Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
7529 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3949


  Reply # 1587446 7-Jul-2016 08:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

What we need are the Borg. They would soon sort this nonsense out.

 

 

 

 

The right-wing talk-back radio listening stuff-comment-posting vigilante-screeching hang/whip/send-'em-to-devil's-island mob are the Borg.

 

Fortunately their masters are better informed.


12007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1587708 7-Jul-2016 15:16
Send private message

Fred99:

 

Geektastic:

 

What we need are the Borg. They would soon sort this nonsense out.

 

 

 

 

The right-wing talk-back radio listening stuff-comment-posting vigilante-screeching hang/whip/send-'em-to-devil's-island mob are the Borg.

 

Fortunately their masters are better informed.

 

 

 

 

I think the Borg would be a tad more direct....






1362 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 348


  Reply # 1587928 8-Jul-2016 06:59
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

What we need are the Borg. They would soon sort this nonsense out.

 

 

 

 

I guess the real world equivalent of that would be a lobotomy ... nasty ....


7529 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3949


  Reply # 1587990 8-Jul-2016 10:00
One person supports this post
Send private message

Mark:

 

Geektastic:

 

What we need are the Borg. They would soon sort this nonsense out.

 

 

 

 

I guess the real world equivalent of that would be a lobotomy ... nasty ....

 

 

 

 

A modern equivalent may be to medicate them.

 

Certain ethical questions would arise, but it's not as if it's not done (without consent) anyway - when it's determined that it's suitable for the benefit of a (non-criminal) patient.


Glurp
8444 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3878

Subscriber

  Reply # 1588078 8-Jul-2016 11:46
Send private message

If the subject is deemed non compos mentis, it is considered ethical to provide treatment in the best interests of the subject even without informed consent, which cannot be given. This is equivalent to treating a young child.

 

If the subject is a violent or anti-social criminal who has been convicted of a sufficiently serious crime, a choice could be offered between accepting medication, whatever that might be, or spending a lifetime locked up in a small box. The decision would be up to the subject. The question remains what kind of medication would be sufficiently effective and reliable, never mind the problems of ensuring it remains correctly administered.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


gzt

10254 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576


  Reply # 1588082 8-Jul-2016 12:06
Send private message

.... we got all the way back to sci-fi again. That knowledge simply does not exist with any scientific certainty.

Several times in the past various.people and institutions were certain about it and the results were somewhat dystopian to say the least.

Don't go expecting any different the second time around.

12007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1588096 8-Jul-2016 12:15
Send private message

Don't they use chemical castration on rapists etc somewhere? Sure I read that.






2491 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1219

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1588123 8-Jul-2016 12:47
Send private message

They certainly used it on homosexuals... look up Alan Turing.

 

 


BTR

1484 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 443


  Reply # 1588194 8-Jul-2016 13:31
One person supports this post
Send private message

Should we take the GOT or Trump concept and build a wall, put the good people on one side and the bad people on the other and then get Gandolf to stand in the doorway shouting "thou shall not pass"......

 

IMO I would rather spent a few dollars on a bullet for this guy than paying to keep him in prison. 


7529 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3949


  Reply # 1588201 8-Jul-2016 13:42
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

If the subject is deemed non compos mentis, it is considered ethical to provide treatment in the best interests of the subject even without informed consent, which cannot be given. This is equivalent to treating a young child.

 

If the subject is a violent or anti-social criminal who has been convicted of a sufficiently serious crime, a choice could be offered between accepting medication, whatever that might be, or spending a lifetime locked up in a small box. The decision would be up to the subject. The question remains what kind of medication would be sufficiently effective and reliable, never mind the problems of ensuring it remains correctly administered.

 

 

 

 

 

 

They have to be more than simply non compos mentis - it has to be determined that the person may be of serious danger to their own, or others’ health and safety.  Proving that (when they've not done anything except behave in a very strange manner etc) is fraught with difficulty.

 

 

 

There would be all kinds of ethical issues in testing a treatment for "anti-violence" if one was proposed.  "Chemical castration" has been used in NZ for sex offenders - it doesn't always work:


Glurp
8444 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3878

Subscriber

  Reply # 1588233 8-Jul-2016 13:49
Send private message

BTR:

 

Should we take the GOT or Trump concept and build a wall, put the good people on one side and the bad people on the other and then get Gandolf to stand in the doorway shouting "thou shall not pass"......

 

IMO I would rather spent a few dollars on a bullet for this guy than paying to keep him in prison. 

 

 

And how much are you willing to spend to compensate the families of those murdered by the State who later turn out to be innocent?

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


Glurp
8444 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3878

Subscriber

  Reply # 1588237 8-Jul-2016 13:59
Send private message

Fred99:

 

 

 

They have to be more than simply non compos mentis - it has to be determined that the person may be of serious danger to their own, or others’ health and safety.  Proving that (when they've not done anything except behave in a very strange manner etc) is fraught with difficulty.

 

There would be all kinds of ethical issues in testing a treatment for "anti-violence" if one was proposed.  "Chemical castration" has been used in NZ for sex offenders - it doesn't always work:

 

 

I did say 'in the best interests of'. And not only does chemical castration not always work, it is largely based on a myth. Mainly, it just makes men impotent. It doesn't make them want to stop hurting people. It doesn't even make them want to stop raping. What it does do is give those men who are already motivated to change their behaviour more control over their sexual impulses. The myth is just something made up by the simple-minded who keep hoping for quick fixes to complex issues.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


306 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 1589382 11-Jul-2016 07:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

BTR:

 

Should we take the GOT or Trump concept and build a wall, put the good people on one side and the bad people on the other and then get Gandolf to stand in the doorway shouting "thou shall not pass"......

 

IMO I would rather spent a few dollars on a bullet for this guy than paying to keep him in prison. 

 

 

And how much are you willing to spend to compensate the families of those murdered by the State who later turn out to be innocent?

 

 

 

 

If you read his comment you'll see he is talking about THIS guy

 

How do you propose compensating this guys future victims if he re-offends?


12007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1589418 11-Jul-2016 09:51
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

BTR:

 

Should we take the GOT or Trump concept and build a wall, put the good people on one side and the bad people on the other and then get Gandolf to stand in the doorway shouting "thou shall not pass"......

 

IMO I would rather spent a few dollars on a bullet for this guy than paying to keep him in prison. 

 

 

And how much are you willing to spend to compensate the families of those murdered by the State who later turn out to be innocent?

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Blain, David for example?






306 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 1589445 11-Jul-2016 10:09
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Rikkitic:

 

BTR:

 

Should we take the GOT or Trump concept and build a wall, put the good people on one side and the bad people on the other and then get Gandolf to stand in the doorway shouting "thou shall not pass"......

 

IMO I would rather spent a few dollars on a bullet for this guy than paying to keep him in prison. 

 

 

And how much are you willing to spend to compensate the families of those murdered by the State who later turn out to be innocent?

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Blain, David for example?

 

 

Please explain how this guy is like David Blain?


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.