Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
19060 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5536

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674565 20-Nov-2016 16:33
3 people support this post
Send private message

It's amazing to me that people blame Religion for crazy acts of terror and violence. If it wasn't for Religion do you think these things would not occur at all? Evil people will behave badly regardless, Religion is just one such thing to lean on as an excuse. 

 

I myself whilst raised in religion am no longer religious as such, but the base of what I learned have put me in good stead for the way I live my life. I do accept some people do live equal lives without that basis.


Mad Scientist
19619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2602

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674624 20-Nov-2016 19:19
3 people support this post
Send private message

frankv:

 

deadlyllama:

 

My old church in Wellington sent money overseas, to support missionaries who were originally members of that church.

 

 

Not a great example in the current context... sending money overseas to further the aims of the Church (i.e. convince more people to join) is hardly a charitable act.

 

 

 

 

You don't know. All of the ones I know of are overseas to cater for the needs of the poor, the invisible, the untoucables.

 

Eg - slums in India, refuge houses in Cambodia/Myanmar/Thailand for boys and girls who have been sold as labour slaves and sex slaves - these guys buy them and house them, or just house those who managed to escape, give them an education and a future, makes me sick and sad. THere are also those who work in orphanages where drunk and stoned parents just leave their infants because they were not wanted, or they were too poor to care for them. Oh how I wish I could go and rescue every one of those. Also makes me even more sick because I also have kids.

 

I hear a lot of counter arguments about oh how we also have the needy in the local areas. Nothing compared to these, not even close. But yes I agree there are the needy everywhere. Inc Trump land. And God's own.





Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


 
 
 
 


sxz

654 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 149


  Reply # 1674640 20-Nov-2016 19:48
Send private message

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.


Mad Scientist
19619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2602

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674647 20-Nov-2016 20:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

sxz:

 

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.

 

 

Yeah so we can have a second flag referendum and build another Team NZ boat for when it snaps.





Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


13720 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6445

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1674648 20-Nov-2016 20:06
3 people support this post
Send private message

sxz:

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.



How would Salvation Army do good if a chunk of the donations they receive goes to taxes?




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

A Tiger in Africa, probably escaped from the Zoo.

 

 


3210 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1008

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674689 20-Nov-2016 21:17
Send private message

MikeB4:
sxz:

 

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax. 



How would Salvation Army do good if a chunk of the donations they receive goes to taxes?

 

A question which encompasses so much.

 

At the end of the day you can't selectively strip one religious organisation of it's tax exemption and leave the others. It's an all or nothing situation. The only alternative would be to have Destiny stripped of it's religious organisation status - attempting that would tie the Government up for years in the Courts so it ain't gonna happen. Same with stripping all religious organisations of tax free status - years of litigation along with an iron clad guarantee for whomever is in power that they'll lose the next election.

 

Disclaimer: I haven't bothered reading through this thread so apologies if I'm parroting what other people have already said.


12394 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4090

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674691 20-Nov-2016 21:18
One person supports this post
Send private message

sxz:

 

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.

 

 

 

 

I'm not sure the government is always the most effective spender of other people's earnings to be honest.






13720 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6445

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1674693 20-Nov-2016 21:25
Send private message

Dratsab:

MikeB4:
sxz:


If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax. 



How would Salvation Army do good if a chunk of the donations they receive goes to taxes?


A question which encompasses so much.


At the end of the day you can't selectively strip one religious organisation of it's tax exemption and leave the others. It's an all or nothing situation. The only alternative would be to have Destiny stripped of it's religious organisation status - attempting that would tie the Government up for years in the Courts so it ain't gonna happen. Same with stripping all religious organisations of tax free status - years of litigation along with an iron clad guarantee for whomever is in power that they'll lose the next election.


Disclaimer: I haven't bothered reading through this thread so apologies if I'm parroting what other people have already said.



While I believe that Bishop Tamaki is an abomination there are few things to consider.

1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of religion

Why put the good works done by a lot of church groups at risk because of the stupidity of one person. Why put at risk freedom of speech and freedom of religion because of the stupidity of one person. There may well be laws he has broken such as hate speech or exciting discrimination. In the end he has done more damage to his organisation than any punitive action could do..




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

A Tiger in Africa, probably escaped from the Zoo.

 

 


19060 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5536

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1674696 20-Nov-2016 21:39
Send private message



While I believe that Bishop Tamaki is an abomination there are few things to consider.

1. Freedom of speech
2. Freedom of religion

Why put the good works done by a lot of church groups at risk because of the stupidity of one person. Why put at risk freedom of speech and freedom of religion because of the stupidity of one person. There may well be laws he has broken such as hate speech or exciting discrimination. In the end he has done more damage to his organisation than any punitive action could do..

 

 

 

Sadly whilst it SHOULD be true he has done untold damage, like Trump his followers are unlikely to find this puts them off. He has been saying dumb things for years, and behaving in ways it's hard to believe God would find acceptable, people keep throwing their money at him and would probably follow him to the end of the earth (or at least to a complex in South Auckland for a mass suicide). 

 

 


sxz

654 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 149


  Reply # 1674701 20-Nov-2016 22:14
Send private message

Geektastic:

sxz:


If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.



 


I'm not sure the government is always the most effective spender of other people's earnings to be honest.



A country can't run without income. I pay my tax, I'm sure you do too. So do businesses. Why shouldn't a church? I'd love to be able to choose where and how my tax money is spent, but I can't. What makes a church so special?

Anyway, they would only be paying a portion of their income on tax, they would still get to send the best majority wherever they want.

It's an outdated law for outdated ideals

13720 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6445

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1674702 20-Nov-2016 22:17
Send private message

sxz:
Geektastic:

sxz:


If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.



 


I'm not sure the government is always the most effective spender of other people's earnings to be honest.



A country can't run without income. I pay my tax, I'm sure you do too. So do businesses. Why shouldn't a church? I'd love to be able to choose where and how my tax money is spent, but I can't. What makes a church so special?

Anyway, they would only be paying a portion of their income on tax, they would still get to send the best majority wherever they want.

It's an outdated law for outdated ideals


You response does not address the extensive charity work they do.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

A Tiger in Africa, probably escaped from the Zoo.

 

 


sxz

654 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 149


  Reply # 1674703 20-Nov-2016 22:17
Send private message

MikeB4:
sxz:

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.



How would Salvation Army do good if a chunk of the donations they receive goes to taxes?


Those taxes would mean everyone has more money to support sick people, single parents, education, etc. what do you think taxes are for?

They would still have a majority of their money left over for their own purposes

sxz

654 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 149


  Reply # 1674704 20-Nov-2016 22:19
Send private message

MikeB4:
sxz:
Geektastic:

sxz:


If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.



 


I'm not sure the government is always the most effective spender of other people's earnings to be honest.



A country can't run without income. I pay my tax, I'm sure you do too. So do businesses. Why shouldn't a church? I'd love to be able to choose where and how my tax money is spent, but I can't. What makes a church so special?

Anyway, they would only be paying a portion of their income on tax, they would still get to send the best majority wherever they want.

It's an outdated law for outdated ideals


You response does not address the extensive charity work they do.


Your response assumes church profits are always spent on charity.

Look at my first comment. Taxes are good. They make country's work. They help sick people. They help people who need help. If churches wanted to help they would pay taxes. Period.

2914 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 541


  Reply # 1674707 20-Nov-2016 22:27
Send private message

sxz: Your response assumes church profits are always spent on charity.


Your response assumes churches make a profit.

Remember taxes are paid on profits not income.




Sony Xperia X running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


14706 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2746

Trusted

  Reply # 1674710 20-Nov-2016 22:34
Send private message

sxz:
MikeB4:
sxz:
Geektastic:

 

sxz:

 

 

 

If churches wanted to do good they would pay tax.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not sure the government is always the most effective spender of other people's earnings to be honest.

 



A country can't run without income. I pay my tax, I'm sure you do too. So do businesses. Why shouldn't a church? I'd love to be able to choose where and how my tax money is spent, but I can't. What makes a church so special?

Anyway, they would only be paying a portion of their income on tax, they would still get to send the best majority wherever they want.

It's an outdated law for outdated ideals


You response does not address the extensive charity work they do.


Your response assumes church profits are always spent on charity.

Look at my first comment. Taxes are good. They make country's work. They help sick people. They help people who need help. If churches wanted to help they would pay taxes. Period.

 

That argument is flawed. You pay taxes on your income. If you donate to charity, that portion of income is tax free, as its a deductible. 

 

Therefore, any operation that runs not for profit, and ploughs back its earnings to charity should also be tax free.

 

However, when a not for profit operation allows its leader to take a $60,000 holiday on its followers, as he needs a rest, and he swans around in a new up market big car, that is not a not for profit organisation.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.