Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
5061 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1030

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507919 8-Mar-2016 09:30
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

 

 

The thing is, the au pair arrangement was established legally in Australia... families are mobile and take holidays. Requiring work visas for au pairs is small minded in my view as this is hardly displacing new zealand workers.   

 

I think this is more a case of bullying than upholding NZ law.

 

 

Thinking more broadly, any such rules would have to apply to any country. If you treat one country differently to another, that raises thorny issues as well.

 

But even more generally - for example - let's say some tourists start arriving with 19yo 'au pairs' who then spend a week or three working in a brothel while the family is "on holiday". Maybe that's already happening. Maybe that is what is behind this.  It could just as easily be a cover story for human trafficking. Customs are on to single young women arriving for this purpose.....and we see on TV how many are sent back (rightly or wrongly). 





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


Mad Scientist
18436 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2336

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1507920 8-Mar-2016 09:31
Send private message

MikeB4:

I find it intriguing, I could probably pull hundreds of threads where folks are saying media sites lite NZH, Stuff etc etc are rubbish, the reporters are rubbish and the stories are wrong. However if the story is anti officialdom then it is correct, intriguing 



Nobody here is anti officialdom.
Unlike some people, most people break laws. All the time.
Because some laws are more like, guidelines. Especially bringing nannies along on holidays. Or bringing a work laptop on holidays.

5061 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1030

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507922 8-Mar-2016 09:33
Send private message

joker97:

 


Nobody here is anti officialdom.

 

....

 


 

Almost nobody. (Not looking at anyone in particular....)  ;-)  





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


4373 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1888

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507926 8-Mar-2016 09:40
2 people support this post
Send private message

Linuxluver:

 

joker97:

 


Nobody here is anti officialdom.

 

....

 


 

Almost nobody. (Not looking at anyone in particular....)  ;-)  

 

 

 

 

As Scott Adams once said, "I'm not anti-management, I'm anti-idiot." Just because something is against the law doesn't mean that it's wrong. Just because something is allowed by the law, doesn't mean that it's right. There are bad laws, and there are good laws. There are bad officials, and there are officials who haven't been officials long enough to become bad officials.

 

This decision, even if it was technically correct,* was a dumb one. It's not often I agree with the PM!

 

 

 

 

 

*The best kind of correct. Especially if you're a narrow-minded bureaucrat.





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


12423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5826

Trusted

  Reply # 1507929 8-Mar-2016 09:44
One person supports this post
Send private message

SaltyNZ:

 

Linuxluver:

 

joker97:

 


Nobody here is anti officialdom.

 

....

 


 

Almost nobody. (Not looking at anyone in particular....)  ;-)  

 

 

 

 

As Scott Adams once said, "I'm not anti-management, I'm anti-idiot." Just because something is against the law doesn't mean that it's wrong. Just because something is allowed by the law, doesn't mean that it's right. There are bad laws, and there are good laws. There are bad officials, and there are officials who haven't been officials long enough to become bad officials.

 

This decision, even if it was technically correct,* was a dumb one. It's not often I agree with the PM!

 

 

 

 

 

*The best kind of correct. Especially if you're a narrow-minded bureaucrat.

 

 

 

 

So the PM thinks the law is wrong, hmm now who is that has the power to change that? The the poor sod earning his living as an Immigration Officer or the poor sod earning his living or part there of in the Beehive.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


4373 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1888

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507945 8-Mar-2016 10:06
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

 

 

So the PM thinks the law is wrong, hmm now who is that has the power to change that? The the poor sod earning his living as an Immigration Officer or the poor sod earning his living or part there of in the Beehive.

 

 

 

 

We haven't got time to deal with this now, we have to change the flag! :-D

 

You're right - the fault in this case lies with parliament for setting it up this way. However, clearly, the law is being applied unevenly already. If, technically, it's against the law for me to answer my work phone whilst on holiday in NZ, then the law is clearly wrong because practically everyone who visits here would do so. But we don't turn them away, because we know that's ridiculous. That being the case, the official who made this decision should have applied the same logic this time.

 

What it comes down to is that they can't hide behind the 'we were just following the rules' defense when it is obvious on the face of it that 99% of visitors don't get turned away when they otherwise 'should' be. Because if they were just following the rules this time, then they're breaking them 99% of the time otherwise.

 

 





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.




11250 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3579

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507952 8-Mar-2016 10:18
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

I find it intriguing, I could probably pull hundreds of threads where folks are saying media sites lite NZH, Stuff etc etc are rubbish, the reporters are rubbish and the stories are wrong. However if the story is anti officialdom then it is correct, intriguing 

 

 

 

 

Well, this one had enough truth to elicit a comment from the PM...






12423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5826

Trusted

  Reply # 1507959 8-Mar-2016 10:31
2 people support this post
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

MikeB4:

 

I find it intriguing, I could probably pull hundreds of threads where folks are saying media sites lite NZH, Stuff etc etc are rubbish, the reporters are rubbish and the stories are wrong. However if the story is anti officialdom then it is correct, intriguing 

 

 

 

 

Well, this one had enough truth to elicit a comment from the PM...

 

 

 

 

politician and truth in the same sentence? now not withstanding anything to the contrary and having regard to all relevant factors and weighing up carefully the significant pro and cons, one can, in these instances be drawn to the inevitable conclusion that this on the face of it,

 

is to the best of ones ability to conclude with the evidence at hand an oxymoron.  





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


3064 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 909

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1507961 8-Mar-2016 10:34
Send private message

MikeB4:
joker97: You'll have to ask dept of immigration.

Dunedin has two inbound international flights a week. But it has a port. Presumably they share the workers.

Queenstown has an average of three inbound international flights a day. I wonder how many people are employed to staff that schedule.


So your figure was plucked from the air

 

If it's like Wellington there's probably one. Then again, being a small centre there may not be any. Very often what happens in Wellington is the immigration interview is conducted over the phone with an official in Christchurch. If there wasn't an immigration person present at Queenstown airport, the same over the phone process would have happened.


3583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1138


  Reply # 1507964 8-Mar-2016 10:38
2 people support this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

So the PM thinks the law is wrong, hmm now who is that has the power to change that? The the poor sod earning his living as an Immigration Officer or the poor sod earning his living or part there of in the Beehive.

 

 

You assume the law was applied correctly here, and also that the PM is responsible for every bad law. 

 

In my view it is the immigration department that should know about these types of injustices and recommend changes.  If they don't, then who will?  

 

You cannot expect the poorly deported to complain to the immigration minister. 

 

Just my lay view, with respect to the inner workings of law making. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


3583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1138


  Reply # 1507969 8-Mar-2016 10:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

I find it intriguing, I could probably pull hundreds of threads where folks are saying media sites lite NZH, Stuff etc etc are rubbish, the reporters are rubbish and the stories are wrong. However if the story is anti officialdom then it is correct, intriguing 

 

 

Agree that affirmative bias is a real human flaw. 

 

But look, the family gave a privacy waiver to immigration, yet immigration still declines to elaborate.  

 

Nothing to suggest so far that this is being misreported which is not to say it hasn't, but what else can you do other than utilise the most current information? 

 

 


12423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5826

Trusted

  Reply # 1507970 8-Mar-2016 10:49
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

MikeB4:

 

So the PM thinks the law is wrong, hmm now who is that has the power to change that? The the poor sod earning his living as an Immigration Officer or the poor sod earning his living or part there of in the Beehive.

 

 

You assume the law was applied correctly here, and also that the PM is responsible for every bad law. 

 

In my view it is the immigration department that should know about these types of injustices and recommend changes.  If they don't, then who will?  

 

You cannot expect the poorly deported to complain to the immigration minister. 

 

Just my lay view, with respect to the inner workings of law making. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is the Statutory requirements and there is the policy requirements. The former is enacted in Parliament with Royal assent, this is black and white or should be black and white and every decision made by Immigration staff, MSD Staff, etc has to comply with and able to be assigned 

 

the appropriate section etc of the empowering act.

 

Then there is official policy, this is drafted by the appropriate Department advisers and CEO and approved by the Minister and Cabinet. This must be backed by and related to the empowering act. This is the approved decision making criteria which officers must comply with.

 

Now some areas have discretion in certain circumstances but again that discretion is authorized under the empowering act.

 

Working for a statutory body is considerably different to working for say Vodafone or Harvey Normans.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


12423 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5826

Trusted

  Reply # 1507973 8-Mar-2016 10:50
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

MikeB4:

 

I find it intriguing, I could probably pull hundreds of threads where folks are saying media sites lite NZH, Stuff etc etc are rubbish, the reporters are rubbish and the stories are wrong. However if the story is anti officialdom then it is correct, intriguing 

 

 

Agree that affirmative bias is a real human flaw. 

 

But look, the family gave a privacy waiver to immigration, yet immigration still declines to elaborate.  

 

Nothing to suggest so far that this is being misreported which is not to say it hasn't, but what else can you do other than utilise the most current information? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They can only elaborate if they have the authority and the privacy clearance of ALL concerned not just one party.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2342 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1133


  Reply # 1507977 8-Mar-2016 11:00
Send private message

surfisup1000:

 

MikeB4:

 

So the PM thinks the law is wrong, hmm now who is that has the power to change that? The the poor sod earning his living as an Immigration Officer or the poor sod earning his living or part there of in the Beehive.

 

 

You assume the law was applied correctly here, and also that the PM is responsible for every bad law. 

 

In my view it is the immigration department that should know about these types of injustices and recommend changes.  If they don't, then who will?  

 

 

 

 

You assume that they haven't.

 

In the end, the Govt has the power to change the law, and therefore has the responsibility when the law is wrong/bad. The Govt also controls and directs the immigration department, so if the immigration department don't know about these types of injustices and/or don't recommend changes, then that's the Govt's responsibility too.

 

But, in my view, the whole thing could have been avoided if the au pair applied for the right type of visa. The question that should be asked is why she didn't. Did she and her employers not know the rules? If not, why not? Why wasn't this apparently important information communicated to them? Or did they willfully break the law? If so, why?

 

Maybe a procedural change should be made, where people coming to NZ for (I dunno) 1 week or less and intending to continue their usual work be allowed to apply for a work visa (which would normally be granted) on arrival.

 

 


3064 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 909

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1508011 8-Mar-2016 11:33
Send private message

MikeB4: There is the Statutory requirements and there is the policy requirements. The former is enacted in Parliament with Royal assent, this is black and white or should be black and white and every decision made by Immigration staff, MSD Staff, etc has to comply with and able to be assigned 

 

the appropriate section etc of the empowering act.

 

Then there is official policy, this is drafted by the appropriate Department advisers and CEO and approved by the Minister and Cabinet. This must be backed by and related to the empowering act. This is the approved decision making criteria which officers must comply with.

 

Now some areas have discretion in certain circumstances but again that discretion is authorized under the empowering act.

 

Working for a statutory body is considerably different to working for say Vodafone or Harvey Normans.

 

Nothing in law is black and white which is how precedents arise. Whilst I generally agree with your comments re policy, the human element also has to be factored in. Some people will do the least they have to within the policy framework, some will push it (and delight in doing so) to the nth degree.

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.