Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


462 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 108


Topic # 195094 6-Apr-2016 10:54
Send private message

NZ Post is going to sell 45% of Kiwibank:

 

- 25% to the NZ Super Fund

 

- 20% to ACC

 

Kiwibank has been valued at $1.1bn

 

Both entities must hold the shares for at least 5 years, and if they do sell, it must be back to the crown.

 

Story here:

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/78607205/nz-post-chairman-sir-michael-cullen-signals-major-announcement

 

 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2

gzt

10125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1541


  Reply # 1526819 6-Apr-2016 11:12
Send private message

Must sell to the crown?

 

Stuff: "Kiwibank will remain 100 per cent government-owned - that is a bottom-line," Finance Minister Bill English said. "To ensure this occurs, the proposal includes a right of first refusal for the Government over any future sale of shares - which we would exercise."

 

The clear implication is that the way is prepared for an easy partial sale to a third party after five years.

 

The article itself does not state anywhere that it cannot be sold to a private entity.

1822 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 664

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526823 6-Apr-2016 11:17
Send private message

Which will be swiftly followed by me changing banks.

 

A.

 

 

 

 


2096 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 509


  Reply # 1526824 6-Apr-2016 11:18
2 people support this post
Send private message

Aka New Zealand tax payers 495 million dollar cash injection to NZ Post???

 

 

 

 




462 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 108


  Reply # 1526836 6-Apr-2016 11:20
Send private message

And ACC just decreased levies on 1 April, down from 1.45 to 1.39 per $100.00...

 

I assume that'll go back up next year


509 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155
Inactive user


  Reply # 1526839 6-Apr-2016 11:27
Send private message

Why, what's the point ?

 

This is very suspicious , key was on Paul Henry just yesterday saying it wouldn't be sold.

 

It makes financial sense that Kiwibank probably should "be with" loss-making NZ post then they can write off more losses.

 

I wonder if Merril Lynch gets paid  brokerage fees for this, as they did in the previous asset sales.

 

can anyone tell me why another govt department would buy an existing one.

 

It sounds to me like they are trying to remove NZ post from it, hence making it look like a profitable entity, and there is only one reason you try to make something look profitable, so you can increase its sale price


956 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 346
Inactive user


  Reply # 1526841 6-Apr-2016 11:31
Send private message

Won't it allow Kiwibank to have access to additional capital and growth options vs going no where under NZ Post?




462 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 108


  Reply # 1526846 6-Apr-2016 11:41
One person supports this post
Send private message

I can understand the NZ Super Fund having a stake, if Kiwibank is profitable, then dividends paid will boost the fund.

 

Maybe the same scenario applies to ACC, if kiwibank is making money, ACC then can lower levies etc.


2417 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1181

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526857 6-Apr-2016 12:00
Send private message

turnin:

 

Why, what's the point ?

 

It makes financial sense that Kiwibank probably should "be with" loss-making NZ post then they can write off more losses.

 

It sounds to me like they are trying to remove NZ post from it, hence making it look like a profitable entity, and there is only one reason you try to make something look profitable, so you can increase its sale price

 

 

I think it does make sense to separate them, just as it made sense to split Telecom off from the Post Office... at the moment, KiwiBank is subsidizing the failing NZPost, and disguising NZPost's real losses.

 

Why it should be sold off to ACC & NZSF is unclear though. I suspect this is to avoid any finger-pointing about asset sales ("We're not selling them... just shuffling them around"). An election not far off, and asset sales was a PR disaster last time round.

 

 


11831 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3836

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526864 6-Apr-2016 12:05
3 people support this post
Send private message

Looks like money go round to me - all the 'buyers' are ultimately the same person, the Crown!






509 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155
Inactive user


  Reply # 1526866 6-Apr-2016 12:06
Send private message

JamesL:

 

Won't it allow Kiwibank to have access to additional capital and growth options vs going no where under NZ Post?

 

 

Possibly , but they are separate companies anyway right 


2479 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 678


  Reply # 1526882 6-Apr-2016 12:19
Send private message

But Kiwibank exists (physically located) inside NZpost, so maybe this is just ensuring their premises doesnt get sold out under them?


1119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 388

Subscriber

  Reply # 1526884 6-Apr-2016 12:23
Send private message

I agree with the sale, get NZ post away from kiwi bank, this will give it a lot more room for movement in the years to come.





Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man


1728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 382

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1526918 6-Apr-2016 12:39
Send private message

Mspec:

 

I agree with the sale, get NZ post away from kiwi bank, this will give it a lot more room for movement in the years to come.

 

 

 

 

There's also the small issue of shareholder responsibility. Shareholders can be called to inject cash into a business if it is failing or is required to meet law. NZ Post continues to crash and would be in breach of it's responsibility to support kiwibank.

 

Doesn't matter if it's a merry go round and that 'the crown' ultimately owns it. Money and cash still have to come from somewhere, and now it's acc and the super fund, who will also benefit from dividend payments to prop their own organisations.

 

It's just sensible business.





________

 

Antonios K

 

 

 

Click to see full size


4963 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1319

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 1526919 6-Apr-2016 12:40
3 people support this post
Send private message

sell 100% of NZ Post and TVNZ as well before they're worth nothing like Solid Energy


gzt

10125 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1541


  Reply # 1526951 6-Apr-2016 13:08
Send private message

Solid Energy followed such a bizzare strategy led by its executives it is a very odd case. Not really comparable.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.