trump, then Assange immediately drops a bombshell when he's plugged back in, that'll be very nice for the USA.

 

Meanwhile, Assange has changed from being folk hero trying to play the high moral ground ticket, to using Wikileaks as a weapon to retaliate against the entire US, which he appears to hate.  

 

 


6875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3222

Subscriber

  Reply # 1654907 20-Oct-2016 09:06
Send private message

I think Assange has good reason to hate the US, but I don't see how unplugging him would stop Wikileaks from publishing anything. He is already at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software
Mad Scientist
18119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654909 20-Oct-2016 09:15
Send private message

It's ok the Russians have Snowden


5841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2883


  Reply # 1654916 20-Oct-2016 09:39
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

I think Assange has good reason to hate the US, but I don't see how unplugging him would stop Wikileaks from publishing anything. He is already at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.

 

 

 

 

 

 

In that case you must believe the Ecuadorians in saying that their decision to unplug Assange wasn't due to them being leaned on by the US.

 

Assange isn't going to sabotage his only refuge - as you say he's at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.


16509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4609

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654944 20-Oct-2016 10:12
Send private message

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids. 


6875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3222

Subscriber

  Reply # 1654951 20-Oct-2016 10:26
Send private message

Agree completely. I still think Clinton is the lesser of evils but neither is fit to be President. I sure wish they could do this over.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


16509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4609

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654961 20-Oct-2016 10:37
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Agree completely. I still think Clinton is the lesser of evils but neither is fit to be President. I sure wish they could do this over.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't think it would make any difference. Americans CHOSE these candidates. They appeal for a variety of (very) different reasons. 

 

The reality is we will probably never understand, but then we don't really need to, it's not our country. 

 

 


5841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2883


  Reply # 1654962 20-Oct-2016 10:38
Send private message

networkn:

 

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids. 

 

 

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies.  Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

 

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

 

 


16509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4609

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654966 20-Oct-2016 10:45
Send private message

Fred99:

 

networkn:

 

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids. 

 

 

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies.  Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

 

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted. 

 

 


Mad Scientist
18119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654974 20-Oct-2016 10:51
Send private message

networkn:

 

Fred99:

 

networkn:

 

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids. 

 

 

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies.  Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

 

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted. 

 

 

 

 

Maybe it's her age/health ie not as sharp as you hope she'd be? At least that's what I am getting across from Trump.


5841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2883


  Reply # 1654992 20-Oct-2016 11:01
Send private message

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don't want to be accused of sexism, but it's difficult for a women to "shout down" a male opponent without presenting an appearance of being hysterical. There have certainly been some women who've got over this very very well - Thatcher, our own Helen Clark, and others when in their prime,  were extremely quick-witted and talented -  with a few off the cuff words delivered with superb timing - they could demolish opposition attacks.  That left the male attackers screaming at a woman - an even worse bullying look - so they'd just concede.

 

Clinton just hasn't got it.


Mad Scientist
18119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1654998 20-Oct-2016 11:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

Fred99:

 

Clinton just hasn't got it.

 

 

Or that.


1475 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 675


  Reply # 1655056 20-Oct-2016 12:35
Send private message

networkn:

 

Fred99:

 

networkn:

 

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids. 

 

 

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies.  Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

 

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How would you handle debating with a person like Trump knowing he is going to focus on your husband and even having so called husbands ex lovers sitting in room. I think she handled it quite well...she stated at the start that she was going to take the high road...but when  confronted with so many lies and garbage she got a bit off topic.

 

Not saying I support her...but in comparison to her bullying opponent she is miles more ready to be the leader of USA, than the other person.


4301 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1815

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1655110 20-Oct-2016 14:18
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

 

 

How would you handle debating with a person like Trump knowing he is going to focus on your husband and even having so called husbands ex lovers sitting in room. I think she handled it quite well...she stated at the start that she was going to take the high road...but when  confronted with so many lies and garbage she got a bit off topic.

 

Not saying I support her...but in comparison to her bullying opponent she is miles more ready to be the leader of USA, than the other person.

 

 

If it was me, I'd probably lead with something along the lines of 'I honestly don't know how to debate someone who can deny themselves 10 times in 5 seconds and absolutely believe that every statement was true.'





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


16509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4609

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1655123 20-Oct-2016 14:43
Send private message

Wow, so far it's pretty good! Both are better than they have been. Clinton is better, but Trump is somewhat coherent. 

 

 


1 | ... | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | ... | 109
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

TCF and Telcos Toughen Up on Scam Callers
Posted 23-Apr-2018 09:39


Amazon launches the International Shopping Experience in the Amazon Shopping App
Posted 19-Apr-2018 08:38


Spark New Zealand and TVNZ to bring coverage of Rugby World Cup 2019
Posted 16-Apr-2018 06:55


How Google can seize Microsoft Office crown
Posted 14-Apr-2018 11:08


How back office transformation drives IRD efficiency
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:15


iPod laws in a smartphone world: will we ever get copyright right?
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:13


Lightbox service using big data and analytics to learn more about customers
Posted 9-Apr-2018 12:11


111 mobile caller location extended to iOS
Posted 6-Apr-2018 13:50


Huawei announces the HUAWEI P20 series
Posted 29-Mar-2018 11:41


Symantec Internet Security Threat Report shows increased endpoint technology risks
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:29


Spark switches on long-range IoT network across New Zealand
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:22


Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18


Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47


Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25


New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.