The thing about this story is that no-one did anything exceptional. I don't understand why an injunction was even asked for, let alone granted. It should not have been reported at all. But if a media organisation insists on doing that anyway, then at least be honest about it and report the whole story, including the names. As far as I can see, the names are the only reason media outside the injunction area, including those in this country, are being so coy about it. I don't think that is exercising freedom of the press; to my mind it is hypocritical. I don't want faceless media people I cannot hold to account deciding for themselves what I should be allowed to know.