Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
6340 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1100

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1479736 27-Jan-2016 11:30
2 people support this post
Send private message

Indeed. It's not difficult!

 


mdf

2023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 599

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1480226 27-Jan-2016 20:15
Send private message

I do think education has something to do with it.

 

I was in college in the 90s and was never expressly taught grammar as part of English - English (at least then) was very much a focus on literature, creative writing etc. Doing another language, even to a basic level, was one of the better decisions I've made. I got more out of third form latin than my entire secondary schooling in "English".

 

I also think that the pace of life has massively increased. Once upon a time, formal communication was largely by letter. You received a letter, thought about it a day or two, then wrote a response. Email = not so much time to think.

 

Finally, English is a fast evolving language. Our "proper" English grammar today would probably be the worst kind of gutter slang to the Elizabethans. Think, in a hundred years or so you may receive your diploma in "txt spk" (as an interesting aside, text speak has a historical precedent in telegrams which were charged by the letter so brief communications became the norm for a while. Didn't catch on though).


 
 
 
 


4541 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510

Trusted

  Reply # 1480228 27-Jan-2016 20:24
Send private message

Dingbatt: My favourite at the moment is my teenage son's use of the word "guttering" for something that has caused disappointment. So much so, that I placed a small offcut of some plastic guttering on his desk to remind him of what guttering actually is.

 

"I'm guttered that I didn't win Lotto on Saturday." I see that (mis) used often.


6340 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1100

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1480233 27-Jan-2016 20:39
One person supports this post
Send private message

mdf: English is a fast evolving language.

 

"Quickly".

 

tongue-out


mdf

2023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 599

Trusted
Subscriber

Reply # 1480248 27-Jan-2016 20:57
Send private message

Behodar:

 

mdf: English is a fast evolving language.

 

"Quickly".

 

tongue-out

 

 

What about fast-evolving?


6340 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1100

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1480249 27-Jan-2016 20:59
Send private message

Personally I'd have used "quickly-evolving" with the "dash" (there's a specific word for it but it's not coming to mind)!


4541 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510

Trusted

  Reply # 1480250 27-Jan-2016 21:02
Send private message

A hyphen?


6340 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1100

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1480251 27-Jan-2016 21:03
Send private message

That's the one. I knew it was simple!


64 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 14


  Reply # 1480263 27-Jan-2016 21:50
Send private message

I don't think there is anythink wrong with having this discussion. Sigh.


1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 1480289 27-Jan-2016 22:50
Send private message

mdf:

(snip)...

I also think that the pace of life has massively increased. Once upon a time, formal communication was largely by letter. You received a letter, thought about it a day or two, then wrote a response. Email = not so much time to think...(snip)
.



Email does allow you time to think. It's the time you take to think that's the issue.

hear here, hare hair...
more examples of english language,and spelling, evolution.

When tracing the family tree we found ancestors with various spellings; Mc.... , Mac.... , followed by various interprative spellings of the last part of the name. Seems historically the local Vicars, who recorded births/deaths, weren't the best scholars and regularly mis-recorded family names due to their own inabilites, poor penmanship, bad light/eyesight.... or perhaps just too much grog. Certainly they didn't have a spell checking tombe in their book shelf, and those they were recording wouldn't have known better.

It's also possible the English class system contributed to the obtusifaction of language by using different spellings to give multiple meanings.....

Personally I don't like the obvious grammatical errors (they're & there) as these are two very different words, but their/there I accept as errors. Like a lot of folk I don't really know, or care to, understand the differences and deffinitions of 'verbs' & 'adverbs' and 'irregular verbs', not to mention 'pronouns' etc.... I like to think I'm evolving too.

12134 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3947

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1480301 27-Jan-2016 23:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

mdf:

 

I do think education has something to do with it.

 

I was in college in the 90s and was never expressly taught grammar as part of English - English (at least then) was very much a focus on literature, creative writing etc. Doing another language, even to a basic level, was one of the better decisions I've made. I got more out of third form latin than my entire secondary schooling in "English".

 

I also think that the pace of life has massively increased. Once upon a time, formal communication was largely by letter. You received a letter, thought about it a day or two, then wrote a response. Email = not so much time to think.

 

Finally, English is a fast evolving language. Our "proper" English grammar today would probably be the worst kind of gutter slang to the Elizabethans. Think, in a hundred years or so you may receive your diploma in "txt spk" (as an interesting aside, text speak has a historical precedent in telegrams which were charged by the letter so brief communications became the norm for a while. Didn't catch on though).

 

 

 

 

I entirely agree with you about letters.

 

 

 

I remember the delights of my secretary bringing the morning post, already placed in the relevant files, and putting them in my In Tray.

 

My replies, written in manuscript or dictated, went in Typing Grids to the typing pool.

 

24 hrs later they were returned for checking and signature. At this point, one had the opportunity to review and sometimes to reflect that hasty words would be best re-phrased.

 

As Churchill said, tact is the art of telling someone to go to hell in such a way as he looks forward to the journey.

 

I think the problem today comes from the demand for immediate response. I've certainly had calls along the lines of "I sent you an email an hour ago and I haven't heard from you yet!".






13563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6358

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1480362 28-Jan-2016 07:10
Send private message

Geektastic:

mdf:


I do think education has something to do with it.


I was in college in the 90s and was never expressly taught grammar as part of English - English (at least then) was very much a focus on literature, creative writing etc. Doing another language, even to a basic level, was one of the better decisions I've made. I got more out of third form latin than my entire secondary schooling in "English".


I also think that the pace of life has massively increased. Once upon a time, formal communication was largely by letter. You received a letter, thought about it a day or two, then wrote a response. Email = not so much time to think.


Finally, English is a fast evolving language. Our "proper" English grammar today would probably be the worst kind of gutter slang to the Elizabethans. Think, in a hundred years or so you may receive your diploma in "txt spk" (as an interesting aside, text speak has a historical precedent in telegrams which were charged by the letter so brief communications became the norm for a while. Didn't catch on though).



 


I entirely agree with you about letters.


 


I remember the delights of my secretary bringing the morning post, already placed in the relevant files, and putting them in my In Tray.


My replies, written in manuscript or dictated, went in Typing Grids to the typing pool.


24 hrs later they were returned for checking and signature. At this point, one had the opportunity to review and sometimes to reflect that hasty words would be best re-phrased.


As Churchill said, tact is the art of telling someone to go to hell in such a way as he looks forward to the journey.


I think the problem today comes from the demand for immediate response. I've certainly had calls along the lines of "I sent you an email an hour ago and I haven't heard from you yet!".



Give me email any day over last century's snail mail.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


27258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6688

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1480388 28-Jan-2016 07:50
Send private message

One of my biggest pet hates is the incorrect use of plurals for Maori words. One very common case of this is the use for those in Wellington is the use of the of the word "Rimutakas" to describe the Rimutaka hill road. Even NZTA ads on the radio right now talk about "roadworks on the Rimutakas".

 

There was debate last year over Rimutaka actually not meaning anything in Maori (it should be Remutaka) but it doesn't change the fact that people are trying to make a Maori word a plural, something the language doesn't have.

 

Even in English it makes no sense making it a plural - there is only one hill and one mountain range!

 

 

 

 

 

 


13563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6358

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1480393 28-Jan-2016 08:03
Send private message

sbiddle:

One of my biggest pet hates is the incorrect use of plurals for Maori words. One very common case of this is the use for those in Wellington is the use of the of the word "Rimutakas" to describe the Rimutaka hill road. Even NZTA ads on the radio right now talk about "roadworks on the Rimutakas".


There was debate last year over Rimutaka actually not meaning anything in Maori (it should be Remutaka) but it doesn't change the fact that people are trying to make a Maori word a plural, something the language doesn't have.


Even in English it makes no sense making it a plural - there is only one hill and one mountain range!


 


 


 



A mountain range is a series of hills and mountains so the Rimutaka Range is a plural.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


3153 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 960

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1480432 28-Jan-2016 08:55
One person supports this post
Send private message

oxnsox: Certainly they didn't have a spell checking tombe in their book shelf... 

 

tome on [/snerk]


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.