Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




79 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


Topic # 204866 20-Oct-2016 17:50
Send private message

Does anyone know the research that led Newshub, on TV3, to feature backgrounds that move or are animated, in some way? They are generally fixed images that slowly change position behind the presenter (e.g. the weather maps, but also on most backgrounds) though the sports section features a bit more with constantly changing bits of images, not necessarily even relevant to what is being presented.


I suppose it's trivial but it can be distracting and I can't think of a single possible reason why the producers thought it was a good idea.


Oddly, on one programme (I think it was The Nation) only one camera featured the movement, another camera position showed no movement with the same background. It's bizarre.


Thoughts?


Create new topic
2772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 555


  Reply # 1655310 20-Oct-2016 19:28
Send private message

I have often wondered how much work they have to do with those sort of images.
The media like to get old historical photos and float the background behind people or objects in the front. I guess they cut one layer out of the photo and have to photoshop bits of the background that weren't in the photos.

They do add a little interest to the images.




Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler

gzt

10310 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1582


  Reply # 1655415 20-Oct-2016 22:25
Send private message

It is something to hold attention. That is all. It annoys me but I'm not the target market for that.

 
 
 
 




79 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1655423 20-Oct-2016 22:48
Send private message

gzt: It is something to hold attention. That is all. It annoys me but I'm not the target market for that.

 

But it holds attention to the background image, which distracts from what is actually being said. For the weather, that's less of an issue but I find myself tracking the picture, because I'm subconsciously trying to fix on some part of the map.

 

I just don't get it. I tried some feedback on their site but didn't get a response.

 

[Thanks to the person who corrected my spelling mistake in the topic title]


21613 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4430

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1655708 21-Oct-2016 13:41
One person supports this post
Send private message

Stop watching it then? I can't see any compelling reason to watch TV news at all.





Richard rich.ms



79 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1655854 21-Oct-2016 16:21
Send private message

richms:

 

Stop watching it then? I can't see any compelling reason to watch TV news at all.

 

 

Fair point, apart from Al Jazeera, perhaps!


4160 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 760

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1655964 21-Oct-2016 20:16
Send private message

The Newshub bulletins are a bit of a waste of time if you're getting your news throughout the day, but The Nation is actually very good.


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.